Monday, April 11
Daily News Stuff 11 April 2022
Hold The Roomba Edition
Hold The Roomba Edition
Top Story
- Contract for the house came through at around 5pm. Have a call with my lawyer scheduled for noon tomorrow to go over a couple of details.
- Silicon Valley billionaires plan to turn Twitter HQ into a homeless shelter.* (Bloomberg / MSN)
Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Marc Andreeson are backing the plan, as are 91% of Twitter users.
* You mean it wasn't already?
Tech News
- Sonic the Hedgehog 2 had a $71 million opening weekend - the best ever for a film adapted from a video gam. (MSN)
Why should you care?
Because the initial cut of the first movie was a train wreck - and they listened to fans, fixed it, and now have a hit sequel.
Also, it probably took in more at the box office in that one weekend than all the recent Oscar nominees combined.
- Here are all he annoying changes you can avoid this year by remaining on Windows 10. (Bleeping Computer)
Neat.
- TVs suck. (ZDNet)
"Jump ads give participating programmers and brands the ability to present an interactive overlay at the conclusion of linear TV programs, directing viewers into a supporting app on Vizio's operating system to continue their viewing experience," Vizio said.
They're one step away from blipverts.
And if you think a premier brand like Samsung might be better you're going to have a really bad time with your new $3000 in-home billboard.
I'm looking at a 48" OLED monitor for the new place. It has plenty of room for something bigger, but there aren't many monitors larger than that.
Disclaimer: Shift fifteen boxes full of books and what do you get? A broken toe from when you dropped one of them and you weren't wearing shoes.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
07:07 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 296 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Something I've wondered about smart TVs... isn't it pretty easy to render them "dumb" by just not letting them have access to your wi-fi network? Maybe that won't work if you were counting on using "smart" features, but how common is that, anyway?
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at Tuesday, April 12 2022 02:56 AM (NoOEO)
2
Avatar: There are various ways. Perhaps you give the Smart TV a fake IP address that's completely outside your network range, and don't connect it to your physical or wireless network, and make sure your wireless network is properly secured against unknown devices. Ban the TV's mac address on your router for good measure*.
Alternatively, create a little network for it using a Raspberry Pi which provides a DHCP and DNS server, and will happily resolve its own address and the tv's address but anything else it returns 127.0.0.1 for.
This doesn't solve what to do if a Smart TV manufacturer builds in a wireless network card and if it can't successfully connect to its command and control node through the settings you supply, then starts scanning all available wireless networks it can see and tries to connect through those. As soon as it hits someone's open/unsecured network it will use that, and suddenly you're in the advertising swamp. Someone will try this dirty trick at some point. Hell, I'm counting on someone nefarious setting up an open honeypot network with malware just to screw with people and their devices.
{*} Side story, I had to ban a neighbour's smart-bulb from a Chinese comany called Tuya because it kept trying to hammer my wireless network with connection requests, even though the network is locked down and they don't have the encryption key. The firmware is so stupid, it will just keep trying forever and it was degrading my network performance. So I banned it from the wireless router and wireless access point via mac address and that helped. Apparently this stupid smart-bulb goes for the strongest wireless signal it can find, and then gets fixated on it and won't attempt to connect to anything else. Yes, they're that bad.
Alternatively, create a little network for it using a Raspberry Pi which provides a DHCP and DNS server, and will happily resolve its own address and the tv's address but anything else it returns 127.0.0.1 for.
This doesn't solve what to do if a Smart TV manufacturer builds in a wireless network card and if it can't successfully connect to its command and control node through the settings you supply, then starts scanning all available wireless networks it can see and tries to connect through those. As soon as it hits someone's open/unsecured network it will use that, and suddenly you're in the advertising swamp. Someone will try this dirty trick at some point. Hell, I'm counting on someone nefarious setting up an open honeypot network with malware just to screw with people and their devices.
{*} Side story, I had to ban a neighbour's smart-bulb from a Chinese comany called Tuya because it kept trying to hammer my wireless network with connection requests, even though the network is locked down and they don't have the encryption key. The firmware is so stupid, it will just keep trying forever and it was degrading my network performance. So I banned it from the wireless router and wireless access point via mac address and that helped. Apparently this stupid smart-bulb goes for the strongest wireless signal it can find, and then gets fixated on it and won't attempt to connect to anything else. Yes, they're that bad.
Posted by: Grumpy and Recalcitrant at Tuesday, April 12 2022 03:47 AM (nRMeC)
3
Some of the "smart" TV's will show a blank or config screen, or at a minimum a popup "please connect" message mid-screen, if you don't have them connected.
Posted by: David Eastman at Tuesday, April 12 2022 03:50 AM (qSKtI)
4
I have one where you can't completely disable wifi, and if you don't give it the password for yours, it will connect to any open nearby access point. I put it on my guest wifi and then blocked its IP address at the router.
