What happened? Twelve years! You hit me with a cricket bat! Ha! Twelve years!
Saturday, October 23
Hit The Ground Running
Another group decided to pick up Super Doll Licca-Chan and fansub that. The first four episodes were subbed in 2004, and it's been languishing ever since.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:21 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
Strange Dawn
This one saw a commercial release back in the dim distant dawn of time, but only 8 episodes of 13 ever came out then it dried up and blew away. Which made me a sad small mop-headed panda, because it's a surprisingly good show.
Now, after billions of years (anime years), it's being fansubbed. Usual places.
3 headcats out of 4, maybe more, since I've never had a chance to see the whole series.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:09 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 76 words, total size 1 kb.
So our hero has a little sister who likes playing, uh, dating sims. In particular, little sister, uh, dating sims. Adults-only little sister uh, dating sims, which she isn't (adult, not little sister, which she is).
Should suck. Doesn't so far. The father is freaking Gendo Ikari. Still doesn't suck.
My favourite character is the girl-next-door-childhood-friend-romantic-interest-to-whom-the-hero-is-completely-oblivious. She's quite well-handled, not a tsundere, not hopeless or helpless, and not stupid. She is shy, but it looks like she's prepared to haul out the cluebat of love if she has to.
Another 2.5 headcats out of 4 - so far - and the most likely to make that extra 0.5 as the show progresses.
1
This season's bishoujo anime are a veritable minefield. I've written comments about this little-sister show on a half-dozen blogs & trashed the comments without sending each time because I can't come up with a way of expressing how I feel about it without coming off all postmodern sinners-in-the-hand-of-an-angry-god judgmental. The problem is that {rant censored. again}... damnit! There I go again! And yet, it isn't half-bad, if you can just forget for a moment how the nature of the fandom in question is so {rant censored}
At least The World God Only Knows dodges the whole issue by leaving it at galge, not getting into the usual eroge aspect of those games, and by-damn not touching {rant censored. one more time}.
Posted by: Mitch H. at Saturday, October 23 2010 10:31 PM (jwKxK)
2
I know what you mean, Mitch. They should all be shot.
Preferably out of a cannon and into the Sun.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, October 25 2010 02:04 AM (PiXy!)
3
Makes me wonder how many fanboys would be willingly shot into the heart of the sun for the opportunity to travel, however briefly, into space.
Posted by: Mitch H. at Tuesday, October 26 2010 07:16 AM (jwKxK)
So our hero spends all his time capturing girls in dating sims (on an apparently self-repairing PSP) and is set to capture demons (literally) from real-life girls by capturing the girls' hearts (figuratively).
Which he does by applying dating-sim tropes.
Should suck. Surprisingly, does not. Not great, but by no means terrible, silly and amusing and perfect for a rainy Saturday, which is exactly what it is where I am. 2.5 headcats out of four.
1
It's fun. Not as much fun as the manga (which needs brought over to the US, immediately, damnit!), though. The studio went overboard on the moe-ification. Elcea is a goofy sidekick in the manga, not a haremette.
Posted by: Mitch H. at Saturday, October 23 2010 10:40 PM (jwKxK)
Yosuga no Sora, surprise boobies (and occasional meido) anime scores 2.5 headcats out of 4. 2 for the show itself, and a bonus 0.5 for the meido omake.
That's not the opening. It's not the ending either. It's the second ending. It think this show was made by hobbits.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
07:44 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.
Radeyawn
So AMD has released the first of the Radeon 6000 cards, and they're, how shall I put this, underwhelming.
The previous high-end cards were the 5850 and 5870; we now have the 6850 and 6870, which are actually slower than their counterparts from last year. What AMD appear to have done is bump the numbers up a notch, so that the new midrange cards - what would have been the 6750 and 6770 - are now sold in the high-end number range, where they fail to impress.
The real high-end cards will now be the 6950 and 6970, due to launch next month. For now, we have a 6870 with about the same price and performance and power consumption of the old 5850.
I had a very different article drafted based on the leaked specs from last weak. Unfortunately it turned out that the leak was a lie, and the truth was much less interesting.
This isn't all AMD's fault, though: The new chips were originally designed to be built on TSMC's 32nm process. Since TSMC doesn't have a 32nm process, AMD was forced to change its plans, which ended up making the chips slower and hotter and more expensive. The real next-gen cards should land next year, assuming TSMC pull their finger out.
Pricing in Oz is varied to say the least, ranging from a quite reasonable A$288 for the 6870, including 10% sales tax (for a US$240 card, about A$245) to a frankly delusional A$500. Ignoring the crazy prices at the high end, the new cards are at least decent value for money.
All in all, though, I think I'll stick with my 4850 for a while longer.
1 Altera has first 28nm TSMC silicon, where is AMD and Nvidia? Also Nvidia CEO on why Fermi failed:
http://wp.me/psH60-1WS
Posted by: Daniel at Monday, October 25 2010 02:06 AM (8H1a5)
2
Altera and Xilinx always seem to jump on the newest process before anyone else. But their high-end stuff is pretty low volume compared to what Nvidia and AMD need to churn out.
