1
Is there some sort of DNS problem right now? For the last couple of days, about half the time when I try to load a mee.nu or mu.nu site I get a DNS lookup fail.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Tuesday, January 20 2015 03:21 AM (+rSRq)
2
I'll take a look. I haven't had any problems myself.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, January 20 2015 04:35 AM (2yngH)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Tuesday, January 20 2015 05:18 AM (+rSRq)
4
Yeah, I ran a recursive DNS scan and it didn't find any errors. Which is actually kind of unusual; there's almost always something somewhere that glitches and needs a retry when you do a full scan.
Might have been a network hiccup somewhere. There's a lot of DDoS activity going on right now, though fortunately we haven't been targeted this time.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, January 20 2015 02:18 PM (PiXy!)
"If we find evidence of a terrorist plot… and despite having a phone number, despite having a social media address or email address, we can’t penetrate that, that’s a problem,†Obama said. He said he believes Silicon Valley companies also want to solve the problem. "They’re patriots.â€
Reactions to the appalling murder of the staff at Charlie Hebdo have been, shall we say, mixed. The culprits have been chased down and shot, which is only as it should be. Millions of people and dozens of world leaders have turned out in support. The first issue published since the attack sold out immediately - and the print run has been scaled up from sixty thousand to five million to meet demand.
Meanwhile, major media outlets reporting on the events have taken great care to censor the images of the cartoons at the centre of all this, which makes one think that they have forgotten what journalism is. Pope Francis has said "One cannot make fun of faith." Which is odd, because it's actually pretty easy. And the usual assemblage of useful idiots has come crawling out of the woodwork to say "Of course I support freedom of speech, but -" To paraphrase Robert Heinlein's character Lazarus Long:
The correct way to punctuate a sentence that starts: "Of course I support freedom of speech, but -" is to place a period after the word "but." Don't use excessive force in supplying such a moron with a period. Cutting his throat is only a momentary pleasure and is bound to get you talked about.
But - sorry.
In all this the most shameful response so far - and I hope the most shameful response ever - has been that of British Prime Minister David Cameron.
And let me now address very directly this issue of how we have the right legal framework to intercept the communications of potential terrorists. There are two issues here. One is what is called communications data. That is not the content of a phone call; it is just who made which call to which person, and when. As everybody knows, this vital communications data is absolutely crucial, not just in terrorism, but in finding missing people; it's vital in murder investigations; it's used in almost every single serious crime investigation.
And what matters, in simple terms, is that we can access this communications data whether people are using a fixed phone, a mobile phone, or more modern ways of communicating via the internet. We have already legislated in this parliament to safeguard this vital data, because it was under threat from a particular European directive. But it is important in the future that we make sure we can get this data when people are using the more modern forms of communication that are being made possible through the internet. So that is one piece of additional legislation that will be necessary.
The second thing, which is more contentious, is about accessing the content of a telephone call, or another form of communication. And here again the same problem exists. Will we be able to access the content as the internet and new ways of communicating develop?
Now I have a very simple principle to apply here, which should be at the heart of the legislation that will be necessary. The simple principle is this:
In our country, do we want to allow a means of communication between people, which, even in extremis, with a signed warrant from the Home Secretary personally, that we cannot read?
Now, up until now, governments of this country have said no; we must not have such a means of communication.
That is why, in extremis, it's been possible to read someone's letter. That is why, in extremis, it's been possible to listen in to someone's telephone call. That is why the same applies with mobile communications.
Now, let me stress again, this cannot happen unless the Home Secretary personally signs a warrant. We have a better system for safeguarding this very this very intrusive power than probably any other country I can think of.
But the question remains, are we going to allow a means of communication where it simply isn't possible to do that?
And my answer to that question is no we must not.
(I couldn't find a transcript of this speech online, so I transcribed it myself. I apologise for any errors I may have introduced.)
