I'm in the future. Like hundreds of years in the future. I've been dead for centuries.
Oh, lovely, you're a cheery one aren't you?
Friday, November 11
Reckon He'll Do
Peter Costello, Treasurer of Australia and likely our next Prime Minister:
If you are somebody who wants to live in an Islamic state governed by sharia law you are not going to be happy in Australia, because Australia is not an Islamic state, will never be an Islamic state and will never be governed by sharia law.
We are a secular state under our constitution, our law is made by parliament elected in democratic elections.
We do not derive our laws from religious instruction.
There are Islamic states around the world that practise sharia law and if that’s your object you may well be much more at home in such a country than trying to turn Australia into one of those countries, because it’s not going to happen.
I wasn't sure he would measure up to John Howard's example, but I think I'm starting to come round.
(via Tim Blair)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
07:00 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 154 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Can we have him as President of the US?
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at Friday, November 11 2005 11:35 AM (0yYS2)
2
You may just get him. The poor man has been the next in line for quite awhile.
Posted by: Andrew at Friday, November 11 2005 07:26 PM (RWEVY)
3
Mind you, John Howard had to wait even longer.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, November 11 2005 10:25 PM (AIaDY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thursday, November 10
If At First You Don't Succeed
Change the rules.
The Kansas Board of "Education" has adopted the anti-evolutionary "science standards" they have been pushing for some time. The standards are not even complete, but the six-member dingbat wing of the board pushed them through over the objections of the four-member sane wing.
In addition, the board rewrote the definition of science, so that it is no longer limited to the search for natural explanations of phenomena.
This will come as a surprise to every scientist and science teacher on the planet. Science
is the search for natural explanations of phenomena. That's the most fundamental definition of science; science explains natural events in terms of natural causes - i.e. other natural events.
That the Kansas Board of "Education" (or at least the dingbat wing thereof) would redefine science in this way can mean only one of two things: Either they are ignorant - and, since the facts of the matter have most certainly been presented to them, ineducable; or they are willingly participating in an act of fraud against the state's schoolchildren. I'm not sure Hanlon's Razor is sufficiently sharp for this one.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:45 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 196 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I predict Kansans will evolve to higher intelligence and throw the school board out, thus dealing a double blow to ID.
Posted by: TallDave at Thursday, November 10 2005 04:58 PM (giBEj)
2
It's going to the supremes. let them worry about it, thass what they're paid for.
Pixy, i'm reading this coolio new book--Quantum Evolution. between that and the approaching singularity, the IDists are going to have the top of their heads taken clean off. ;-)
Posted by: matoko-chan at Thursday, November 10 2005 10:56 PM (cxYaY)
3
Well, good news from Pennsylvania: All of the Dover school board members who were standing for re-election - which is 8 of the 9 - have been thrown out.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, November 10 2005 11:15 PM (AIaDY)
4
Including ALL of the idiot-wingers. Give it a few days and that stupid thing will be gone and buried.
Posted by: Wonderduck at Friday, November 11 2005 12:45 AM (KnWO3)
5
While I won't defend the Kansas Board of Education, that definition of science isn't right either. It should be: science is the search for
useful explanations of
natural phenomena. A theory that the motions of bodies are caused by the influence of angels would certainly not be a natural explanation -- but if somebody, in accordance with that theory, levitated himself by invoking the relevant angel's name, the scientific community could not just dismiss the theory on the ground that it appealed to supernatural causes. The reason why scientists are disinclined to consider the supernatural as an explanation for phenomena is, that appeals to the supernatural are seldom followed by otherwise inexplicable phenomena; not, as you seem to think, because science must exclude the supernatural a priori. If prayer were effective more often, scientists would have to study prayer.
Posted by: Michael Brazier at Saturday, November 12 2005 01:36 AM (8LTnv)
6
Michael - Sorry, but no.
Science is only possible within the framework of metaphysical naturalism. If people could levitate themselves by evoking the name of an angel then we would be well-advised to study that. But it would not be science.
