Sunday, August 17
Daily News Stuff 17 August 2025
Communist Propaganda Board Of America Edition
Communist Propaganda Board Of America Edition
Top Story
- A federal judge has blocked the FTC's investigation into Media Matters' illegal activity. (Tech Crunch)
Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan - I swear I am not making this up - said that nothing Media Matters was doing was illegal and in any case they had already stopped with most of the illegal stuff.
- A brazen attack on air safety is under way. (The Verge) (archive site)
If you saw "The Verge" and guessed they were screeching inanely about the Trump administration, you can collect your Kewpie doll in aisle five, next to the mayonnaise.
Tech News
- Sony seems to be learning, slowly: Fairgame$, set to be the company's next computer game mega-flop (Sony earlier released Concord, which cost $400 million to make and earned $0) has been quietly strangled. (WCCFTech)
A huge loss of all the news channels who were looking forward to making fun of this one.
- SD Express is a new standard for mini storage. (Liliputing)
Slightly larger than micro SD, it supports PCI Express 4.0 x2 for transfer rates up to 3.7GB per second. Launch devices have capacities up to 2TB.
Both of which used to be a lot.
Musical Interlude
Disclaimer: Come and get your love. Blue light special now on in aisle six!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
06:24 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 221 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Look, frenz, the ICAO is dangerously insubordinate to the FAA, so we probably need to nuke the ICAO managed airports to make air travel safe again.
(If you think I am serious, I may need to work harder to go over the top.)
My true position is that I would need to familiarize myself with stats to really understand if a specific incident is unusual, or should be unusual. I think the media overhypes. I think that there would always be an excess of safety incidents following shutting down most of the economy for no good reason.
Also, the universities have fucked up the university business, and that would always have cost and expense for university trained experts and 'experts'.
I can be sympathetic to the view that the FAA should be a jobs program for me, for a bunch of engineers, and for some scientists. However, engineers have a major problem now when it comes to telling the public to do expensive things. The public has a very licit set of reasons to have a negative response if that an engineer does not work to be persuasive beyond 'because I say so'.
I think the bad actors from universities have been, or could be, expensive enough that refusal to consult relatively sound people could be worthwhile in the broader picture.
And the Biden regime pushed through a political and stupid effort to electrify aviation propulsion. There's a case that such could have justified reeeing over the safety hit of the lost opportunities to build safe conventional turbines.
(If you think I am serious, I may need to work harder to go over the top.)
My true position is that I would need to familiarize myself with stats to really understand if a specific incident is unusual, or should be unusual. I think the media overhypes. I think that there would always be an excess of safety incidents following shutting down most of the economy for no good reason.
Also, the universities have fucked up the university business, and that would always have cost and expense for university trained experts and 'experts'.
I can be sympathetic to the view that the FAA should be a jobs program for me, for a bunch of engineers, and for some scientists. However, engineers have a major problem now when it comes to telling the public to do expensive things. The public has a very licit set of reasons to have a negative response if that an engineer does not work to be persuasive beyond 'because I say so'.
I think the bad actors from universities have been, or could be, expensive enough that refusal to consult relatively sound people could be worthwhile in the broader picture.
And the Biden regime pushed through a political and stupid effort to electrify aviation propulsion. There's a case that such could have justified reeeing over the safety hit of the lost opportunities to build safe conventional turbines.
Posted by: PatBuckman at Sunday, August 17 2025 11:25 PM (rcPLc)
51kb generated in CPU 0.1019, elapsed 0.1665 seconds.
58 queries taking 0.1573 seconds, 360 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
58 queries taking 0.1573 seconds, 360 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.