Now there are a number of things I need to say about this. In order:
Mr Cameron, you have no right to dictate the means of communication available to the British public.
My outrage at your position is only slight tempered by the fact that you have no power to dictate the means of communication available to the British public. Encryption is mathematics, and you cannot legislate mathematics.
You seem to believe that all you need to do is contact a small number of major companies and insist that they install back doors in their software for your spies, and that will be the end of it. If that is indeed your belief, then, Mr Cameron, you have been quite remarkably poorly advised, and should fire everyone, immediately.
First, back doors in communications systems are security breaches. Security breaches get exploited. That's simply what happens. Those major companies are not going to talk to you.
Second, any competent programmer can deploy an unbreakably secure communications system in a day. Making it user-friendly, making it attractive, making it scale, making the idiot users select sane passwords, those are the hard problems. Encryption we've solved.
To actually implement your proposed legislation would mean prohibiting computers from the United Kingdom entirely. Not even North Korea has gone that far.
The first duty of any government is to keep our country and our people safe.
No, Mr Cameron. The first duty of any government is to not become a threat to the very people it serves. All else comes after that.
If you read the United States' Bill of Rights, you will notice that it does not specify what the government can do. It specifies what the government cannot do. It says, Congress shall make no law...
George Orwell wrote us a powerful warning in 1984. Mr Cameron, what he was warning us about was you. Orwell didn't warn us against attackers from outside, but against our own principles leading us into disaster. The death of the soul of a nation comes not from invasion, but from a thousand cuts to the freedom of its people.
Even the NSA, in its blatant breaches of fundamental human rights and the US Constitution, had the grace to be embarrassed, and to carry out its acts in secret.
That you could even present your position in public tells the world that something is very, very rotten in the state of Britain.
Mr Cameron, you are not just taking the first steps down the road to fascism; you are standing on fascism's doorstep, leaning on the bell, peering in the window to see if anyone is home.
There is still time to step back. But the sand is running out of the hourglass very quickly.
George Orwell wrote us a powerful warning in 1984.
Wait....so you're saying that
the ending of that book was not supposed to be interpreted as a happy one?
I'm glad to see that there is another that agrees with me on this point of literary criticism, but I'm not sure that the opinion is shared by many of our leaders or the Parson's wanaabe's who serve them.
...you cannot legislate mathematics.
Well...they can certainly muck things up in the attempt.....
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Friday, January 16 2015 07:33 AM (DnAJl)
Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution is a list of things the government is permitted to do, and Amendment X says that the list is comprehensive and complete.
Unfortunately, no one important pays much attention to that any more, and the US government does all kinds of things these days that don't really fall under anything in that list except for the astoundingly flexible "interstate commerce" clause.
Still, it was a nice idea while it lasted.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Friday, January 16 2015 12:30 PM (+rSRq)
3
hello!,I love your writing so much! share we keep up a correspondence extra about your post on AOL?
I need a specialist on this area to solve my problem.
Maybe that's you! Taking a look forward to see you.
Posted by: Tomoiu Gabriela at Sunday, April 26 2015 05:36 AM (x3KxO)
4
I'm pretty pleased to discover this great site.
I want to to thank you for your time due to this
wonderful read!! I definitely enjoyed every little bit of it and i also have
you bookmarked to check out new things on your website.
Posted by: Lane at Tuesday, April 28 2015 10:43 PM (YpsZ/)
5
What's up it's me, I am also visiting this website regularly, this website is truly good and the
visitors are genuinely sharing pleasant thoughts.
6
If you feel that it's too difficult to adhere to
your diet for any considerable time, It may be in your best interest to consider a different diet.
All of these chemical substances begin to function automatically to make sure you burn up massive amounts of unwanted weight.
A terrific technique to reduce weight will include slowly reducing
the number of calories people consume daily.
7
My family always say that I am wasting my time here at web, except I know
I am getting knowledge daily by reading thes pleasant content.