Science requires that all natural (i.e. observable, measurable) events can be explained entirely in terms of natural (observable, measurable) causes. That whenever we can see something happen, it is caused by something we can also see (or otherwise detect and measure).
Science does indeeed exclude the supernatural
a priori; this is absolutely fundamental and yours is a dismayingly common misapprehension among non-scientists. Science does, as I note, have a very specific definition of "natural", and "supernatural" in terms of the philosophy of science is simply the obverse of that, and, according to science, an empty set.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Saturday, November 12 2005 04:05 AM (AIaDY)
7
1) By your definition of "science", no one who believes Christian doctrine can be a scientist;
2) Sir Isaac Newton believed Christian doctrine;
3) Therefore: you deny that Newton was a scientist.
If people could levitate themselves by evoking the name of an angel then we would be well-advised to study that. But it would not be science.
If people could levitate themselves by invoking the name of an angel, there could not be science as you define it, because metaphysical naturalism would be demonstrably false. But there would certainly be attempts to explain natural phenomena, which is science as
I define it.
I wonder if you realize that, on the point I chose to argue, you agree with the Kansas Board of Education, and I don't? The "nutbars" in Kansas are as convinced as you are that every scientist must cleave to metaphysical naturalism. Where they differ from you is, they think metaphysical naturalism is false -- and they are no more prepared to let falsehood pass unchallenged in the schools than you are.
Posted by: Michael Brazier at Saturday, November 12 2005 06:52 PM (8LTnv)
8
1) By your definition of "science"
It is not
my definition of Science. It is
the defintion of Science. There is only one Science, and it is as I have defined it here.
no one who believes Christian doctrine can be a scientist;
False.
You can believe in Christian doctrine and still be a scientist, even a great scientist. You just have to keep the Christian doctrine out of your scientific research.
That requires maintaining two different and contradictory metaphysical frameworks, but people are good at that.
And this is a problem specifically with religious
doctrine. Deism has no conflict with Science.
2) Sir Isaac Newton believed Christian doctrine;
And many other strange things, yes.
3) Therefore: you deny that Newton was a scientist.
No. Since your point 1 is entirely false, the syllogism fails.
If people could levitate themselves by invoking the name of an angel, there could not be science as you define it, because metaphysical naturalism would be demonstrably false. But there would certainly be attempts to explain natural phenomena, which is science as I define it.
Nobody cares how you define science, because you are wrong. Science as you define it has no value - see
my post above for a detailed explanation of why.
The "nutbars" in Kansas are as convinced as you are that every scientist must cleave to metaphysical naturalism.
Baloney.
They are trying to push Intelligent Design, which relies on supernatural forces, into the science classroom.
ID is not science. They Kansas Board of Education doesn't give a damn about the nature of Science; they just want to push their ideas on students no matter what the facts say.
Where they differ from you is, they think metaphysical naturalism is false
The evidence they present for this belief - the ID concept of irreducible complexity - has been comprehensively refuted, so I don't really care what they think.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Saturday, November 12 2005 08:32 PM (QriEg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wednesday, November 09
Tuesday, November 08
Law Review
Pixy's Law of Editing
In any document preparation system, the ease of spotting errors is directly proportional to the difficulty of correcting them.
Thus if you are preparing a highschool newspaper using electric typewriters and actual cut-and-paste, you will notice immediately that you have used "affect" when you meant "effect", but will let it slide because it's too much effort to fix.
On the other hand, if you are using a million-dollar WYSIWYG prepress and workflow system, you will not notice that you have inserted the last three chapters of Lady Chatterley's Lover - upside down - into Introductory Linear Algebra until after 50,000 copies have been bound and shipped.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:29 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 114 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Though really this is just the point where the Law of Unintended Consequences intersects with the Law of Maximum Inconvenience.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, November 08 2005 09:53 AM (QriEg)
2
Welllll, it could have been worse - you could have inserted the last 3 chapters of Lady Chatterly into the Algebra text?! I tend to be optimistic. And who made the 'rule' that you have to hold the book the exact same way all the way through?
