No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow.
Friday, April 30
Abuse & Misuse
The National Coalition for the Abuse and Misuse of Statistics* have been running ads on Streetvision** lately, proclaiming that:
Handguns kill over 400,000 people each year. 80% of them are women and children.***
Yeah, I'd noticed that we've been hip-deep in dead bodies lately, down here in Oz. 400,000 every year, just from handguns...
Oh, that's not an Australian statistic, you say?
Funny, that.
So how many people are killed by handguns**** in Australia each year? This handy article in The Age, found in about 10 seconds of Googling, tells us that the number in 2001 was 49.
This represents a drop since tough new restrictions were put in place in 1996, from a 1991 figure of 29.
No, hang on - isn't 49 more than 29? I could've sworn...
And those numbers include accidents and suicides. Suicide is the single largest cause of death involving firearms, and accounted for 80% of such deaths over a ten-year period from 1991 to 2001.
And 90% of the victims in that ten-year period were men.
But far be it from me to accuse the National Coalition for Gun Control of being somewhat careless with the truth.
* Well, they call themselves the National Coalition for Gun Control, but...
** Television - 90% ads - projected at captive audiences in the underground stations in Sydney.
*** That may not be exact, but it's pretty close.
**** Yeah, I know. Guns don't kill people - I do.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
06:45 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 247 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Thanks. My ENGL class is currently talking about the misuse of statistics...this is a perfect example to point out to them!
Posted by: Sarah at Friday, April 30 2004 08:13 AM (mU8BX)
2
And while I don't have a detailed breakdown of handgun deaths by cause, overall it works out to around 80% suicide, 10% accident, and 10% homicide. So the average number of people killed by handguns each year - deliberately, by other people, in Australia - is about 4.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, April 30 2004 08:23 AM (+S1Ft)
3
Pixy,
Welcome to my world. lol Ol' Sam Clemens (that Twain fellow) often quoted Benjamin Disraeli on this subject. To loosely paraphrase there are 3 kinds of mistruths in the world; lies, damn lies & statistics.
In the U.S. the gun control debate has been raging a bit longer & hotter & the junk science used to back up the prohibitionists arguments are sometimes laughable. Perhaps the funniest of late wasn't about stats per se, but CNN did a story on "assault weapons". They showed a pre-ban & a post ban model being fired. The pre-ban assault weapon easily penetrated some cinderblocks while the post ban didn't seem to phase them. Turns out CNN got busted cause the post ban rifle wasn't being fired at the cinderblocks at all while they were filming. But why let truth get in the way of filming an ideological piece, right?
The Smallest Minority is a good source for busting badly used stats - one of my favorites is where he pointed out that the "children" a U.S. gun prohibition group was lamenting included 24 year olds.
Anyway, for this & a number of other reasons I generally try to direct any arguments away from stats & steer them towards logic &/or principles. It's easy as hell to find stats to support almost any position you'd want to support, & almost as easy to find stats to refute said position. It eventually comes down to a person believing one stat over the other for any number of reasons - so I avoid the stats thing when I can & try to make them actually think.
Posted by: Publicola at Friday, April 30 2004 04:06 PM (Aao25)
4
Excellent piece! Linked!
Oh, and Publicola, I use the stats to
help them think. Especially when they're twisted as blatantly as they are here.
People don't like being lied to.
Posted by: Kevin Baker at Tuesday, May 04 2004 11:18 AM (gQkQa)
5
Nice try. The restrictions did not affect handguns at all. And you somehow forget to mention that gun deaths have halved. And Kevin fell for it.
Posted by: Tim Lambert at Tuesday, May 04 2004 02:21 PM (myTQZ)
6
Yes, Tim, gun deaths have been reduced.
But the add was specifically addressing handguns, using completely bogus statistics. And there
have been new restrictions on handguns in the past ten years. And deaths from handguns have
increased.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, May 04 2004 04:41 PM (+S1Ft)
7
Yeah, right. What restrictions were introduced on handguns in 1996? I haven't seen the ad. Maybe it did use bogus statistics, but that is no excuse for you to use bogus statistics.
Posted by: Tim Lambert at Tuesday, May 04 2004 09:45 PM (myTQZ)
8
Kevin,
Now ya see why I prefer to avoid stats altogether? People like Mr. Lambert will generally be able to produce stats which seem on the surface to contradict any stats you throw out. Not that the counter stats are the correct ones, but unless you have some schooling in statistical analysis then most people odds are you'll believe the stats you hear most often (43 times mor elikely, etc...).
But where people such as Mr. Lambert can be shown the error of their ways (well, as much as possible) is through non-stat arguments. At least more spectators will be able to follow the discussion accurately & draw their own conclusions.
Not that arguing stats is not worthwhile or that it should be universally shunned (after all you do a good job of dissecting bogus stats), but for me I find it's often best to concentrate on other areas.
Besides, when it gets down to an "is not- is too" thing over which stats are accurate, then the debate has shifted from a Rights argument to a Policy argument. I'd much rather keep it as a Rights argument than delve into the policy thing. But that's just me & my absolutist self. :)
& I must speak the heresy that some would burn me at the stake for: stats are not the most important thing in many cases. Nor are they even conclusive of one point or another in some cases. Stats are just stats. Nothing more than a set of numbers. Useful things can be learned from them but they are not the last word on the wisdom or folly of most decisions.
Mr. Lambert,
I think you're confusing the issue. Pixy was talking about handgun deaths, whereas you brought up firearms deaths. See the difference? handguns are firearms but not all firearms are handguns.
Or were you berating Pixy that he didn't mention that all firearms deaths were reduced by half (if your claim is accurate) even though he was discussing a subset of firearms deaths specifically?
But the bigger question lies not in whose stats were correct or which stats should have been used, but how can you use a set of numbers with questionable origin & interpretation to justify denying me (or anyone else) a basic, Natural Right?
Pixy,
Doesn't all this make you want to be a gun blogger full time? lol
Posted by: Publicola at Wednesday, May 05 2004 12:28 AM (Aao25)
9
Tim, I think further handgun restrictions were brought in during 2001.
Now, I
didn't use bogus statistics, but I also failed to bring up some relevant information. You're right to mention that.
While I'm pro gun-ownership, I'm rather more strongly anti statistics-abuse. That was my point here.
If the ad had said "Up to 49 people die in Australia every year in incidents involving handguns", I would have had no complaints. I might have disagreed with the opinion expressed
- therefor handguns should be banned but that is
opinion and there's room for disagreement and compromise.
