Tuesday, August 30


Location, Location, Location

Okay, I've lined up reasonably-priced providers in the following locations:
  • Phoenix (2)
  • Dallas (2)
  • Atlanta
  • New Jersey
  • Chicago
  • Los Angeles
  • Fremont
I'm not sure about the company operating the Chicago and Fremont hosting - they seem to have happy customers, but they're small and operate out of Malaysia.  Mind you, I'm even smaller and operate out of my living room...

One of the providers in Phoenix - I/O Flood - is also a tiny company, but they clearly know what they are doing (very active online) and their pricing is great.  The other two providers have been in business for years and I've had servers with both of them previously, but they're the most expensive.  (But still significantly cheaper than what I'm paying now.)

Fremont, Dallas, and New Jersey would make sense from a geographical perspective, but I really like the guys in Phoenix.  Maybe Phoenix and Atlanta.

Ah, decisions, decisions. wink

Posted by: Pixy Misa at 10:08 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 155 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Phoenix will be the best option as a best VPS hosting because I am using it. It provides high quality services at low price.

Posted by: Adam Smith at Tuesday, December 27 2011 07:22 PM (Lkty4)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
45kb generated in CPU 0.048, elapsed 0.1361 seconds.
56 queries taking 0.1047 seconds, 340 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.