Posted by: site at Monday, May 18 2015 02:57 AM (gObTa)
8
Families will be able to unearth the truth with regards to what exactly kids happen to
be expressing on their mobile phones. Spy - Bubble is definitely an fantastic
cell phone spying software program for monitoring cell phone
usage and activity. * Performance and production in document management are highly important: immediate
access, quick search syndication to viewers, sensible document sorting, document scanning,
etc.
Posted by: espionner sms at Wednesday, May 20 2015 10:48 AM (oJdt2)
9
This article is really a pleasant one it helps new web people, who are wishing for blogging.
10
Aw, this was an incredibly nice post. Taking the
time and actual effort to create a top notch article…
but what can I say… I hesitate a whole lot and never seem to get anything done.
11
You need to be a part of a contest for one of the best blogs on the web.
I am going to recommend this website!
Posted by: Marylou at Thursday, June 11 2015 08:57 PM (jttMG)
12
Hi there every one, here every person is sharing these kinds of knowledge, thus it's pleasant to read this website,
and I used to pay a visit this website all the time.
Posted by: Manuela at Friday, June 12 2015 01:18 AM (PUzIt)
Nowhere in Farago's pro-censorship argument does he address, or even fleetingly consider, the possibility that the ideas that the state will forcibly suppress will be ideas that he likes, rather than ideas that he dislikes. People who want the state to punish the expression of certain ideas are so convinced of their core goodness, the unchallengeable rightness of their views, that they cannot even conceive that the ideas they like will, at some point, end up on the Prohibited List.
Glenn Greenwald, of all people, writing in The Guardian, of all places. Even a blind pig finds a self-evident truth now and then.
This new human rights law will set up state surveillance of intolerant citizens, including those who voice anti-feminist views and those who voice overt approval of a totalitarian ideology. Intolerant citizens will not only be arrested, but will also be sent to special re-education facilities designed to instill values of tolerance, and the law will also require all media outlets to promote a climate of tolerance. The law carefully takes freedom of expression into account.
The only question is whether this is intended as satire.
Nobody has the right to take away rights from others. Nobody has the freedom to take away freedoms from others.
Anyone guilty of hate speech – which should carry criminal penalties of 25 years to life – should be sent to special prisons designed to re-educate them and to instill values of tolerance, freedom, democracy, and human rights in them.
How can that not be satire?
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, January 09 2015 09:05 PM (2yngH)
3
The key to satire is that you -stop-, and if someone goes "I think this might possibly be satire," you respond with "indeed, how could it be anything else?" If someone says, "This is ridiculous and you are an idiot for advocating it," you respond with "it's satire, how could anyone possibly actually think these things?"
You don't go onto Twitter to defend your satire. (I say "defend", but there's not a lot of actual conversation going on there; "restate the points of the article as people yell at me for being a twit" is probably more correct. Twitter sucks as a venue for this kind of conversation.)
That doesn't mean it's honest, but if it is not, at this point it is not humor or wit, but just plain trolling.
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at Friday, January 09 2015 10:49 PM (ZeBdf)
4
It's a new art form. I call it Found Satire. It's when someone presents an argument so ill-considered, so deeply irrational and disturbing, that it becomes a compelling case for the diametrically opposing position.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, January 09 2015 11:13 PM (PiXy!)
5
So, Juxtaposing this against recent events. Did the fluffyhead who thinks she can legislate people out of badthinking propose punishments for Badthink? And did those punishments look anything like what happened in the offices of Charlie Hebdo, or just like the fellow in Saudi Arabia who is getting 1000 lashes?
I mean, if she's really serious about this....
Posted by: Mauser at Monday, January 12 2015 01:51 PM (TJ7ih)
6
Yup, 25 to life in re-education camp for Badthought.