But the ad, as it is presented, provides an impression which is out of line with reality by
5 orders of magnitude, which is really a bit much. How would you feel about an ad that said:2 million people are killed by malaria each year. Half of those are children.If that ad was run by the Australian Council for the Legalisation and Promotion of DDT - calling for widespread spraying of our waterways? Would you point out that Australia has typically less than 10 deaths from malaria each year?
We don't have a major problem with malaria in Australia, and never have, and we don't need to spray DDT all over the place. The situation in other countries may be different.
Exactly the same applies with handguns and the ad in question.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, May 05 2004 01:17 AM (kOqZ6)
10
Dear Mr Publicola,
Apparently you are unaware of the nature of the "tough new restrictions" that were brought into place in 1996. Pixy implies that these were restrictions on handguns. They weren't. He tries to paint the 1996 laws as a failure because deaths from handguns went up, but the 1996 laws did not affect handguns. They did affect long guns, and those deaths have halved.
He then compounds things with his statement that there have been new restrictions on handguns in the last ten years. Indeed there have. What Pixy somehow neglected to mention was that those restrictions were introduced after 2001. But Pixy tries to make it look like they were to blame for an increase in handgun deaths between 1991 and 2001.
Nice going. American pro-gunners just lap this stuff up. Pixy's bogus stats will probably now get repeated a bajillion times like that stupid email claiming that gun murders had increased by 300% after the 1996 laws.
And by the way, I've already stated that
I do not think that the 1996 laws were a good idea.
Posted by: Tim Lambert at Wednesday, May 05 2004 03:50 AM (tgbdA)
11
Dear Tim,
You're nuts.
Regards,
Pixy
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, May 05 2004 04:58 AM (+S1Ft)
12
Tim's not nuts, just so focused on his particular specialty he can't see the forest for the trees.
He's "differently abled."
Posted by: Kevin Baker at Wednesday, May 05 2004 09:22 PM (X3MkM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thursday, April 29
Eaten By Mice
Hi all.
I've been eaten by mice (again) so blogging will be very light to non-existent for a week or two.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
05:56 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Dang, I hate it when that happens.
Posted by: Jim at Thursday, April 29 2004 09:33 AM (IOwam)
2
Still trying to figure out how to package a kitten so it will make it safely to upside-down land...note to self: need more bubblewrap....
Posted by: Susie at Thursday, April 29 2004 01:44 PM (mWp92)
3
I am not taking the blame for this, and please, are there not enough kittens and cats already?
Posted by: Mr Mouse at Thursday, April 29 2004 07:50 PM (JCxVY)
4
Hmm, the cheese faction is noticably quiet ...
Posted by: Debbye at Friday, April 30 2004 01:17 PM (iMG32)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wednesday, April 28
Tuesday, April 27
Quicksilver
One has to be in a certain mood to enjoy a book like this - or at least,
I have to be - not unlike the mood where I'm prepared to enjoy Cervantes or Sir Walter Scott. But since I am in such a mood right now, I am enjoying it very much.
It's certainly a rambling tale, but it rambles it's way past and through many points of interest, so I have few complaints. I was under the impression that the Old London Bridge had been destroyed by the time the novel is set (the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries), but it turns out that this is not the case - although the bridge was burned down in 1014, destroyed by a storm in 1091, burned down again in 1136, and the site of catastrophic fires in 1212 and 1633. It was replaced in 1831 by a less combustible stone structure, which was widened in 1904 whereupon it sank into the swamp. Well, it sank slowly, but still...
That sort of history boggles me just a little, as Sydney's famous Harbour Bridge is only seventy years old and has so far not been destroyed even once. To paraphrase someone: In England, a hundred miles is a long distance; in Australia, a hundred years is a long time.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:03 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 221 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That one burned down, fell over and then sank into the swamp ... but the next one stayed UP!
And that's what you're going to get lad, the strongest bridge in London Town.
Pity it's a bit dull though.
Posted by: Rob at Tuesday, April 27 2004 11:10 AM (kXZI6)
2
LOL! Rob stole my comment!!! So I guess that I'll have to say that the time/distance thing is true of the U.S. too--Chicago's only 200 miles away, we can be there by lunch!
Posted by: Susie at Tuesday, April 27 2004 12:53 PM (5H/6B)
3
Yay pre-emptive comment theft ... It had to be done though.
Here in Jersey we suffer from an inversion of the time distance thing. Going 2 miles to the next parish seems like a long way.
Ah well, I guess that's what you get for living on an island that's only 9 miles x 6
Posted by: Rob at Wednesday, April 28 2004 05:12 AM (kXZI6)
4
great minds...
Rob, we'll be sure to send Stitch your way.
Pixy, your comments don't remember me.
Posted by: Ted at Wednesday, April 28 2004 09:43 AM (blNMI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Monday, April 26
ANZAC Day

They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old;
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We will remember them.
This is ANZAC Day.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:02 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My deepest respects on this day for the incredible bravery and dogged determination of those who fought at Gallipoli and the members of your military who continue to emulate and honour their example.
I wish I could express just how much we value the friendship and partnership with Australia.
Our media be damned - they were fussing over France while we were grinning like idiots because our troops were to be partnered with the world's finest soldiers.
God bless all those who guard and protect us.
Posted by: Debbye at Monday, April 26 2004 08:57 AM (wSXdB)
2
I'll second what Debbye said. I'd rather have one Aussie at my back than one thousand French.
Posted by: Kathy K at Monday, April 26 2004 12:16 PM (Cy5b3)
3
Personally, as an Aussie, I'd rather have one Kiwi or one Yank than any number of surrender monkeys :-) Better still would be more Aussies :-)
Posted by: Ozguru at Monday, April 26 2004 08:03 PM (B/SLC)
4
Debbye said it better than I ever could. Thanks for true friends in the world.
Posted by: Ted at Tuesday, April 27 2004 08:26 AM (blNMI)
5
See, now here I was thinking it was all about
this (and a hardcopy of the link is http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,9379234%255E661,00.html)
Posted by: xade at Tuesday, April 27 2004 09:40 PM (9Nu+w)
6
Maybe from this day forward, I shall think of the day before my birthday as a much more important date to remember.
Posted by: Tiger at Thursday, April 29 2004 07:55 PM (JCxVY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
OurSQL
Upgraded the MuNu MT database to MySQL today, something I should have done long ago. If you're going to run Movable Type, it's
definitely worth your time to use MySQL or PostgreSQL (or I think SQLite is also supported). For a brand new blog there isn't much difference, but on a very large installation like MuNu, a SQL* database can be as much as 10 times faster.
