Sunday, May 14
Apparently there's some "Are YOU A Liberal" test roaming around the blogosphere. Picked it up at Insty's:
1) Repeal the estate tax repeal: No. All it does is force people to restructure their finances. Estate taxes are transaction fees, not taxes as such, and excessive transaction fees simply lead to shifts in transactions. The proposal to charge substantial fees for wire transfers to Mexico is idiotic for precisely the same reason.
2) Increase the minimum wage and index it to the CPI: No. Ask for a raise if you think you've earned it.
3) Universal health care: Define it. Australia has universal health care, more or less, and it hasn't run our economy into the ground yet. But if your life isn't at risk right this minute, you could be waiting quite a while for that operation.
4) Increase CAFE standards: Stamp out Starbucks! I have no idea what this is.
5) Pro-reproductive rights, getting rid of abstinence-only education, improving education about and access to contraception including the morning after pill, and supporting choice: Mostly, yes. Not that I think abortion is a good thing, but education is.
6) Simplify and increase the progressivity of the tax code: Simplifying the tax code is going to make it less "progressive". Which would be a good thing, in my opinion. Wipe out income tax entirely and replace it with a flat value-added tax. No exemptions. Carrots are cheap enough as it is.
7) Kill faith-based funding: Drag it out behind the barn and kill it with an axe, just like P. J. O'Rourke did the Omnibus Farm Bill. Apply funding based on effectiveness alone. If the Salvation Army gets the job done, I don't have a problem with them getting some of my tax money. They already get some of my non-tax money anyway.
Reduce corporate giveaways: Yep. Simply reduce corporate taxes across the board and they won't be necessary any more. All they do is distort the market.
9) Have Medicare run the Medicare drug plan: Axe.
10) Force companies to stop underfunding their pensions. Change corporate bankruptcy law to put workers and retirees at the head of the line with respect to their pensions: I'll defer to Insty on this, who says the question is based on a false premise.
11) Leave the states alone on issues like medical marijuana: Yes. And again, Glenn notes that where we need strong legislation is on antibiotics, not recreational pharmaceuticals.
12) Paper ballots: We have those, and redistribution of preferences, and we get our election results back within hours. Except when strange things happen and the Fishing Party of Queensland ends up deciding the balance of power of the Federal Senate.
13) Improve access to daycare and other pro-family policies: Mmmno. On the whole, I'm inclined to say cut taxes, and let families pay for it. Dear government, butt out!!!
14) Raise the cap on wages covered by FICA taxes: No, whatever that is. Abolish it instead.
15) Marriage rights for all, which includes "gay marriage" and quicker transition to citizenship for the foreign spouses of citizens: No. Just nullify all laws involving marriage. You want to marry your pot plant? Whatever. You've married a decendent of George Washington? Don't care.
16) Undo the bankruptcy bill enacted by this administration: I seem to recall thinking that it was a bad idea, but not the details, so pass.
The questions seem to be of two varieties: The most prevalent is Do you live in economic fairyland, where the magic power of the State to print money removes all personal responsibility?, and the second is Do you like drugs? Drugs are great; I don't think my life has ever depended on them, but my quality of life is quite reliant on dexchlorpheniramine and the occasional dose of ibuprofen. But if you answered positively to question one, you may be a little too devoted to question two. I'm just sayiing...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:09 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 675 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Monday, May 15 2006 12:21 AM (+rSRq)
I presume even if private Social Security accounts get created, the agency itself will retain it's position as a government agency; making it into a private insurance company would have so much moral hazard it's not even funny.
And I agree with a number of the bloggers that answered the questions, that many of them are too vague to be meaningful. I think both conservatives and liberals want to "end corporate welfare", but that's like being in favor of Mom and Apple Pie. It's the details that start arguments.
Posted by: Nathan H. at Monday, May 15 2006 09:18 PM (/N9MX)
Posted by: TallDave at Monday, May 15 2006 10:34 PM (H8Wgl)
Posted by: TallDave at Monday, May 15 2006 10:35 PM (H8Wgl)
Posted by: Dean Esmay at Tuesday, May 16 2006 04:13 AM (S1ka/)
56 queries taking 0.151 seconds, 355 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.