Posted by: nita at Tuesday, November 08 2005 10:51 AM (gm7Og)
3
So, ummmm, what are the
odds of that?
; )
Posted by: Chrissy at Tuesday, November 08 2005 06:24 PM (zJsUT)
4
Never worked in a bookstore, have you? :-)
It happens here at the Duck U. Bookstore at least once a semester... no, not Lady Chatterley, but upside-down chapters, missing chapters, WRONG chapters...
My favorite one was when I was working at a normal retail bookstore: 30 copies, pages 100-122 blank (except for the page number) and bound in upside-down.
Posted by: Wonderduck at Tuesday, November 08 2005 06:44 PM (+rGmJ)
5
So Pixi I'm afraid I may have used a pronoun of the incorrect gender when refering to you Friday. Sorry about that if I did. Stuff is screaming right along by the way good work.
Posted by: Howie at Friday, November 18 2005 10:50 AM (D3+20)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Tenshi na Konamaiki
Megumi is the most beautiful girl anyone has ever seen. She's also an abrasive tomboy who will fight just about anyone for just about any reason. She wasn't always like this; in fact, she wasn't always a she...
On the one hand it's long (50 episodes), somewhat cliched (a boy cursed to grow up as a girl), a bit silly, and relies too heavily at times on Megumi Hayashibara's talents. And Megumi (the one in the story, not Hayashibara-san) is somewhat funny-looking.
On the other hand, the characters definitely grow on you (even Keiko, who starts out as a stock miss-rich-bitch), most of the episodes are enjoyable in themselves, it has some interesting twists and turns, and it all resolves itself in a very satisfying way. Even when you see what's coming (and there's some nice foreshadowing if you know what to look for) what you get isn't quite what you expected.
It hasn't been licensed yet, so right now your only option (assuming you don't speak Japanese) is to download the fansub. Which is, I'll add, very nicely done.
Other reviews: JASCII, AnimeNfo. Some of the reviewers don't like it at all, by the way, often for exactly the reasons I do. I you can get past the unusually un-cute character designs at the start, though, there's a lot there to enjoy.
One thing I'll add: Megumi Hayashibara was in her mid-thirties when she did this part, and at first it was weird to hear her voice coming from a fifteen year old girl. But within a couple of episodes it seemed the most natural thing in the world, and Megu-san is very very good at bringing her roles to life. Be warned, it is her Lina Inverse voice, and if that's going to have you expecting Dragon Slave at least once per episode you'll be disappointed.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
07:49 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 314 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Just remember to hang around after the credits on
Tenshi na Konamaiki. They have an irritating habit of putting thirty seconds to two minutes of anything from one-off gags to full-on plot elements after the credits are done rolling.
Love that show. Wonder if anybody is ever going to bother licensing it in the States? The manga seems to have bombed, which suggests "not likely".
Posted by: Mitch H. at Tuesday, November 08 2005 11:58 AM (iTVQj)
2
They have an irritating habit of putting thirty seconds to two minutes of anything from one-off gags to full-on plot elements after the credits are done rolling.
You tell me this after I have watched the entire series?
Blup.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, November 08 2005 06:06 PM (QriEg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thursday, November 03
For A Few Pixels More
I have them and you don't! Nya nya nya!
more...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
07:59 AM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 19 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Click for biggie size. I scanned them at higher resolution (1200 dpi), but they don't look that great above this size because of the limits of the printing process used. Even on a 17" monitor these are are magnified 2x.
I tried to order the Laserdiscs when I got these (2002), but they'd run out. Anyway, I don't have a scanner big enough.
I'll scan the back covers and post those tonight.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, November 03 2005 11:42 PM (AIaDY)
2
You are just an evil, evil person.