With this on top of the Minxification of Ambient Irony, I now have some of the fastest MT comments around. Leave me a comment, and marvel in the fastness of it! It's almost... adequate!
* I say "a SQL database" rather than "an SQL database" because in my head I pronounce SQL as "skwuhl".
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
07:56 AM
| Comments (21)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 123 words, total size 1 kb.
1
See! Fast!
Pity it keeps forgetting who I am...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, April 26 2004 07:57 AM (+S1Ft)
Posted by: Simon at Monday, April 26 2004 08:48 AM (+OTDr)
3
4 seconds. That's fast.
Posted by: Simon at Monday, April 26 2004 08:49 AM (+OTDr)
4
I expect it's even faster if you're on the same side of the planet as the server :)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, April 26 2004 08:51 AM (+S1Ft)
5
(The actual processing seems to take less than 2 seconds.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, April 26 2004 08:52 AM (+S1Ft)
6
Speed is cool. I like speed.
Posted by: Jim at Monday, April 26 2004 09:00 AM (saeHM)
Posted by: Susie at Monday, April 26 2004 12:10 PM (5H/6B)
8
Your comment system has one important flaw. All comments are downloaded with the main page whether the comments are desired or not. This isn't a big deal when there are few comments, but have a bunch of posts with large amounts of comments and the numbers start to add up.
Posted by: Rossz at Monday, April 26 2004 06:14 PM (n5Jbg)
9
Pixy has done it again.
Ai was fiddling around in my templates this morning and rebuilding the index was so fast I did it twice because I didn't believe it the first time.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at Monday, April 26 2004 08:23 PM (4819r)
10
Ross - This is true. But. Um...
You've got broadband anyway, so you won't even notice! Nyaa! (Basically it's a latency vs. bandwidth thing. Takes longer to load the main page, which can be fixed with more bandwidth - but - much less latency for reading comments, and it's a lot harder to reduce latency than to add bandwidth.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, April 27 2004 01:52 AM (+S1Ft)
11
MYSQL has been a dream for me. easy to backup, easy to use. my comments are still slow mt comments, though. even slower with mt-blacklist. i need to look into Minxification.
Umm, does that come in a bottle?
Posted by: rammer at Tuesday, April 27 2004 04:11 AM (VSkqV)
12
I always pronounce it "SQueaL", which has the added advantaget that SQL*Plus can be pronounced as "squeal splat plus"...
Posted by: Dominic at Tuesday, April 27 2004 07:42 AM (0h0BM)
13
Minxification? Does it have anything to do with
cheese?
Posted by: Mr Mouse at Tuesday, April 27 2004 10:26 PM (yNckt)
14
True, the broadband does make it inconsequential. I suppose the dialup people might notice, but screw them - they don't count.
BTW, did I mention how much I'm paying for my 5Meg/500k DSL connection?
Posted by: Rossz at Tuesday, April 27 2004 11:27 PM (n5Jbg)
15
GADZOOKS, man! Everything is running MUCH MUCH faster over at Miss Apropos' tuffet.
You. Are. A GOD!
Thankyouthankyouthankyou!
Posted by: Emma at Wednesday, April 28 2004 05:43 PM (kpNlZ)
Posted by: spacemonkey at Thursday, April 29 2004 01:08 AM (qSKHX)
17
Amazingly fast. What were we running before? I'm almost enticed to play with MySQL.
hln
Posted by: hln at Thursday, April 29 2004 06:56 PM (yJyUC)
18
Actually, it's still kind of slow. But it's a
lot better than it was.
We were running Berkeley DB before. There's nothing wrong with Berkeley DB - I've used it for far larger databases and it's fast and robust. It's just that MT doesn't use it properly. It works much better with SQL databases (MySQL, PostgreSQL and SQLite are supported, I think).
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, April 30 2004 07:00 AM (+S1Ft)
19
Sound like a worthwhile upgrade... I'm currently using the BerkeleyDB method, how much of a pain in the arse is it to change over to MySQL?
Maybe I'll attempt that this weekend, along with installing PHP on my server so I can add more fun MT goodies...
-=kt=-
Posted by: ktpupp at Friday, April 30 2004 08:29 AM (LJejX)
20
My SQL instructor said it was usually pronounced as "Sequel". But he thought it might have been an east coast thing 'cause most pros around here (Fabulous Las Vegas) pronounce the letters "Ess Que Ell". I always pronounce it "Squirrel".
Posted by: Enas Yorl at Sunday, May 02 2004 06:45 PM (pGeyo)
21
"Sequel" is certainly standard in the UK, above a certain level of familiarity at least. "Squirrel" I had never heard! I still like "squeal" best, though...
Posted by: Dominic at Monday, May 03 2004 06:29 AM (evDgD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Saturday, April 24
Emergency! Emergency!
An otherwise uninspiring day at work was brightened by the approach of three shiny red fire engines, sirens blaring.
Where are they heading?
Looks like they're stopping.
Which building?
Um... Ours.
But... If there's a fire in our building, shouldn't there be -
BEEEP! BEEEEP! BEEEEEEP! BEEEEEEEEP!!
- an alarm?
Uh-oh. I grabbed my apple turnover and last night's backup tape, and headed downstairs. Where we milled about for ten minutes before the firepersons came back out and let us go back to work.
So the building completely failed to burn down, but the fire engines were particularly shiny.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:46 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 103 words, total size 1 kb.
1
There is something to be said for the same old boring routine after all...
Posted by: Susie at Saturday, April 24 2004 12:22 PM (mI3rz)
2
We used to get the ambulance at our building like clockwork after every three-day weekend. We had a binge-drinking alcoholic with hepatitis who'd manage to make it to work before going into seizures. Every. Damn. Time. He finally died, poor soul.
Posted by: Ted at Saturday, April 24 2004 03:38 PM (ZjSa7)
3
Were all of the company mice safely evacuated? You know how easily they get crushed in the mad rush to the exits?
Posted by: Mr Mouse at Saturday, April 24 2004 07:21 PM (JCxVY)
4
I grabbed my apple turnover Gotta Remember the important stuff in an emergancy. =)
Posted by: Mookie at Saturday, April 24 2004 07:37 PM (ZjSa7)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, April 26 2004 07:47 AM (+S1Ft)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, April 26 2004 07:48 AM (+S1Ft)
7
Where are the pictures? That should slow it down a bit :-)
Posted by: Ozguru at Tuesday, April 27 2004 11:13 PM (/acvO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Friday, April 23
Fried Brains
It's what's for dinner.
