Wednesday, September 05
Previously in As the Worm Turns, we discussed how the jury in the case had ignored instructions from the judge and assessed damages to punish Samsung rather than to reflect actual financial harm upon Apple.
I think he may have a valid point. Perhaps apple have invented some new numbers, like eleventy-four, that don't fit into the old computers properly due to magic and stuff.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
12:16 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 186 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Thursday, September 06 2012 10:32 AM (+rSRq)
...then he decided to show his brilliance off to the public, too. Oops.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at Thursday, September 06 2012 11:06 AM (fpXGN)
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at Thursday, September 06 2012 08:13 PM (GJQTS)
I think somewhere in the corporate offices of Apple and its lawyers, multiple voices are screaming every time the jury foreman appears in an interview, trying to get him to shut his mouth. It seems that every new interview conducted with the man since the verdict has seen him digging himself a deeper and deeper hole to drop into.
I do not believe the bad judgement of jurors is a crime, but this guy has been getting close to being a poster child for everything a juror can intentionally do wrong. Still not the worst examples available, but that is not a compliment.
Posted by: cxt217 at Friday, September 07 2012 06:47 AM (YM5S2)
Bad judgement by a juror is not a crime. But if it can be determined that he had a conflict of interest, and didn't say so when he was being questioned as a candidate, I think that is potentially a crime. (Perjury, if nothing else.)
I don't see how this leads to the whole case being dismissed, however. There is no "double jeopardy" rule in civil law.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Friday, September 07 2012 11:11 AM (+rSRq)
56 queries taking 0.4894 seconds, 348 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.