I take some solace in the fact that they aren't subtitled and you don't know japanese, but you're still evil and cruel.
God I envy you.
Posted by: Wonderduck at Friday, November 04 2005 01:12 AM (KnWO3)
3
I have subtitle files for them. :)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, November 04 2005 01:32 AM (AIaDY)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, November 04 2005 01:37 AM (AIaDY)
Posted by: Wonderduck at Friday, November 04 2005 11:46 AM (+rGmJ)
6
Die, die, die!
And double that for the jackasses that came up with region encoding... :-(
Posted by: Ubu Roi at Friday, November 04 2005 04:23 PM (dhRpo)
7
Ubu, did you know that you can change the region coding on a DVD-ROM or DVD-R/W? (in WinXP anyway, not sure about other versions)
You can only do it a four or five times, but that's why I have two DVD drives ^_^.
Posted by: JP Gibb at Friday, November 04 2005 07:56 PM (e7eKn)
8
Both my standalone DVD players are region free. That's standard in Australia.
My
notebook is region-locked. You know, a portable computer that you take with you on business trips that comes with a DVD-ROM drive and DVD player software.
Wankers.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, November 04 2005 11:18 PM (AIaDY)
9
"did you know that you can change the region coding on a DVD-ROM or DVD-R/W? (in WinXP anyway, not sure about other versions)"
It seems that Apples do the same thing, from what I've read. No big surprise there, they use most of the same hardware, close enough.
I'd kill for an unlocked home DVD player. Oh well.
Posted by: Wonderduck at Friday, November 04 2005 11:35 PM (KnWO3)
10
Wonderduck, you could also get your player modified. Depending on exactly how cheap life is where you are, that might well be the cheaper alternative.
Posted by: HC at Saturday, November 05 2005 03:02 AM (d3NQv)
11
There are also region zero DVD players on eBay.
Caveat emptor, though.
Posted by: JP Gibb at Saturday, November 05 2005 07:36 PM (e7eKn)
12
"Depending on exactly how cheap life is where you are, that might well be the cheaper alternative."
Well, if we're talking about MY life, it's very expensive. I'm somewhat less concerned about random strangers' life. :-)
Posted by: Wonderduck at Saturday, November 05 2005 10:18 PM (mAAjO)
13
I've got a utility I downloaded called "
SmartRipper". It's got an option which says it will "unlock" the DVD drive. There isn't any documentation which explains what, precisely, that means but I think it means that it de-regions the drive, sets it to region 0.
I haven't taken the risk to try it to see what it would do; there's no telling, and I don't really want to trash a drive just to find out that it doesn't work. (And anyway I haven't really been tempted to purchase any non-Region-1 DVDs.)
Right now my primary DVD drive for my PC is an external USB 2 drive from Iomega. I think that if I was going to start buying Japanese disks, I'd probably get another one and change it to the appropriate region.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Sunday, November 06 2005 12:21 AM (CJBEv)
14
I have US, Japanese and Australian DVDs,
three different regions. I don't think I have any European ones, fortunately.
I've seen stores here offering free - and region-free - DVD players if you buy four DVDs. Wonderduck, maybe I can find a cheap one that will run off 110V and send it to you. :)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, November 06 2005 02:33 AM (QriEg)
15
"I've seen stores here offering free - and region-free - DVD players if you buy four DVDs. Wonderduck, maybe I can find a cheap one that will run off 110V and send it to you. :)"
Woo! I'll take you up on that one, Pixy... particularly if you wanna throw in burns of the DP discs, too!
Hey, in for a penny...
Posted by: Wonderduck at Sunday, November 06 2005 12:00 PM (+rGmJ)
16
By the way, I take back what I said about you being evil and cruel. You ARE, but I'm taking it back anyway.