No, wait! Pie! I have pie!
Mmm, pie...
[Well, that's next week's Bonfire entry sorted out. — Ed.]
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:30 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
1
If you get a chance, can you create a cPanel account for me to use for USURP. It seems my troll is cruising it now and I want to ban her URL: 64.6.xxx.xxx
Posted by: Tiger at Friday, April 23 2004 08:30 PM (G5PGV)
2
Actually, I suppose that would technically be an IP address.
Posted by: Tiger at Friday, April 23 2004 08:31 PM (G5PGV)
Posted by: Alan E Brain at Tuesday, April 27 2004 08:46 AM (p1Zeb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wednesday, April 21
And Now...
I just need something that folds and irons and puts away...
There are automatic ironing machines, but last I read they were not exactly practical. Until the day they reach the mass market, I will remain hopeful and slightly crumpled.
Oh, and the PostgreSQL load died with an error too boring to relate here. So it's MySQL for munu.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:13 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.
Tuesday, April 20
Who Let The Brap Out?
I can't for the life of me work out why the mt-db2sql.cgi program is so slow. I put both the Berkeley DB (the old database) and the MySQL DB (the new database) in a ram disk, and it behaved
exactly the same. Moofleglerp.
I'm familiar with Berkeley DB, and I've never seen it behave like that. I'm less familiar with MySQL, but I've never seen MySQL behave like that either. Right now I'm trying it with PostgreSQL, and any moment now... Crunch! As soon as it finishes with the comments and starts transferring the entries, performance drops to zero. It's not CPU bound, it doesn't seem to be I/O bound, it just sucks.
Well, I'll let it finish anyway, and then I'll have more numbers for comparison.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
06:06 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 137 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Perhaps there is a voodoo curse upon them? Did you remember to clear your throat three times before sacrificing the iguana?
Posted by: Susie at Wednesday, April 21 2004 10:52 AM (mPuO+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Monday, April 19
Wash And Wear
I doubt it will surprise many of my readers that I went for the fancy whiz-bang (no, not
that whiz-bang) condensing washer/dryer over its cheaper, less whiz-bang competition.
It washes! It dries! It washes and dries! And it doesn't steam up the laundry!
Should have it Tuesday. Since I have (counts) five clean shirts remaining, I expect I'll survive until then.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:54 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Susie at Monday, April 19 2004 10:23 AM (sf0L+)
2
I am always leery of whiz-bang that combines too many functions. What happens if the washer half of the gizmo craps out? You have to replace both.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at Monday, April 19 2004 10:51 AM (4819r)
3
Pppppt!
Consider also that if I'd bought a separate washer and dryer (of that brand) it would have cost about 40% more.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, April 19 2004 10:56 AM (+S1Ft)
4
Seems it would take a little longer, since you can't simultaneously wash a load while the dryer is running. The dryer is always the bottleneck. My dream laundry room would have two dryers. And a pretty laundry maid too, in a short frilly skirt. :)
Posted by: Ted at Tuesday, April 20 2004 10:16 AM (blNMI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Cooking Up A Storm
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:50 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Pixy, is there some template or something for links to all the mu.nu blogs? We're growing fast, and I cringe at the thought of adding all the new blogs to my blogroll manually...
Posted by: Sarah at Tuesday, April 20 2004 04:03 AM (S66t0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Sunday, April 18
Who Writes This Brap?
(Yeah, that's a typo, but I decided to leave it.)
As I've noted before, Movable Type is robust and rich in features, but really really slow.
I've wondered if it's something to do with using Berkeley DB. Some people on the MT support forum have claimed this is the case, but they have not impressed me as particularly knowledgable. Berkeley itself is very fast anyway, so it would have to be a problem with MT's use of it rather than Berkeley itself - though that is quite possible.
Anyway, there's a CGI script available in MT to convert from a Berkeley DB to MySQL or PostgreSQL. Two things to note: It only comes with the upgrade package, and not with the "full" version (minor oops), and it doesn't work (big oops).
Well, if you run it as the docs suggest, as a CGI program from your web browser, it will happily create the necessary tables in your SQL database and report that its work is done. Without, mind you, copying any of the data across.
If instead you run it from the command line, it will copy all your data, only very very slowly. It zips through the first part - I'm not sure exactly what that consisted of, but at least it was quick - but when it starts processing the entries it slows to a crawl. Crawwwwwwwwwl.
Once it's finished, which should be within the next 10 or 12 hours (seriously!), I'll rerun my little stress-test.
Oh, yes: I've written a template which exports your entire Movable Type system in a nice convenient format. Just the ticket if you want to move off MT and onto a more modern and efficient sytem. (Cough Minx cough.)
It takes two hours to run on mu.nu. That's on a lightly-loaded Athlon XP 2500+ with 1GB of memory.
Pfft. But at least it's better than mt-db2sql.cgi.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
06:24 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 322 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, April 18 2004 06:31 AM (+S1Ft)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, April 18 2004 06:43 AM (+S1Ft)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, April 18 2004 06:57 AM (+S1Ft)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, April 18 2004 07:27 AM (+S1Ft)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, April 18 2004 08:18 AM (+S1Ft)
6
About 45% - seems the speed has picked up a little.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, April 18 2004 09:49 AM (+S1Ft)
7
Oh dear - I hadn't realised MuNuvia was running on Berkley DB. I don't think the problem is with the Berkley system per se but I noticed a definite jump in performance since my move to the new server (and a MySQL backend) something in the region of 30% - 40% faster on rebuilds, comments etc.
Posted by: Rob at Sunday, April 18 2004 09:53 AM (BWDMP)
8
Yeah. But I haven't been able to get a definitive answer from anyone about whether MySQL really is faster than Berkeley - except from people who didn't know what they were talking about.
At least - assuming this conversion works - I'll have some hard performance data.
50%...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, April 18 2004 10:34 AM (+S1Ft)
9
I've run 5GB Berkeley databases and they worked just fine, so I really don't know what MT's problem is.
It
has to be either lousy design or lousy code. There's absolutely no reason for performance like this.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, April 18 2004 10:36 AM (+S1Ft)
10
75%
Assuming there isn't another stage after this one.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, April 18 2004 11:27 AM (+S1Ft)
11
It depends on the Berkeley version and the mySQL version. I've found mySQL runs somewhat faster, unless you are moving from the latest Berkeley to an older mySQL. Also depends on how the server is set up, etc. etc.
