Wednesday, August 26

Geek

Daily News Stuff 26 August 2026

CNO Orrery Edition

Top Story

  • Apple has announced new Mac Mini models based on the M5 Pro and M6 CPUs.  (MacRumors)

    The M6 is a marked upgrade over the M4 - the M5 never showed up on the Mac Mini - but there is no M6 Pro, so the higher-end models of the Mac Mini, anything with more than 32GB of RAM, steps back to the M5 Pro.

    But if you don't need that the M6 should run a lot faster.  Apple says up to 40%, and that's actually believable, because it not only increases the core count from 10 to 12, it adds two high-end "super" cores, not just two low-end efficiency cores.

    Oh, and 2.5 Gbit Ethernet is standard, not the ancient 1 Gbit.

    Not cheap - the 64GB model costs five times as much as I paid for a 64GB mini-PC last December, but the same mini-PC at the same price now only has 32GB, so it has gotten closer.
     

  • If you need more than that, Apple also announced M5 Max and M5 Ultra Mac Studios with up to 512G of RAM.  (Mac Rumors)

    That's a big jump as well, because the high-end Studio model was limited to the old M3 Ultra, and even then maxed out at...  I think 96GB of RAM, with anything faster sold out.  Now you can get those high-end models again, and they come with 1.2TB of bandwidth, suitable for pretty serious tasks.

    Yes, they're wildly expensive, but right now so is everything, so Apple looks, if not more affordable, less unaffordable.


Tech News


Musical Interlude





Disclaimer: Long skirt, short jacket.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at 06:39 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 510 words, total size 5 kb.

1 Apple's promising that you can cluster 4 of the new Mac Studios to share their memory and run with The Big Boys.

-j

Posted by: J Greely at Thursday, August 27 2026 12:20 AM (oJgNG)

2 I assume they mean cluster via Thunderbolt, since with three ports you get a high-speed fully-connected four-node network.  If they've set up the drivers well that could be interesting; it's PCIe after all.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, August 27 2026 05:56 AM (PiXy!)

3 Yep, they're talking about RDMA over Thunderbolt (and Thunderbolt 5 specifically on the M5 Pro models).  That will work decently for MoE models, and be terrible on dense models.  And work pretty well on cluster tasks generally.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, August 27 2026 08:00 AM (PiXy!)

4 Still missing a bunch of images from my blog. Something like the last 9 uploaded. I don't know if trying to upload over the compromised entries will screw things up worse.

Posted by: Mauser at Thursday, August 27 2026 03:01 PM (XWgGM)

5 Ah, sorry, I got eaten by wolves.  I'll check on that, but certainly uploading fresh copies shouldn't make things worse.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, August 27 2026 06:23 PM (PiXy!)

6 That's some interesting spam in the comment before this one (for readers from the future, it will probably be gone, and I'm not referring to Pixy's wolves.)

Posted by: Rick C at Friday, August 28 2026 10:50 PM (1zWbY)

7 Yeah.  AI spam advertising AI services, which are probably worthless.  At least it's figured out the secret word.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, August 28 2026 11:16 PM (PiXy!)

8 I wouldn't be surprised if this was a person, TBH. The two comments were both more-or-less relevant, with the only hint to it being spam a link in the name. It's like ESR said years ago, he sort of expected spam to eventually evolve into something more or less harmless. If you didn't mouse over the name you wouldn't know it was spam. Of course, and maybe I shouldn't point this out, the fail was commenting on a 4 year old post (and then compounding that by explicitly saying he'd done so, which is why I looked at it to see what it was.)

Posted by: Rick C at Saturday, August 29 2026 04:35 AM (1zWbY)

9 Rick C - I guess you could consider that "more or less harmless", but I lean towards "more" because it's SEO poisoning. Which does two things: one, makes their site selling whatever it is (questionable pharmaceuticals or questionable online gambling sites or whatever) tend to show up higher in the search engine rankings because an otherwise-respectable blog has "linked" to it... and two, when the search engine's automated spam-site-detection systems find those links, they would then tend to reduce their internal reliability score for Pixy's blog and therefore rate all links from Pixy's blog lower in quality, even the legitimate ones.

So it has an effect quite similar to when a government prints money by the trainload, thereby deflating everyone's legitimate money. Which is quite harmful, and I find these hide-the-link-in-the-name spam comments also quite harmful. The harm is more hidden, but it's just as real.

Posted by: Robin Munn at Saturday, August 29 2026 12:18 PM (29wva)

10 Let's say I would consider it less immediately obviously obnoxious, compared to typical spam.  I don't disagree with what you said.

Posted by: Rick C at Sunday, August 30 2026 04:56 AM (1zWbY)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




Apple pies are delicious. But never mind apple pies. What colour is a green orange?




57kb generated in CPU 0.1488, elapsed 0.5813 seconds.
58 queries taking 0.5666 seconds, 378 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.