Now? You want to do this now? I have a right to know! I'm getting married in four hundred and thirty years!
Thursday, September 14
Lights, Action, Camera!
I'm in the market for a new camera.
I have a Sony DSC-S85, which is quite a good camera, but it's rather slow (really bad for action shots), has only a modest zoom range, and only supports Memory Stick cards up to 128MB.
I'm not a professional photographer, or even close, and for the most part I'm planning on taking outdoor photos for web use. I need a camera that is fast, easy to use, not overly bulky, not overly expensive, has a good zoom lens, and can take a decent sized memory card.
I'm thinking of getting the Panasonic FZ50. It's not a pocket camera by any means (it's bigger than my S85), but 10 megapixels and a stabilised 12x Leica lens? Works for me.
Yes, a digital SLR would be better. But a digital SLR with a couple of decent lenses would run twice the price of the FZ50. And I'm not going to be producing A3 prints of my photos; I'm going to be scaling them down, if anything.
1
The classes converge recently, with the so-called "advanced" camera like the FZ50 nearing the SLR class. The SLR manufacturers responded with things like Canon EOS 350 (aka "Digital Rebel XT" - I'm still waiting for "Analog Conformist" lineup). I got mine for $780 or so here. The formal price is $799, which is not quite 2 times higher than FZ50. The latter retails between $550 and $599 here. I went with the Canon because for 45% more I was getting the CompactFlash, instant shutter (HATE the lag), and, of course, the lens. Both choices are overkill for the web. The main reason I wanted something better than the trusty Canon A40 was its completely crappy low-light performance., and not the resolution. The 350 though is magnificent. Almost no graining at ISO 800.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Friday, September 15 2006 12:59 AM (9imyF)
2
Low light performance is a very good reason for going with the DSLR. Bigger sensor equals more photons. I don't think that's going to be a big concern for me, though.
I just checked. The FZ50 costs $975 here (I might be able to get it cheaper, but that's what it retails for), and the EOS 350 body costs $1159. $1249 for the EOS 400. The 400 with two Canon lenses (18-55 and 75-300) is $1579. So about 60% more, not double. And the EOS 400 is a better camera than the FZ50, no question.
But I'm not sure I have $1579. :(
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, September 15 2006 02:03 AM (FRalS)
Vaguely relevant. (Apparently the answer to my question was "Yes".)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Friday, September 15 2006 02:34 AM (+rSRq)
4
Search for zoom lensed camera reviews, but go at least two pages deep and only look at reviews that are two years old.
Buy whatever was really hot two years ago. It should cost about as much as the entry level 2006 stuff.
Posted by: Kristopher at Friday, September 15 2006 10:29 AM (O5Ju8)
5
Another option is to pickup a 300D on Ebay. <sob>They are going for a song.</sob>
As much as I'd like a newer 400D. I've just scratched the surface with the 300D and need extra lenses before I consider a newer camera.
A good alternative is the Canon Powershot G7. 10 megapixel, 6X zoom (not quite as good as the Pana, iso1600 max for $899 listed.
I tend to prefer the pictures from Canon cameras. Generally more subdued and detailed to my eye.
Posted by: Andrew at Friday, September 15 2006 08:12 PM (t8tOu)
6
Thanks Andrew. I'll check out the Canon as well.
It's a lot smaller and lighter than the Panasonic (6x vs 12x lens will do that).
There's also the Powershot S3 IS - it's only 6 megapixels, but it's still 12x zoom and $300 cheaper.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, September 15 2006 09:55 PM (FRalS)
7 IMO smaller and lighter is good for most cameras. Especially when its impromptu stuff. Not much good missing that great photo since I've left the DSLR at home. Which is usually the case.
WKC picked up a Powershot S80 (which I don't think is available here) over in Hong Kong. Its seems to be the middle ground between the G7 and the S3.
In reality 6 megapixels is high enough detail for printing most normal shots. Even with cropping.
Posted by: Andrew at Friday, September 15 2006 11:01 PM (t8tOu)
Andrew makes a good point - the picture you take on a cheap compact that you have with you is better than the picture you don't take because you left your bulky DSLR at home.