If it is a large (for a blog) database (say over 25 megabytes), I've found mySQL significantly faster. (All of the above is comment on MT blogs, specifically.) I've done about 15 conversions for people, so it's not a huge sample, just a bit better than a single conversion...
Posted by: Kathy K at Sunday, April 18 2004 11:48 AM (NqZv3)
12
Thanks for the info, Kathy. Yes, it's large (for, as you say, a blog) - over 160MB.
Another couple of hours and I'll be able to run my test, and we shall see what we shall see. (Though I'm still wondering what the hell it's doing that the conversion takes so long.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, April 18 2004 12:15 PM (+S1Ft)
13
Done copying data from Berkeley DB to your SQL database! All went well.
real 456m4.953s
user 7m51.430s
sys 0m48.630s
So, they put a sleep() call in there just to amuse themselves? Or what?
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, April 18 2004 01:44 PM (+S1Ft)
14
Well, my test is off and running. So far I can state confidently that MT running with MySQL is less than 50 times faster than MT with Berkeley DB. Which means that it is still too slow, but we will have to wait to find out whether it is faster, and by how much.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, April 18 2004 01:53 PM (+S1Ft)
15
Sainted Henry Fnord! Will you look at that!
(As soon as Trickle finishes trickling and buggers off...)
Oh, too late, it's gone.
Okay, two things:
One, my rebuild script runs (I think)
14 times faster with MySQL than with Berkeley DB. Now
that is worth a little pain.
Two, it used 880MB of memory. Eeek!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, April 18 2004 02:07 PM (+S1Ft)
16
I'm just confirming the timing by running my test on the live database again.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, April 18 2004 02:12 PM (+S1Ft)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Friday, April 16
Bookies!
Stopped by Galaxy Bookshop this evening when I was done comparison-shopping for washing machines. (I'm torn between the low price of the Simpson front-loader - my old washing machine was a Simpson and lasted 14 years without servicing - and the convenience and gadget-value of the Omega condensing washer/dryer - put your clothes in, press a few buttons, and a couple of hours later they are clean
and dry! Given that I have a bad habit of forgetting to take clothes out of the washing machine, sometimes for days, this is a good thing. It costs about twice as much as the Simpson, though.)
Well - (Oh, and I was reminded that I have a very small washing machine. Had a very small washing machine. Or have a very small ex-washing machine. Some of the models I looked at were huge. Convenient, I suppose, if you have three teenagers and a dog, but not something I need myself.)
Are you finished? (Yes, do go on.)
Right. Got to Galaxy and there's this huge pile near the door of Neal Stephenson's latest work, Confusion. It's the sequel to Quicksilver, which I hadn't bought previously, and both apparently have some connection to Cryptonomicon, which I never managed to get all the way through.
Stephenson is a good writer - I particularly enjoyed Zodiac and Snow Crash - but one of his points, for good or bad, is to wander off into diversions, sometimes for a dozen pages or more. (Speaking of which, most of my comparison shopping was done at Myers - what was Grace Bros., a fine and traditional name, before the mob from Melbourne bought them up. Actually, they've been trading as Grace Bros. for years even after that, but suddenly decided to change the name... A couple of months ago, I think. I sort of missed it, being occupied with other things. After that I went to Bing Lee, who have a new city store where the Sky Garden food court used to be. Wonder what they did with the food court... There used to be a restaurant there that did wonderful barbecue ribs. Anyway, Bing Lee is in theory a discount chain and Myers a mid-range department store, but the prices there were really no better than at Myers, and sometimes worse, and Myers were offering 10% off the marked price of all whitegoods.
What really struck me at Bing Lee, though, was the number of large-screen flat-panel televisions. They're everywhere. And they're not exactly cheap, so either people are buying these things and the economy isn't doing so badly after all or Bing Lee is about to go broke. I have a perfectly good Sony, a 34" model (84 cm to me) about six years old, which I bought just before the changeover to flat screens (flat CRTs, that is, rather than flat panels). It's vertically flat, at least; it's like a cut-away section of a cylinder, which is much easier to do without distorting the picture than a truly flat screen like my monitors. (Also Sony. Which have this horrible tendency to go over-bright over time - my third and final Sony monitor is not long for the world at this rate.)
I have no interest in buying a new TV, since my old one is both large enough and good enough, unless it is both high-definition and reasonably priced. And I have no real interest even then until high-definition material becomes available. And since I never watch broadcast TV these days and can't get cable because the cable companies are run by morons (I'm sure I've ranted about that here before) that means a new high-definition DVD player (which no-one currently makes) and new high-definition DVDs (see above). In the meantime, I have plenty of other ways to burn my money. I could buy a new washing machine, for a start.)
The diversions in Cryptonomicon, though, were rather too much for me. A friend noted how much he enjoyed the book, largely because of the diversions, which he found both entertaining and educational. For me, though, while they were amusing enough, my mind seems to run too closely to the same frequency as Stephenson's and my reaction after the first 400 diversion-packed pages was either get on with the story or I'm ditching the book.
He didn't, so I did. (One thing I did find, and which I have been looking for for some time, is a small, reasonably priced stereo that will play DVD-Rs full of MP3s. I don't know what appeals to you, but since a DVD-R costs me just over a dollar, and even with 256kb/s encoding will hold 40 hours of music, this seems very cool indeed to me. Pop in a disk, hit shuffle play, and that's music sorted out for the duration of the party.)
Now, though, I seem to be in the possession of both Quicksilver and Confusion, 1700 pages of 18th century diversions. (At least, I think it's 18th century. Benjamin Franklin's in it, I think.) And that's 1700 trade paperback pages, so it would probably be over 2000 in mass-market format. Not that there is a MMPB release yet - that I've seen. They're really milking this one.
Also Dan Simmons' Ilium. Dan Simmons is another writer I have mixed feelings about. His Hyperion is a fascinating work, a spin of Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales in a distant future on an enigmatic planet. The books that followed - The Fall of Hyperion, Endymion, and The Rise of Endymion, progressively rubbed away at the enigma until nothing much interesting was left. In fact, I never actually read the final volume, having given Endymion a resounding blah on the Pixy Misa BLO scale.*
Well, the Book Shop Guy recommended it very highly, and I have enjoyed some of Simmons' recent non-SF work (specifically Hardcase and Hard Freeze. Darwin's Blade, on the other hand, was clearly written entirely on autopilot. It made me wonder if he has a word processor with functions to insert 500 words on guns here and ramble on about auto engines for 800 words there.), so I bought it too.
