1
Steam says I have a combined 95 hours in Sakura Dungeon, HuniePop, and HunieCam Studio. The rest of the bundle is at least amusing wallpaper.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at Saturday, September 09 2017 01:25 AM (tgyIO)
2
I can endorse HuniePop, it's a blast.
I can... what's the opposite of endorse... Sakura Spirit.
Posted by: Wonderduck at Saturday, September 09 2017 06:20 PM (1zQhi)
3
I can also add that a few of the Steam achievements for HuniePop are actually challenging, and you can't get them in the same run (he says, having tried to score without booze, conversation, or trait upgrades...).
HunieCam Studio, on the other hand, was easy to 100%, and the only reason not to get all of the non-grindy achievements in Sakura Dungeon is that some of them are broken unless you have the beta 1.05 patch.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at Wednesday, September 13 2017 03:03 PM (tgyIO)
Not a perfect Deadpool film, but quite a good one, and vastly more entertaining than the stifling Civil War. Being Deadpool, it is of course ultra-violent and utterly profane, so probably not one for the kiddies.
The main problem is that it's the origin story, and we've had enough goddam origin stories. Getting the gang together stories are still cool (Avengers, Guardians) but it's time for the origin story to be buried for good.
Apart from that it succeeds at what it set out to do, and showed it in the cinemas, making $750 million at the box office on a budget of less than $60 million. The Avengers made twice as much, but on four times the budget, so that's a pretty spectacular return.
Recommended - if you like that sort of thing. If you've read any Deadpool comics, you know what to expect, and you get it.
1
I had checked out of Marvel years before Deadpool was created, so I was only vaguely aware of the character. For that reason, Yet Another Origin Story didn't bother me.
Doctor Strange, on the other hand, could have been a much better film if they'd had the confidence to jump in at the deep end. I liked it for what it was, and most of the actors were terrific, but even setting aside the absurdity of "sling rings", going from zero to Dormammu in one movie was just too much.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at Tuesday, September 05 2017 02:56 AM (tgyIO)
2
Be sure to check out the "How it Should have Ended" for Dr. Strange.
Posted by: Mauser at Tuesday, September 05 2017 09:33 AM (TYvUn)
3
Yes, Doctor Strange was another decent film that would have been much better without the origin baggage. The cast was fantastic.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, September 05 2017 10:11 AM (PiXy!)
I hadn't seen it before because it sounded tedious and stupid.
It is.
And I'm saying "stupid" in the context of a film series where past outings have included a giant flying alien mecha-snake as the chief villain.
This is a charmless, joyless, tiresome piece of crap; four hours of unlikable characters throwing the idiot ball back and forth.
At least it was on Netflix.
One star for.... No. Zero stars. Avoid.
I went back and watched the first hour of The Avengers. While it's also overlong and flabby with an indifferent plot, the dialog, characterisation, and action sequences are on an entirely different level to Civil War. Avengers is a fun film with some significant flaws; Civil War is drudgery.
The Avengers:
Steve Rogers: I wanna know why Loki let us take him. He's not leading an army from here.
Bruce Banner: I don't think we should be focusing on Loki. That guy's brain is a bag full of cats. You can smell crazy on him.
Thor: Have a care how you speak! Loki is beyond reason, but he is of Asgard and he is my brother!
Natasha Romanoff: He killed eighty people in two days.
Thor: He's adopted.
1
I found Age Of Ultron to be such a tedious slog that I still haven't gotten around to Civil War. It's like all the division heads at Marvel got a memo saying, "Suck Harder", and they forget to CC the folks making Deadpool and Logan. (just the movies...)
-j
Posted by: J Greely at Monday, September 04 2017 09:28 AM (tgyIO)
2
This was significantly worse than Age of Ultron.
But thanks for reminding me that I haven't seen Deadpool.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, September 04 2017 11:17 AM (PiXy!)
About a month ago, I noted that two Australian politicians had been found after years in parliament to have never been eligible for election because our constitution forbids anyone holding dual citizenship with another country from becoming a federal representative or senator.
The number is now seven confirmed instances and at least another eight possible cases - including the Deputy Prime Minister and the Senate opposition leader. Labor (the opposition party right now) are sitting on documentation of citizenship status after originally promising to release it, so there are almost certainly more shoes set to drop in coming weeks.
All of which means, basically, nothing, because no-one cares about Australian politics, least of all Australians.
1
Heck, if we can't stop ineligible people from holding Federal office here in the US, what hope do you have?
What, I was talking about Hillary Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State, which was clearly unconstitutional.
Posted by: Rick C at Wednesday, August 30 2017 11:56 PM (ECH2/)
2
Can you imagine the fuss if someone read over the US Constitution and realised that Mike Pence, Chuck Schumer, and a dozen other senior elected officials were all ineligible for their positions?
Here it's just... Meh.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, August 31 2017 01:28 AM (PiXy!)
3
Is there a punishment for this? Is there a way to actually remove them from office, or prevent them from running in the next election?
Posted by: Rick C at Thursday, August 31 2017 05:45 AM (ECH2/)
4
It's gone to the High Court (equivalent of the Supreme Court). The statutory remedy is removal from office and a fine of £100. Which shows how little attention has been paid to this rule, as Australia has been on decimal currency since 1966.
Many of those involved were born in Australia, but have dual citizenship according to the laws of another country - which may not even have a procedure for renouncing citizenship.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, August 31 2017 12:19 PM (PiXy!)
The one overriding rule is this: If you are going to make a comedic animated buddy copy movie for children starring anthropomorphic talking animals, first and foremost it must be a good buddy cop movie.
It is.