Posted by: Wonderduck at Sunday, November 06 2005 12:01 PM (+rGmJ)
17
Subtitles and R2 dvds-now the fun is putting them together! What I'm doing is ripping the dvds with DVD Decrypter (which removes DCSS, macrovision, & region encoding) and gives me bit for bit copies of the originial dvds and using a subtitle program to add and sync the subs to the video and audio, then taking the resulting files and burning them to a DVD+R DL blank-presto-originial Dirty Pair the way it was meant to be.
Posted by: zrdb at Tuesday, April 04 2006 10:37 PM (ieOxu)
18
My Dirty Pair dvds came in standard cd jewell boxes, they have a fold out cover insert in the front of the case.
Posted by: zrdb at Saturday, May 06 2006 07:29 PM (ieOxu)
19
Yep, that's what I have.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Saturday, May 06 2006 08:30 PM (Yen+c)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A Fistful Of Pixels
The Good: My laserdisc player, which I haven't used for, oh, a real long time, still works perfectly.
The Bad: My new video capture widget doesn't work at all well with NTSC. In fact, it craps it up completely. Of course, all my laserdiscs are NTSC. (I checked the specs and it said it supported NTSC. I didn't notice there were two different models.)
The Ugly: We've been really spoilt by the recent trend towards end-to-end digital transfers. Laserdiscs used to be considered high-quality video. Eh. Well, I guess my choice of test disc had something to do with it. (Slayers Next, which just happened to be handy.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
07:53 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 116 words, total size 1 kb.
Speaking Of Which
Back in the day, 80GB of disk would look like a warehouse full of washing machines.
The good thing was that this made it much harder to put it down somewhere and lose it.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
12:57 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Did you look under the garage-sized floppy drive?
Posted by: Wonderduck at Thursday, November 03 2005 01:14 AM (HoSBk)
2
You lost 80 GB of anime? Now if I had 80 GB of anime to lose (and, frightening thought, I must - on dvd at least) I'd place it in a shrine. With candles, and bowl for lighting incense.
Not under the pile of papers on the desk, or double-shelved in that corner, or under the couch cushions - or wherever it has disappeared to.
Posted by: HC at Thursday, November 03 2005 03:21 AM (d3NQv)
3
No, I lost the legal department's off-site backup drive.
Much less important.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, November 03 2005 04:09 AM (AIaDY)
4
My anime is much harder to lose, seeing as it's an 8-disk RAID array.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, November 03 2005 04:10 AM (AIaDY)
5
Just as long as the RAID array isn't made out of drives from Western Digital which have that bug.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Thursday, November 03 2005 03:30 PM (CJBEv)
6
Good to see you have your priorities straight...
Posted by: Anonymous Coward at Thursday, November 03 2005 03:31 PM (sCYzS)
7
Physically, the largest drive in my collection is a 5 megabyte aftermarket drive for the TRS80, with the files from an old BBS still on it. It's a 5-1/4 full height, but the case is sized like an 8 inch drive so people will take it seriously.
I had a pair of 20 meg end tables, but left them behind when we moved.
Posted by: triticale at Sunday, November 06 2005 09:14 PM (ngaKT)
8
Triticale, what are you using to get onto the internet, an abacus?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Monday, November 07 2005 02:29 PM (CJBEv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wednesday, November 02
Terror Bites
I have a terabyte of fansubbed anime.
Okay, so a lot of it is crap. Still...
Time, I think, to get my other terabyte of disk working again.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:50 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
Oogleblick
The web is a big place, and full of unexpected treasures.
One such is the Meganeko Gallery.
For the unsubtle, there's also Being Upfront.
As quite a few lucky fellows can attest, the two are not disjoint sets.
(Click on the links if you don't know what the hell I'm talking about.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:37 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Wonderful webpages... have been to them both many times for research purposes.
WHAT???
Posted by: Wonderduck at Wednesday, November 02 2005 10:37 AM (mAAjO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
81kb generated in CPU 0.0318, elapsed 0.1984 seconds.
57 queries taking 0.1823 seconds, 411 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.