Maybe I'll look for a good mini camera for now, and save for a DSLR later.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, September 18 2006 05:17 AM (0Lkqa)
10
I've had a play with the IXUS 800 and various IXI (is that the plural) at the local DSE Powerhouse.
Altho I quite liked the IXUS 65 which has a 3" screen. The only sacrifice on the 65 was to fit such a large screen meant losing the optical view finder.
Some terrific shots wide angle shots by TJ. The backgrounds are so clear.
Posted by: Andrew at Monday, September 18 2006 08:05 PM (t8tOu)
11
Here is the final solution .... we'll wait patently for you to save yer pennies for this 160 megapixil beast ....
One cost of living in Australia: With one fifteenth the population of America, and effectively one anime distributor, we don't get sales like this. I could order it from Robert, but by the time I take into account shipping, customs fees, and Australian sales tax, it ain't so cheap any more.
Plus, I already have the Ah! My Goddess movie, Ai Yori Aoshi, Armitage, El Hazard, Lain, all of Mahoromatic, Read or Die, Sol Bianca, Sugar, Tenchi Muyo, Trigun... And two copies of Haibane Renmei.* There's Stellvia - I have the fansub, but haven't watched it - but apart from that the most I'd be doing is replacing VHS tapes (or in some cases laserdiscs) with DVDs.
Now, if it was $5 per DVD from a store here in Sydney I'd be right there.
Also, small orders - less than $100 or so - are usually ignored as well.
But for small orders the shipping can cost nearly as much as the goods. At least it does if you get it shipped airmail, and having had a big surface mail shipment simply disappear without so much as an apology (much less any reimbursement) I don't do surface mail no more.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, September 13 2006 10:35 PM (FRalS)
3
"Surface" mail would have to come by ship; it could take weeks.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Thursday, September 14 2006 07:09 PM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Wonderduck at Wednesday, September 13 2006 08:59 AM (YWRlP)
2
Hmmm ... the spammers are targeting old posts for their comments.
Maybe freezing comments for posts over a week old would prevent this? It would also prevent some loony mission poster with a search engine from adding crap ...
Posted by: Kristopher at Wednesday, September 13 2006 10:20 AM (O5Ju8)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, September 13 2006 10:51 AM (0Lkqa)
4
Wasn't trying to backseat drive ... just thinking aloud ... considering options needed to make my own future blog easy to maintain.
I was considering starting a blog, but comments from other bloggers have put me off from using stuff like blogger.com.
Posted by: Kristopher at Wednesday, September 13 2006 12:24 PM (O5Ju8)
5
I comment on old posts sometimes, but I would not shed many tears if that were stopped. Many top of the line blogs have no comments whatsoever. Indeed, as someone said, "blogosphere is my comments board".
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Wednesday, September 13 2006 12:37 PM (9imyF)
6
Blogger sucks, or used to suck. They've been doing a lot of work on it lately.
I'm busy writing my own blogging system, which will go live later this year. It's pretty neat - even if it needs some better spam filtering tools. ;)
There will be both free/ad-supported and paid accounts available - the paid accounts will probably have more features available. And I'll have a certain number of free "pro" accounts to hand out as well, so just let me know if you're interested. :)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, September 14 2006 12:03 AM (FRalS)
7
I don't want to block off comments from old posts entirely, but what I may do (as soon as registration goes on-line) is require registration to comment on any posts older than, say, 14 days.
And honeypot them. For actual users, you won't see a comment form, so you can't comment. Spammers often just run through post numbers and hit them all in sequence - so anyone who tries to comment on a post that has comments disallowed is a spammer, and I can blacklist them automatically. Which makes me happy. :D
I enabled a simple honeypot the other day, and so far I've harvested 770 domains and 2200 IP addresses. Blocking IPs isn't worthwhile if it takes human intervention, but we already have 25 IPs that have sent us over 100 spams each, so it's working well. (And the spam block is very quick - a single indexed database lookup, and then increment the counter. Enormously faster than MT Blacklist.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, September 14 2006 12:11 AM (FRalS)
It's about time I stopped parasitizing other folks blogs ... ermmm, I meant, errrr .....
