Wednesday, January 23

Geek

Daily News Stuff 23 January 2019

Tech News


Social Media News



Anime Op/Ed of the Day



Picture of the Day

https://ai.mee.nu/images/ThePain.jpg?size=720x&q=95

Nyawm.



Disclaimer: It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself—anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an improper expression on your face (to look incredulous when a victory was announced, for example) was itself a punishable offence. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: facecrime, it was called.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at 05:11 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 665 words, total size 6 kb.

1 Ugh, that security article is awful.  According to the summary you can magically pwn a device without connecting to it, "every five minutes".  There doesn't seem to be an explanation of what that last part means, but if you go far enough, you'll discover (if I am reading it correctly) you need a second exploit to steal control of the wifi soc and use it to attack the host system (the sample exploit uses the soc to plant harmless messages in the  Linux kernel log.)

Posted by: Rick C at Thursday, January 24 2019 01:26 AM (Q/JG2)

2 Yeah, it's nasty but not PANIC STATIONS nasty.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, January 24 2019 01:28 AM (PiXy!)

3 Oh--reading a bit more, it appears that the affected soc will scan for other wireless networks automatically every 5 minutes, without user interaction.  I've always thought that was a bit silly--you probably shouldn't be searching for networks unless the user initiates it.
IIUC, a second wifi device is used to send carefully-crafted wifi frames at the target device, designed to cause a buffer overflow and remote code execution.  Once you've pwned the wifi soc, you use injected code to attack the host system (over the SDIO bus, somehow).

Posted by: Rick C at Thursday, January 24 2019 01:31 AM (Q/JG2)

4 Re the Chromium adblockpocalypse:  I see this as driving people back to things like Proxomitron.
Something like Proxo has a huge advantage over adblockers-as-extensions as it can prevent stuff from ever getting to the browser, whereas extensions can only examine data after it's been downloaded.  That would, as one example, allow adblocking for Chrome on Android, which you can't do now as it doesn't have extensions.  (I tried FF for Android for a while because it did, but it's just too painful to use, mainly because the default fonts are too small)

Posted by: Rick C at Thursday, January 24 2019 01:36 AM (Q/JG2)

5 Standalone cameras and drones are other obvious beneficiaries of speedy flash.

Posted by: Rick C at Thursday, January 24 2019 01:38 AM (Q/JG2)

6 Regarding the disclaimer: Make Orwell Fiction Again.

Posted by: muon at Wednesday, January 30 2019 03:58 PM (vMYTH)

7 That MOFA hat ought to come with a partial mask so you can't be recognized on camera.

Posted by: Rick C at Thursday, January 31 2019 10:49 AM (Iwkd4)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




Apple pies are delicious. But never mind apple pies. What colour is a green orange?




57kb generated in CPU 0.0473, elapsed 0.1234 seconds.
58 queries taking 0.1148 seconds, 353 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.