Interesting point about Fermi. I'll be looking forward to seeing what they can achieve after a respin to better match the realities of 40nm.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, October 25 2010 02:33 AM (PiXy!)
3
My desktop has been incredibly unstable. Fits of locking up at random times. I'd put it down to a bad motherboard or flaky power supply.
Rather than upgrade everything, I decided to turf the 9800GTX. Picked up a 5770 for pocket change.
It now runs fine & quite a lot cooler. I blame the BVidia drivers.
The general state of PC components leave a lot to be desired.
Posted by: Andrew at Monday, October 25 2010 08:28 AM (cB03i)
4
The 5770 is great value for money. I've considered replacing my 4850 with a pair of 5770s in Crossfire, but haven't actually got around to it yet.
Waiting to see what the 6770 turns out to be - leaks say it's just a tweaked 5770, not a new chip, but leaks have been wrong before.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, October 25 2010 10:33 AM (PiXy!)
While I agree with most of those points, I was interested to see how, exactly, Hollywood had lied about the Scopes trial. I had no particular reason to doubt that there were distortions in Inherit the Wind, so I followed the link to see what was said.
What was said was an abjectly dishonest apology for creationist claptrap. When you see phrases like:
the purported evidence for evolution
you know you're not in for an honest debate about Hollywood's representation of a historic trial.
They pass of straightforward falsehoods like:
Indeed, the case for evolution remains far from satisfying standards of
verifiable science.
With equally straightforward misrepresentations and ad hominems:
This is evident in the current vociferous debate
between two of evolution’s most outstanding high priests, Stephen J.
Gould and Richard Dawkins.
That current vociferous debate was about rates of evolutionary change on the local scale and the contigent nature of evolution. Which is to say, there is no doubt at all that evolution happened; rather, there were questions about the reconstruction of the process on short timescales.
The Scopes Trial took place more than 70 years ago. Nevertheless its
legacy continues to be felt in the series of legal battles currently
being fought in courts across the USA.
Fought by the creationists, and lost, because what they are attempting to do is replace science education in public schools with their religious beliefs, and that is not just an affront to every right-thinking individual, but actually against the First Amendment.
Sorry, Kathy, on this one point you were right the first time, back when you were left.
One way the Scopes trial has been misrepresented is that it is usually strongly implied, if not outright stated, that Mr. Scopes was wrongly convicted.
In fact, he was guilty and the jury correctly found him to be guilty. He violated a state law that forbade the teaching of evolution. Whether such a law should have been on the books is an entirely different question, but it was and he broke it.
Now having said that, some of the stuff you quoted was bogus, and I'm not defending that site. For instance, there is no "current" debate between Gould and Dawkins because Gould died in 2002. (And Dawkins is dying now.)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Thursday, October 21 2010 04:05 PM (+rSRq)
2
Dawkins is... You're not thinking of Christopher Hitchens, are you?
Anyway, yeah, Scopes was guilty by the letter of the law and everyone knew it; he volunteered for the trial as a test case and public relations gambit.
In fairness to that site, while the URL is dated 2006, the article seems to date from 1998, when the debate, and Gould, were still current - and long before the creationists got smacked down again in Pennsylvania. In fairness to everyone else, the article is still crap.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, October 21 2010 04:39 PM (PiXy!)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Thursday, October 21 2010 05:54 PM (+rSRq)
4
I did that once... I was looking for info on Fugates for my evolution teacher who demanded that I back up my insane assertion that there were ( at any given time less than 50) blue people living in Kentucky and the Virginia panhandle... I Found what appeared to be a well researched link rich and footnoted link... skimmed it... sent it... and then realized the second after I hit send that it was a creationist site... and page 2 was claiming that Fugates were the product of women having relations with demons or something.....
Awk... Ward
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Friday, October 22 2010 12:31 AM (EJaOX)
Posted by: brickmuppet at Friday, October 22 2010 08:17 AM (EJaOX)
6
It's not like creationists twist the facts any more than global warmists. It's ok to quote them as long as you verify and stay vigilant about their agenda.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Saturday, October 23 2010 04:07 AM (9KseV)
7
The creationists flat-out lie, and do so incessently. They lie about what they are doing, they lie about why, they lie about
biology and geology and statistics and everything else. And they're stupid enough to have documented all this. And they're playing chicken with the First Amendment. With the current Supreme Court they're just plain screwed, and good riddance to them.
The warmists, well, that's a little different. There's real science there, though it's taken a back seat to the politics and activism and snake-oil peddlers... Excuse me, I mean "carbon offset" scams. Schemes, carbon offset schemes. CO2 levels are up, temperatures are up, ice is down, and there is good reason for concern and an urgent need for more rigorous study. Unfortunately, what we've got is Kyoto and ClimateGate and Cap'n'Trade.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Saturday, October 23 2010 04:51 PM (PiXy!)
Anyways, there's this site called Foursquare, and apparently it fall down go boom just recently. Possibly more than once.