And Steven Brust's Sethra Lavode. I don't really have any conflicts about Brust - He's brilliant! Read him! - but this latest work, the third part of his homage to Dumas (The Phoenix Guards being The Three Musketeers, Five Hundred Years After being Twenty Years After among an elf-like race that lives a lot longer than we humans are wont to do, and The Viscount of Adrilankha being of course The Vicomte De Bragelonne. Viscount is itself split into three volumes, namely, The Paths of the Dead, The Lord of Castle Black, and this, the third. Sethra Lavode, remember?) hasn't grabbed me in the same way, possibly because it is divided into three parts like Gaul, and is filled with garlicky snails.
Or possibly just because the parts of what should be a single novel are appearing a year apart, just long enough for the previous volume to fade in the mind but not quite long enough for it to be an attractive re-read. I didn't finish The Lord of Castle Black because I really needed to re-read The Paths of the Dead to enjoy it properly, only I didn't. Now I have all three volumes in hand, and can do the work justice - and I just need to find the time.
Finally, Guy Gavriel Kay's The Last Light of the Sun. Guy Kay is one of my (many) favourite fantasy authors. Though admittedly his first work, The Fionavar Tapestry, was something of a mess (belonging to the fling fantasy tropes at the page and see what sticks school of writing), he redeemed himself and more with Tigana. His writing has improved since then, with A Song for Arbonne, The Lions of Al-Rassan, and most recently The Sarantine Mosaic, but none of those have resonated with me quite the way Tigana does.
Partly, it's the settings. Tigana has some vague flavour of the warring Italian states of, say, the 15th century, but it's clearly its own world, not just Italy with the names filed off. Arbonne is France, more or less, but again not just a cut-and-paste. Al-Rassan, though, is obviously Moorish Spain, and Sarantium is Byzantium, Constantinople, without any real effort to distinguish or disguise it.
I don't like that very much, even when the writing is good - and in Kay's case, it is.
More than that, though, there's the theme of Tigana: A country, defeated in war, and punished for its resistence by having its name taken away, wiped from the memories of its people by magic. And of the struggle of those few who remember to reclaim the memory of their land for their people. This struck me as a terribly, terribly painful thing - to be unable to recall the name of your own land, the land that you grew up in and loved. If you enjoy fantasy and haven't yet read Tigana, do. Even if you've read Fionavar and have since sworn off Kay's work - which would be akin to reading The Number of the Beast and swearing off Heinlein, as one of my friends did for years.
So, and so; 1700 pages of Stephenson, 600 of Simmons, 350 pages of Brust, who is normally commendably succinct, unless I should decide to re-read the whole of Viscount in which case the number is closer to 1100, and 500 pages of Kay.
If you don't hear much from me in the next few days, well, I'll be in the laundry.
* Book-Like Object. A term used to describe things printed on paper and bound between covers that cannot justly be described as books.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:52 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 1627 words, total size 10 kb.
1
So did you buy a washer?
Recommended reading:
http://www.dfunkd.com/dramaqueen/archives/000737.html
Posted by: Susie at Friday, April 16 2004 12:16 PM (sf0L+)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, April 16 2004 12:28 PM (+S1Ft)
3
If you didn't like Cryptonomicon there's a good chance you won't like Quicksilver, it's mostly diversions.
Posted by: Matt Navarre at Friday, April 16 2004 03:03 PM (+7Usq)
4
No surprise there, since it's Stephenson after all. But hopefully it's diversions on topics that I don't know so much about. In Cryptonomicon, it was
yes, I know that, now get on with the story.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Saturday, April 17 2004 02:58 AM (kOqZ6)
5
It shouldn't surprise you that I love the diversions, as my entire blog is one long off-on-a-tangent. However, Neal Stephenson could write a laundry list (and speaking of washers, get one in a pretty color, because it makes mucking about with dirty socks much less depressing) and I'd read it. I am getting Quicksliver and Confusion when they come out in paperback, and I have two copies of Cryptonomicon in case I lose one.
I do that all the time. I currently have six copies of Neuromancer.
Posted by: LeeAnn at Saturday, April 17 2004 10:24 AM (HxCeX)
6
Simmons and Hyperion - I loved the first one, but each one following was a little less fun to read. I could never put my finger on why though, but you pegged it.
Come to think of it, that's how I felt about Varley's Wizard/Titan/whatever-else-was-in-that-trilogy too.
Posted by: Ted at Saturday, April 17 2004 11:01 AM (blNMI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thursday, April 15
This Is Still My Blog
There aren't any quite like it, and this one is mine all mine.
Happy 1th birthday Ambient Irony!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
12:14 AM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Happy AnniverseYay!
Now about uploading my blogspot posts...?
Posted by: spacemonkey at Thursday, April 15 2004 12:25 AM (qSKHX)
2
Happy Happy Blogday!
:)
Rae
Posted by: Rae at Thursday, April 15 2004 12:45 AM (3NWby)
Posted by: John Lanius at Thursday, April 15 2004 01:23 AM (QpV7d)
4
Very happy 1st birthday. How are you going to top your first year?
Posted by: Simon at Thursday, April 15 2004 01:54 AM (GWTmv)
5
Yay!!!! Many happy returns!!!
Posted by: Susie at Thursday, April 15 2004 01:58 AM (sf0L+)
6
YAY!
What an amazing first year!
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at Thursday, April 15 2004 07:09 AM (4819r)
7
It's your Blogversary! Yay! Happy, happy!
Posted by: Attila Girl at Thursday, April 15 2004 07:19 AM (SYwua)
8
Yay! Happy Blogversary!
Posted by: Jim at Thursday, April 15 2004 07:28 AM (saeHM)
9
And here's to many more to come!
Yay Pixy!
Posted by: Ted at Thursday, April 15 2004 08:53 AM (ZjSa7)
10
Yay! Happy Blogiverary Pixy!
Posted by: Daniel at Thursday, April 15 2004 09:14 AM (Oc6V9)
11
Yay!!11! Happy D'Day, Mr Pixy!!
Posted by: Madfish Willie at Thursday, April 15 2004 04:20 PM (hF7Sz)
12
Wow.
I'd say that you've been quite prolific for a one year old. ; )
Posted by: Key at Thursday, April 15 2004 04:47 PM (nem6m)
Posted by: Ith at Thursday, April 15 2004 06:03 PM (Xk83I)
14
Happy blogiversary! Yay!!!!!!!
