Friday, February 25
Ah, good work, Intel engineer dudes.
I'd heard of Light Peak, Intel's future desktop I/O technology set to replace USB and Firewire and eSATA. I hadn't looked into it all that closely, and what I didn't realise is that it's a rejiggered version of DisplayPort.
DisplayPort is actually a modern display interface. VGA is just a standard connector for age-old separate colour and sync connections. DVI is digital VGA - it actually incorporates horizontal and vertical retrace intervals. HDMI is just a different cable for DVI with a sideband for audio.
DisplayPort is a packetised 10Gbps (and more recently, 20Gbps) general-purpose I/O interconnect that just happens to be sold as a video connector.
Light Peak, now renamed Thunderbolt, extends this to offer two bi-directional 10Gbps channels per port that can carry PCIe and DisplayPort data simultaneously. You can daisy-chain up to seven devices (including two 2560x1600 monitors) per port. And the standard Thunderbolt socket is identical to mini-DisplayPort, and works as that if you plug a DisplayPort monitor into it.
Basically, it's just killed off USB 3, Firewire, eSATA, DisplayPort, HDMI, DVI, and 10Gbps Ethernet as far as the desktop goes.
And all I can say to that is it's about time.
There's one big limitation (apart from the fact that the only device supporting it right now is the new Macbook Pro): The maximum cable length for the copper version is just 3 metres - 10 feet. To run longer distances, you'll need an optical cable; I don't know if that runs off the same port (by building the optical components into the cable itself) or not.
All in all it looks like a very nice - and very welcome - piece of engineering.
Update: Apparently, yes, the optical transceivers will be built in to the cable, so the standard port remains standard and you simply use copper cables for short runs and fibre for longer runs.
Sadly, they released the sexy little 11-inch MacBook Air without this, so now I'll have to wait for the next rev of that hardware.
Posted by: J Greely at Friday, February 25 2011 06:40 AM (fpXGN)
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Friday, February 25 2011 09:04 AM (9KseV)
It depends on where things go with drivers though.
And it is and isn't DisplayPort. It's not just a matter of speed, but of protocols and capabilities. DisplayPort could in theory be used for anything, but its back-channel capacity was way under-specified, so much so that it was almost unidirectional, and there was no standard for anything other than video.
So this is more like... More like... Um. Something else.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, February 25 2011 10:05 AM (PiXy!)
Posted by: Kayle at Friday, February 25 2011 07:12 PM (gpi2V)
56 queries taking 0.1444 seconds, 335 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.