Thursday, April 09

Geek

Daily News Stuff 9 April 2026

Leapn't Year Edition

Top Story

  • Apple MacBooks slow down after 49 days due to a MacOS time bomb.  (Notebook Check)

    Not just MacBooks.  Anything running MacOS:
    This bug means that after exactly 49 days, 17 hours, 2 minutes and 47.296 seconds from the moment a Mac is switched on, network connections are no longer terminated correctly.  This initially leads to an increase in CPU utilization, because after some time hundreds or even thousands of connections are managed that should actually have been terminated.  As soon as the available ports, usually 16,384 in number, are used up, no more new connections can be established.
    49 days, 17 hours, 2 minutes, and 47.296 seconds?

    That number might ring a bell for the 29 year olds in the audience, because the same bug caused Windows 95 and 98 to crash outright when they were running for just shy of 50 days: It's a 32-bit unsigned integer counting milliseconds.

    Of course Windows 95 and 98 had the saving grace that they would usually crash for some other reason well before that time ran out.


Tech News


Musical Interlude





Disclaimer: Found it!

Posted by: Pixy Misa at 06:24 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 479 words, total size 5 kb.

1 "The solution in these cases is to use working chips"

So then the obvious question is, will that potential second wave of Neos use all 6 GPU cores, or will Apple gimp them...and if so, will anyone figure out how to re-enable them, as happened with (for example) the triple-core Athlons back in the day.

Posted by: Rick C at Thursday, April 09 2026 10:54 PM (Ul4rC)

2 I had a longer comment about that Verge article but the spam filter ate it because of the Verge's stupid "smart" quotes.  Apparently, this bimbo hates people who use it to "optimize their health".

As a type 2 diabetic whose been using them for a year, I love CGMs.

Posted by: Rick C at Thursday, April 09 2026 11:10 PM (Ul4rC)

3 A couple more thoughts about the Verge article: if she's ripping sensors off from taking off shirts and bumping into doors she probably should see a doctor for her balance issues. I get where she's coming from on the shirts--every time I take a shirt off I feel it hitting my cgm, but I learned after the first time how to change the way I doff it so as not to do that. (I assume she means she rips the sensor wire out of her skin, and not actually tears the whole cgm off her arm, because the amount of adhesive on those means she'd probably tear her skin.) Finally, the fact that she hasn't done enough (read: minimal) research to discover adhesive removers is a little concerning. She's right about the adhesive residue, but you can buy wipes like alcohol prep pads but with stuff actually designed to remove the goo (alcohol isn't actually very good at it) and they're not expensive. I learned about it within watching like 5 videos about CGM insertion and removal, where some guy showed how to remove the sensor with the help of the wipe...which also goes a long way to avoid a rash.

Posted by: Rick C at Friday, April 10 2026 02:34 AM (HTbvf)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




Apple pies are delicious. But never mind apple pies. What colour is a green orange?




55kb generated in CPU 0.0604, elapsed 0.1641 seconds.
58 queries taking 0.1526 seconds, 366 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.