Posted by: CD at Thursday, April 15 2004 07:58 PM (23BBG)
Posted by: Tim from Backstage at Friday, April 16 2004 12:18 AM (MIKev)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Saturday, April 17 2004 02:53 AM (kOqZ6)
17
Happy Belated Blogday, Pixy!
Hoorayyyy!
Posted by: Linda at Saturday, April 17 2004 07:38 PM (ktJme)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wednesday, April 14
Bonfire!
Gonna be a bonfire tonight, a bonfire tonight,
I know,
I know...
Gooood evening ladies and germs, and welcome one and all to the Bonfire of the Vanities!
I'm your host, The Extremely Reverend Pixy Misa, and tonight we will be sacrificing our most worthless, our most inane, our most incoherent babblings to the flames! And if things get a little carried away, possibly a blogger or two as well!
Right, who's up first?
...
Shy crowd, eh? Well, I'll just draw a name out of the hat. Oh, look! It's
Susie of
Practical Penumbra, who takes great pride in
connecting the dots with... the other dots. Burn for me, Susie!
And now we have John Moore of
Useful Fools who tries to contribute by
throwing a couple of Democrats into the fire! Don't
be silly, John! We all know that politicians are too wet to burn!
Competing in our Inane Remark category is Sean Hackbarth of
The American Mind who informs us that
the head of the NBA is an InstaPundit
reader. Or that someone who isn't the head of the NBA is an IsntaPundit
reader. Or something.
In our Put not thy faith in weathermen category we have Kiril Kundurazieff of
Sneakeasy's Joint complaining that
sometimes it will rain even if the guy on TV
said it wouldn't!! We all hate that, right? Right! Into the flames with it, Kiril!
Michael Friedman of
Fried Man regretfully informs us that Kevin Drum has
SOLD OUT! and is now pimping for the Global Sorority
Conspiracy! Hey, Michael, how come we never get invited to those parties?
Oh, never mind. Burn, baby, burn!
Can't keep up with what's going on in the sports world any more? Don't worry! Beth Donovan of
She Who Will Be Obeyed Or Else Dammit is here to fill us all in on the
latest news from, um,
Augusta, maybe? I dunno. One of
those places.
Andrew Ian Dodge of
Dodgeblogium has -
Aah! My eyes! Ze goggles, they do nothing!
And while you're recovering from that, we have a competitor in the Non-Sequitur category. Meet Jim
from
Snoozebutton Dreams who tells us about
a show that he cannot describe and therefore,
doesn't.
Into the fire with him! Oops, no, just the post... Oh well.
The inimitable Harvey of
Bad Money looks for blogging inspiration to
Bad Dog Jake - who is, alas, an actual dog and
so inspires only more fodder for the bonfire...
Not that that is a bad thing.
Photon Courier, apparently mistaking the Bonfire for the Carnival,
sends us a fine post noting the similarities between
idiots now and
sixty years ago. Let's toss it in the flames anyway!
Alex of
Hypocrisy and Hypotheses explains to us the difference between
a buffalo's fingers and a buddy... Or
possibly not. Burn it anyway! Bwahahahahahahaah - cough!
Ah... Has anyone been putting any, mmm, substances, in the fire? If so, see me after the show stop
it right now!
Goldie the
Drama Queen has let herself grow addicted to
frogs balls. But she tells us she's doing just
fine in therapy and will be out in no time!
Meanwhile, Comrade Dave of
Blogo Slovo makes it known that he
does not want to turn into
a giant Iguana. At least, not a small-town giant Iguana. A big city giant Iguana, that's different.
Burn it! Burn it!
Bryan of
Spare Change
watches The Bachelor. But he tells us he's doing
just fine in therapy and will be out in no time!
Is it hot in here, or is it just me? Why did we build the Bonfire indoors, by the way?
Nathan of
The Argus manages to link Turkmenistan (which he claims is a real
country) and the Cavity Creeps (who we know are real)
together in a single post, endangering
the very existence of Reality unless we take swift action by throwing it into the fire!
Always works, that. Reality endangered? Into the fire!
...
The
Gleeful Extremist recommends that
we all see Cheaper by the
Dozen. Uh, and that's about it. Sure burns well, though. Flames, so pretty...
Brian takes time out from his musings to tell us
that he is outraged!
Absolutely outraged! And if you act now, he'll throw in a free set of steak knives!
Heather, perhaps you could have a quiet word with your husband?
Eric of
Classical Values is
decapitating chocolate bunnies for peace!
And something about Ishtar and Indymedia, but it's already burnt, so we won't worry about that.
The
Interested Participant attempts to convince us that
snakes evolved from lawyers, when we all know that snakes
really evolved from insurance salesmen. Nice try, IP, but it's into the flames you go!
Crackle crackle burn burn...
The Princess of Fools, from the
Kingdom of Fools has
some very insightful commentary for us, so daddy decides
to offer it up for the Bonfire. Just you wait, your Kingness!
In the It seemed amusing at the time category we have contestent Kevin of
Wizbang who tells us that Arnold
rescued a struggling swimmer. And, well, that's basically
it. Arnold rescued a struggling swimmer.
Bill Bulldog, posting from
Beyond the Black Hole,
explains the Olympics to us. At least, I think he
explained the Olympics to us. Not always easy to tell.
And, finally, we have
Chapomatic who tells us that he has, indeed,
seen everything.
Oh look! The nice gentlemen in the shiny red trucks have arrived! If anyone wants me, I'll be 'round the back!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
07:49 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 918 words, total size 11 kb.
1
nicely torched there Pixy :)
Posted by: goldie at Wednesday, April 14 2004 11:52 AM (QFwud)
2
Guess I didn't get my post in in time. C'est la vie.
Posted by: J at Wednesday, April 14 2004 12:39 PM (G/h0s)
3
Ah, well, J. I'll send you a box of matches.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, April 14 2004 12:49 PM (+S1Ft)
4
Great confligration!!!!!! ;)
Posted by: Susie at Wednesday, April 14 2004 12:51 PM (sf0L+)
5
Bill loves attention. You ought to see him wag his butt (he really doesn't have a tail) whenever anyone mentions his name> I will have to tell him he hit the big time today!
Posted by: Mr Mouse at Wednesday, April 14 2004 05:40 PM (JCxVY)
Posted by: Madfish Willie at Thursday, April 15 2004 06:05 PM (hF7Sz)
7
Ouch! I'm scorched 'n torched!
Posted by: Eric Scheie at Friday, April 16 2004 01:57 AM (ysmDT)
8
Thanks very much for the conflagration!