I'm still pretty convinced it's satire; after declaring her undying support for freedom of speech she provides twenty numbered and increasingly deranged paragraphs of things she'd outlaw, climaxing with:
20. Speech which is found to be irresponsible, unethical, antisocial, hurtful, impolite, uncivil, abusive, distasteful, and/or unacceptable in general.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, January 13 2015 12:49 AM (2yngH)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
06:31 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
Saturday, January 03
Kei
So, my New Year's Resolution was to set up Kei, my shiny new Windows PC that has been waiting to be assembled and installed for... More than two years.
And done. Not perfect, but done.* Finished about 3AM today.
Since I had a lot of parts to play with, even though many are two years old, the result is pretty good: 8-core 3.6GHz CPU, Radeon 7950, 32GB RAM, 2 x 960GB SSDs, 5 x 2TB disks, and a Blu-Ray burner for burning all my Blu-Rays. 22 USB ports (8 x USB 3 and 14 x USB 2), and 12 x 1/8" audio ports for that perfect 16.2 mix.
Currently Kei is hooked up to a spare 1600x1200 monitor and I'm sharing the keyboard and mouse via Synergy, which works perfectly except that the Windows Do you want to allow this program to do stuff? dialog flicks me to the primary monitor on Nagi every time. (Update: The solution for this is the obvious one - plug the keyboard into Kei and share in the opposite direction. Works great now.)
Now I have a bit of an install party going on. I built Nagi late in 2008 when the original Kei went flaky due to faulty memory. So Nagi has everything installed. Despite a few hiccups over the years, that adds up to 841 applications.
I'm hoping to whittle that down a bit. Really, I just need my JetBrains IDEs, Microsoft Office, Adobe Creative Cloud, Visual Studio, Sony's creative software, Notepad++, Cygwin, VirtualBox, Chrome, Firefox, Firefox DE, iTunes, Clementine, Steam, Origin, Xshell, Xftp, Zoom Player, Python and Ruby and about a hundred libraries for each, uTorrent, Bryce, Carrara, Hexagon, Poser, virtual machines running CentOS 7 and Ubuntu 14.04...
Hmm. This might take a while.
The other thing I need to do is decide on a new monitor; my Dell U2711 is visibly declining. Right now, my short list is either the Philips 40" 3840x2160 monitor or a couple of Dell's new U2515H 2560x1440 screens. The Dell is about half the price of the Philips and has about half the pixel count, so it all balances out. The only real problem with the Philips monitor is that it has a static television-type stand, where the Dell is height adjustable and rotates on all three axes. Well, that and 40" is huge.
* As usual, the disk layout isn't what I wanted. Windows 8.1 denies the existence of my motherboard's RAID functions, and it also denies the existence of either my Adaptec RAID card or my cheap dual-port SATA card, so after much messing around I'm left with RAID-0 for the local drives and one drive not doing anything at all. Plus the SSDs aren't on the first two SATA ports, so it seems that Windows put a boot partition on one of the disk drives, so if that ever dies Kei won't boot any more.
But those minor issues aside, the dual SSDs, eight cores, and 32GB of RAM really makes a difference.
1
I don't think I have 22 USB devices, let alone need 22 ports for them!
Great googly moogly, Pixy's created Skynet.
Posted by: Wonderduck at Sunday, January 04 2015 04:04 PM (jGQR+)
2
I'm pretty sure I have 22 USB devices if I gather everything together. But this is a slightly older motherboard, so it has lots of USB 2 but only a couple of USB 3 ports (14 and 2 respectively). I added a 2-port USB 3 card, then I found a cheap 4-port USB 3 card and added that as well.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, January 04 2015 04:44 PM (PiXy!)
3
And I've installed 399 programs so far, so I'm on track to exceed Nagi's count later this week...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, January 04 2015 04:45 PM (PiXy!)
4
Can you uninstall the "French Spam" attraction plugin for The Pond? :-(
Posted by: Wonderduck at Wednesday, January 07 2015 05:37 AM (jGQR+)