They're running MongoDB, a database I tested and rejected earlier this year when looking for more elegant substitutes for MySQL. I don't like SQL - never have - but it works, and MongoDB... Doesn't.
Foursquare had two database servers with their database split ("sharded") across them. The servers are Amazon EC2 instances, with 66GB of RAM each, fairly large by most people's standards. The problem arose when one of the database shards got bigger than the available RAM.
...
If you had any experience with databases before, say, 2007, you'll be shaking your head in disbelief at this point. If you had any experience before, say, 1997, you'll be dumbfounded. Yes, the site fell over because the database didn't fit in RAM.
The total database size at the time of the outage was around 120GB. At my day job - and though Foursquare is a small startup, my day job is at an even smaller startup - we add 400GB of data to our databases every single day. Mind you, we do things to MySQL that would make the average DBA give up and go into volcanology as a safer bet, but it works.
Now, when I was considering MongoDB, the first thing I did was test its performance. The second thing I did was test how it behaved in out-of-memory conditions. (It crashed.) Seems that Foursquare forgot to ask the second question.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Tuesday, October 19 2010 12:56 AM (9KseV)
2
Sharding actually made the situation a lot worse for them. The chunk-split code was spectacularly expensive in the first 1.6.x releases, and was the worst possible thing to do when you were running out of physical memory. They're rapidly improving it, but when you combine the effect of database fragmentation on their memory-mapping, the slow and costly chunk splits, and the server-wide locks, Foursquare was facing a messy recovery even without any bugs.
Without sharding, their performance would have degraded gradually as the working set exceeded available RAM; if you can avoid full table scans, 2x RAM is still fast, and 3x is pretty good (modulo virtual-server bugs). With sharding in its current state, they either needed to start out with twice as many shards, or put SSDs into them to reduce the cost of paging (not really an option in Amazon's cloud).
I've spent a lot of time talking with the guys at 10gen, and they're smart and capable, but I make sure I never forget that Eliot's dev laptop has a fast Core i7, 8GB of RAM, and a 512GB SSD. :-)
(...and my MongoDB server would dance with joy if it had 66GB of RAM or an SSD...)
-j
Posted by: J Greely at Tuesday, October 19 2010 01:14 AM (2XtN5)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, October 19 2010 12:33 PM (PiXy!)
4
Heh. In many ways, my choice of MongoDB was driven by Someone Else's Project. It's going to be used in a much more important piece of our back-end service, so while they were off designing and architecting, I was smoke-testing it in an area with no direct customer impact. We now have nearly four months of solid experience with it, and the SEP still hasn't hit QA, so we're way ahead of them.
Significantly, when I had Eliot and Roger on site a while back, one of my questions was about dealing with fragmentation. At that time, it had only just become possible to query the server and find out how badly fragmented you were, and the now-urgent online defragmentation (as opposed to tedious copy/promote or offline repair) was still in the "yeah, we can do that at some point" stage.
After a few months of deliberate testing, my collated daily archive collection is now heavily fragmented, to the point that even though it has over 400GB of free space, it still occasionally allocates a new 2GB extent for indexing. Someday I'll need to free up a terabyte on another server, copy the collection to it, then make it the new master. Before I fill the disk with half-empty datafiles.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at Tuesday, October 19 2010 02:27 PM (2XtN5)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Tuesday, October 19 2010 02:40 PM (+rSRq)
6
OK, no sharding with Mongo. Got it. A new tenet of cargo cult engineering is being committed to stone tablets as I post this comment.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Wednesday, October 20 2010 01:04 AM (9KseV)
7
Oh no. Is choice-of-databases a new religious war, the way OS's have been, and development languages?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Wednesday, October 20 2010 02:09 PM (+rSRq)
8
Oh, it gets worse. You always had the war between Oracle, Postgres, Mysql, and MS Sql Server, with the DB2 guys hanging out in the corner looking smug. Now you have Schema versus Other, with a large number of fundamentally different technologies lumped together under the "NoSQL" label, which some of the less strident have begun claiming means "Not Only SQL" instead of the obvious.
They get huge buzz because it's easy to throw something together in a real hurry and pitch the demo to an investor, usually in combination with Ruby On Rails or another rapid-prototyping framework. And, just like Rails, they tend to fail in interesting ways when you take your demo and put it into production. The MongoDB rant Pixy linked to covers it nicely, and the followup on Ruby nails it to the wall (while sadly overstating the virtues of PHP, but that's a side issue...).
It's easy to start throwing data into MongoDB and slapping a web interface on it with Rails. It's also often a substitute for defining the actual problem and designing the right solution. Pixy's blogging on the subject is more effort than most people put into their VC pitch, much less their code. :-)
-j
Posted by: J Greely at Wednesday, October 20 2010 04:45 PM (2XtN5)
Only the second one in a decade, and the last one (Matter) was very good indeed (much better than The Algebraist, Banks' previous non-Culture SF book).
1
Ah, The Algebraist had its charm. But a new Culture novel? Out in time for Christmas? I'd better ask my brother to get it for me before he asks me to get it for him! ;p
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at Thursday, October 14 2010 09:57 AM (pWQz4)