I will endeavor mightily to post more flammable material, as it actually got linked! I'm not alone! Oh, joy!
Posted by: Chap at Saturday, April 17 2004 01:16 AM (KkgkB)
Posted by: online casinos at Friday, May 28 2004 09:40 AM (zechr)
10
Pssst..... In lated 2007 I quite writing all my "worthless, inane, and incoherent babblings on Sneakeasy's, and started doing it on a new blog. ;-D
Musings of a Mad Macedonian (Just Click my name)
To make matters worse, my Cat, Nikita, who had been my co-blogger, opened up his own blog last January, and HIS "worthless, inane, and incoherent babblings", are far more popular than mine! ;-D
Meowsings of an Opinionated Pussycat
Posted by: Kiril Kundurazieff at Sunday, November 21 2010 11:43 AM (sIQ+1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Tuesday, April 13
That's Reverend Pixy To You, Buster
As of this morning, I am a duly ordained minister of the
Universal Life Church of Modesto, California.
No, really.
Since the tenets of the ULC are human rights, personal responsibility, and religious freedom - including freedom from religious dogma - this is something I take with a certain degree of seriousness. Yes, it's partly in fun, but it's not to make fun of the ULC, more the humour in me (me!) being a priest.
So...
Anyone want to get married? (Not necessarily to me.) Or baptised?
Just so people know, I'm not licensed to perform circumcisions, but apart from that, I'm ready for anything!
Bless you, kiddies!
Reverend Pixy
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:18 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 122 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hey, me too! I got mine over the weekend. We could start the Church of Mu...
Posted by: Jim at Tuesday, April 13 2004 10:36 PM (saeHM)
2
So is the door completely shut to marrying you?
Posted by: Jennifer at Wednesday, April 14 2004 12:38 AM (rZmE1)
3
Um. No, though I'm not sure I can officiate at my own wedding, so we might have to ask Jim. Or Paul, or Bill.
As you can see, there's a certain risk involved there.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, April 14 2004 12:46 AM (kOqZ6)
4
OK, if everyone else is doing this, I'd better go over there. Don't want to be the only non-reverand.
Posted by: Simon at Wednesday, April 14 2004 02:25 AM (GWTmv)
5
I've attended at least four weddings officiated at by mail-order ministers. Most of these guys were "ordained" through the ULC.
Posted by: Attila Girl at Wednesday, April 14 2004 04:06 AM (SYwua)
6
Congrats Pixy!
It reaffirms my faith in cosmic balance... Bill on one side, you on the other. Yin and Yang.
Jim and Paul I consider free radicals, looking to upset things in a general way.
Posted by: Ted at Wednesday, April 14 2004 08:47 AM (blNMI)
Posted by: Susie at Wednesday, April 14 2004 10:24 AM (sf0L+)
8
If you can't do circumcisions, can you do breast reductions?
Just in case.
Posted by: LeeAnn at Wednesday, April 14 2004 11:17 AM (HxCeX)
9
Way to go! I'm a ULC minister myself, same with my husband AND my Dad. Nice to meet'cha! :-)
--TwoDragons
Posted by: Denita TwoDragons at Wednesday, April 14 2004 08:16 PM (fGB25)
10
Can you perform exorcisms? If so, can it be done by email?
Posted by: Interested-Participant at Thursday, April 15 2004 04:35 PM (AaBEz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Holy Flame
The Bonfire entries are still rolling in, and I'm heading off to work now, so expect the Bonfire to appear in this space about ten hours from... Now.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:05 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
Monday, April 12
Bonfires R Us
I'm still splitting wood and gathering tinder, so you have time yet to put your entry in for this week's Bonfire of the Vanities.
So gather up your most inane, nonsensical blather and email it to bonfire at wizbangblog.com, along with any explanation you may have for its wretched existence. (Your post, that is, not Wizbang.)
Sacrifice your offerings to the Burning Blog!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
05:44 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I sent mine--and I think it's self-explanatory...
Posted by: Susie at Tuesday, April 13 2004 12:32 PM (sf0L+)
2
Yep, got yours and a dozen others. I'll be posting the Bonfire tonight when I get home from work.
Hey, this page has
two sitemeters! How'd that happen?
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, April 13 2004 12:35 PM (+S1Ft)
3
And now it only has one! Waaah!
Bonk!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, April 13 2004 12:36 PM (+S1Ft)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
New Faces
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:06 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 4 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Damn Pixy,
What cool pictures! I'm thinking about liberating that Pic for my blog (with your permission of course) at least until I come up with something original of my own.
Posted by: Johnny - Oh at Tuesday, April 13 2004 02:39 AM (Nl2WO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Sunday, April 11
Support John Kelly!

(Thanks to Wizbang Kevin)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
07:06 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 10 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yes, damnit! I think you're right!
Bwhahahahah.
Posted by: Emma at Monday, April 12 2004 12:18 AM (kpNlZ)
2
Thank you for Blogging for Kerry! There are too few and far between of us, in the blogging world, or so it seems. Cheers and here's to taking our country back!
Posted by: brian kinney at Monday, April 12 2004 12:58 AM (UuhpC)
3
You guys are terrific. Evil, but in a very good way!
Poor Brian Killey . . . he'll never be a proofreader.
Posted by: Attila Girl at Monday, April 12 2004 03:19 AM (SYwua)
4
Point being: The more republicans campaign for Kerry, the less we will have to campaign for ourselves. I'm all in favor of it. ;)
But then again, you probably want four more years of war and recession, huh?
BTW - Since we're on the topic of proofreading, you spelled by last name wrong.
Posted by: brian kinney at Wednesday, April 14 2004 05:38 AM (UuhpC)
5
Yes, we evil Republicans are campaigning for Kerry all right..to be President of France. We do not have the time, moral flexibility, or that big of a lack of Islamist terrorists (Trick question: Which man could not call Hamas and Hizbollah "terrorists organizations," George W. Bush or John Kerry?) to elect such a man to be President of the United States. And yes, we are in a war and the only way to end it is to defeat and destroy the bastards who declared war on us, not trying to say "I don't like calling it a "war"."
As for recession...Only if you also thought Bill Clinton was in a recession for his eight years in the White House.
John Kerry for President! (..Of France.)
C.T.
Posted by: C.T. at Wednesday, April 14 2004 02:23 PM (l/+t2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Saturday, April 10
I'll Drink to That!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
01:37 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
142kb generated in 0.2042 seconds; 71 queries returned 392 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.