-j
-j
Posted by: J Greely at Tuesday, April 12 2022 03:50 AM (ZlYZd)
5
Nothing in what I suggested helps you if the Smart TV insists on a working internet connection or the TV will refuse to function. I'm betting there are already some in this category.
Pixy's on to one of the possible solutions: Buy a big computer monitor that isn't infected with "Smart TV" firmware. Yes it will cost more, and it's worth it.
Another possible solution (which will also cost more than the residential market Smart TV) would be to buy a television intended for commercial customers (hospitals for their in-house television viewing in patient and waiting rooms, corporate conference rooms, two-way video conferencing, fast food restaurant digital menus/in-house advertising, etc...) There is no way those customers are going to accept pushed advertising from third parties into their environments.
Pixy's on to one of the possible solutions: Buy a big computer monitor that isn't infected with "Smart TV" firmware. Yes it will cost more, and it's worth it.
Another possible solution (which will also cost more than the residential market Smart TV) would be to buy a television intended for commercial customers (hospitals for their in-house television viewing in patient and waiting rooms, corporate conference rooms, two-way video conferencing, fast food restaurant digital menus/in-house advertising, etc...) There is no way those customers are going to accept pushed advertising from third parties into their environments.
Posted by: Grumpy and Recalcitrant at Tuesday, April 12 2022 04:27 AM (nRMeC)
6
Aha, I see David and J Greely already replied while I was writing my second reply.
David: So no function other than "please connect" if it can't connect to the internet? That sucks. (I hate it when I'm right.)
J: Yeah, that's about all you can do, play ball with it for a couple of minutes and then throw it in network jail and hope it doesn't throw a hissy fit afterwards.
David: So no function other than "please connect" if it can't connect to the internet? That sucks. (I hate it when I'm right.)
J: Yeah, that's about all you can do, play ball with it for a couple of minutes and then throw it in network jail and hope it doesn't throw a hissy fit afterwards.
Posted by: Grumpy and Recalcitrant at Tuesday, April 12 2022 04:30 AM (nRMeC)
7
"Blipverts" Pixy, you are old. No one remembers tha....what that on the..................................................
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Tuesday, April 12 2022 04:55 AM (5iiQK)
8
Someone willing to put enough effort into dealing with a TV that refuses to work if it can't connect might do so by setting up a fake server. "Nope, I have no firmware updates for you. Sure, I'll take (and dump) any reported info you send." It will, of course, be more complex than that.
Posted by: Rick C at Tuesday, April 12 2022 05:04 AM (Z0GF0)
9
Brickmuppet: I remember blipverts. That pilot episode predicted things scarily well. Take away the actual blipvert-effect, and you saw a television with a camera and microphone capable of viewing the viewer, identifying him, his family, his location, his economic status... and selecting an advertisement for him based on all of that. Once again I find myself saying: "These dystopian fictions were supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual!"
Rick: The amount of work involved in that would be into the "hacking for learning's sake" territory; very much effort for very little payoff. If you tried to make money by selling devices to fake the company's server(s), said company would probably engage in lawfare to try to shut you down via court judgement, or draw out the trial process to bankrupt you so you'd give up and stop threatening their business model. It would start with an accusation of breaking their "digital lock" per the DMCA (oh how I hate that particular law's overreach.)
Rick: The amount of work involved in that would be into the "hacking for learning's sake" territory; very much effort for very little payoff. If you tried to make money by selling devices to fake the company's server(s), said company would probably engage in lawfare to try to shut you down via court judgement, or draw out the trial process to bankrupt you so you'd give up and stop threatening their business model. It would start with an accusation of breaking their "digital lock" per the DMCA (oh how I hate that particular law's overreach.)
Posted by: Grumpy and Recalcitrant at Tuesday, April 12 2022 05:19 AM (nRMeC)
10
It looks like 4K projectors aren't infected with "smarts" yet, so when I build out the home theater in my basement next year, that's what I'll be looking at.
Rick, the fake server can work for things that are too stupid to use encryption (sadly, still a lot of those out there), but given that someone recently asked, "hey, why does my internet-connected Nespresso coffee maker listen on the OpenVPN port", I suspect most of them are being built around either BusyBox or Android, and have an SSL client cert baked into the firmware that validates the server they're talking to, and vice versa.
-j
Rick, the fake server can work for things that are too stupid to use encryption (sadly, still a lot of those out there), but given that someone recently asked, "hey, why does my internet-connected Nespresso coffee maker listen on the OpenVPN port", I suspect most of them are being built around either BusyBox or Android, and have an SSL client cert baked into the firmware that validates the server they're talking to, and vice versa.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at Tuesday, April 12 2022 05:22 AM (ZlYZd)
58kb generated in CPU 0.0185, elapsed 0.0995 seconds.
58 queries taking 0.0915 seconds, 349 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
58 queries taking 0.0915 seconds, 349 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