I hadn't seen it before because I believed the hype to be overblown. Maybe the hype was overblown, but it's still a damn good film. Recommended.
But now I have two episodes of Made in Abyss to catch up on.
(Checks site.)
Four episodes. A very long week.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
03:55 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.
Saturday, August 12
The End Of Google?
Call for Mr Betteridge. Mr Betteridge to the courtesy phone please.
Unless you've been sleeping peacefully under a rock for the past week - in which case, congratulations - you'll be aware that Google fired an employee. With over 70,000 employees under the Alphabet umbrella, this is something that must happen every day of the year, but in this case it was handled so ineptly that the resulting chaos resembled a bored teenager setting off a cherry bomb in a nest of crazy ants.
What happened was this: James Damore, a biologist working for Google in some unspecified capacity, disagreed with Google's methods for meeting its diversity quotas and wrote a memo suggesting adjustments to the company's approach. Damore, being a nerd, evidently forgot that if Rule 1 of Corporate America is CYA, Rule 1a is Don't rock the boat.
The usual suspects leaked this internal memo to the ever-hungry outrage mobs and the mainstream media - if there is any distinction these days - and the relatively dull memo was immediately spun into a latter-day Mein Kampf. Within a day, the CEO of Google publicly announced the firing of the suddenly inconvenient Damore.
When the CEO of a major public company has to personally address the firing of a single, fairly low-level employee, who has broken no laws nor done anything that - without the leak - anyone outside the company would have even known about, it means that the corporate structure has screwed up, badly.
And the nature and scale of the panic exhibited by Google makes it clear that engineers are no longer running the show.
And that is a huge problem for Google.
We implicitly trust engineers because we know they view the rest of humanity with benign indifference, as long as we don't gum up the works. Engineers want to build things, and they enjoy seeing the things they build getting put to use. An engineer-led Google could be trusted implicitly with your email, because they were far more interested in shaving another fifty milliseconds off the response time of the search box than they were in anything you could possibly be mailing back and forth, short of a solution to the Goldbach Conjecture.
The Outrage Mobs, on the other hand, don't care about building things, don't think in fact that anything should be built, but are passionately interested in what you say and what you think and what your motives are.
And if the mobs are gaining power inside Google, as they seem to be, that means there is no longer that implicit trust, that rather, we can expect sooner or later the backlash will take the step from fellow employees to customers.
Which would be utterly disastrous for Google, of course, but as I said, the mobs aren't interested in building things.
Google have so far responded with profound ineptitude to what should really have been a trivial internal problem solved by a chat with HR. What they do next could save or doom the entire company.
If I were playing the market, I'd go long on Amazon and Microsoft right now.
1
I haven't trusted Google in a LONG time. Hell, ever since gmail came out and they explicitly stated they would violate your privacy algorithmically to show ads at you.
The problem is they've got their tentacles intertwined with so much of the internet that they are impossible to avoid. Whether it's the cultural expression like "Google it" or how many websites use the google apis, the most thorough web spiders, the co-opting of the entire history of Usenet into "Google Groups", Android Phones, Chrome, you name it, they've infiltrated everything.
Posted by: Mauser at Sunday, August 13 2017 03:23 AM (TYvUn)
2
This could be the beginning of a preference cascade. I've seen a LOT of people commenting on blogs--including, for example, ESR's--that they're taking this as an opportunity to divest from Google products: switching browsers, search engines, email, etc.
Posted by: Rick C at Sunday, August 13 2017 06:07 AM (ITnFO)
3
Yep. All else aside, it's clear that the company is focused on things other than engineering, and that's all I care about from them.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, August 13 2017 01:13 PM (PiXy!)
4
Microsoft is no better. I know this because of the 0xB16B00B5 scandal, when an awful excuse for a human, Matthew Garrett, made them fire an unnamed employee. At least they never released his name. But then it was a while ago.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Sunday, August 13 2017 02:30 PM (pjL8P)
5
As for divesting from Google, I've done what I could years ago, when the so-called "doodle" became too obnoxious.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Sunday, August 13 2017 02:31 PM (pjL8P)
6
Microsoft is flawed, but they have kept the company under control. Google blew it this past week. Badly.
I used to run my own mail server, even my own DNS server, but using Google was too convenient. I think it's time to dust them off again.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, August 13 2017 03:58 PM (PiXy!)
7
I'm thinking, "0xB16B00B5?" Is that like the F00F bug?
And then - oh. Yeah. I do remember that.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, August 13 2017 04:09 PM (PiXy!)
8
DuckDuckGo has been mentioned as an alternative.
Posted by: muon at Tuesday, August 15 2017 03:59 PM (vMYTH)
9
DuckDuckGo is pretty good. I turned it off yesterday when I was frantically searching for better information on the differences in automatic serialisation between releases of PHP (it's a complete crapfest), but I don't think Google actually gave me better results.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, August 15 2017 05:33 PM (PiXy!)
10
The search function is not anywhere near the biggest problem with Google, precisely because you can easily substitute it. But what are you going to do with mail addresses that are stuck in a large number of websites? You want a bored SJW at Google to change passwords for your bank accounts or have your ISP shut down your account? Because you can easily do this and more by having an access to one's e-mail.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Wednesday, August 23 2017 03:59 AM (pjL8P)
11
Yes, email and Android are the really sticky problems here.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, August 23 2017 04:41 PM (PiXy!)
Not sure why I keep getting credits, but between that and pre-paying a year in advance I got what was initially an $80/month server for $37.50 a month.
That includes 100TB of bandwidth, which works out to 0.0375¢ per GB.
Amazon charges 9¢ - 240 times as much.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:40 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 55 words, total size 1 kb.