Posted by: Kristopher at Thursday, September 14 2006 01:36 PM (O5Ju8)
9
I'll move The Pond if you want me to, Pix ol' bean! I might be a good guineapigduck. After all, I'm relatively clueless when it comes to the 'behind the scenes' part of blogging, so if I can make it churn, anybody could!
Posted by: Wonderduck at Thursday, September 14 2006 08:58 PM (YWRlP)
10
As a Munuvian, you're automatically eligible for a free unlimited account. :)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, September 14 2006 11:12 PM (FRalS)
Pete Zaitcev doesn't like Media Factory. He's not alone there, but I have to disagree with his reasons.
Media Factory was the first, and so far the only, anime studio to take any action against the fansub community. They didn't sue anyone, but they did request that people remove any fansubs or links to fansubs of Media Factory properties. Which is certainly their legal right, but does break with the idea that fansubs are tacitly accepted - as long as the fansubs are withdrawn from distribution once a series is licensed outside Japan. (AnimeSuki in particular is very good about this.)
Now, you can understand why studios might be willing to accept this. Their major market is Japan. A show airs on TV, they get paid, and if it's a success they stand to make the big bucks on DVD sales and plushies. Getting licensed outside Japan is always a bonus, and it helps a lot if there's a fan base outside Japan. The American anime distributors keep an eye on what the fans are talking about when they decide what to license. (Usually. Sometimes they seem to be thinking of something else entirely.)
And fansubs drive that base.
So what happened to change Media Factory's mind? Well, they had something of a hit with a TV series called Kimi ga Nozomu Eien. Which I really really hate, but that's beside the point. They followed it up with a DVD release called Akane Maniax.
And it was on the fansub sites practically the day it hit the stores in Japan. Including "raws" - direct rips of the DVDs.
One might understandably get a little upset at that.
I love my fansubs, and I sometimes don't worry too much if I decide not to buy the DVDs afterwards because I've spent, um, a lot of money on anime over the past decade. (Including at least 15 Media Factory titles, just going from memory.) And I have fansubbed some episodes of the original Dirty Pair series myself*, and might even get back to completing the task one day.
But if the studio asked me not to, I would think no less of them for that.
* From someone else's script. I just edited it and fixed the timing and stuff.
1
Fansubs aren't responsible for the dvd rips floating around--Japanese dvd rippers do it and put it on various P2P (e.g. mostly Japanese ones like WinNY and SHARE) and that's where most fansubbers get their raw videos.
IIRC: Production I.G. asked fansubbers not to fansub Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex awhile ago (checking on ANN, looks like it was quite a bit less explicit than I remembered, but it did predate Media Factory by two years).
Posted by: Kayle at Wednesday, September 13 2006 12:37 PM (Qsm1J)
2
That's true, and AnimeSuki have a policy of never linking to raws, even though all the fansubs they do link to are of course produced from raws.
I looked at WinNY once but couldn't work it out. (I think I was after the new Pretty Sammy series, which hasn't been fansubbed yet.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, September 13 2006 10:47 PM (FRalS)
1. Toggle the Hold switch on and off. (Slide it to Hold, then turn it off again.)
2. Press and hold the Menu and Select buttons until the Apple logo appears, about 6 to 10 seconds. You may need to repeat this step.
Worked.
I think I must have done that by accident last time. When in doubt, mash the buttons.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:53 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.
Friday, September 08
Poit
Oops. My brain just melted.
Little kitties set to music from My Neighbour Totoro:
Really little kitties set to music from Kiki's Delivery Service:
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, September 10 2006 08:43 PM (0Lkqa)
7
These videos are adorable! Did you make them yourself? If so, then I would love to get "Message in Rouge" from Kiki's Delivery Service, from you, if it is not too much trouble. Your weblog is really pleasant and interesting to read, the layout is pretty, and you seem like someone with whom I would get along well.
Posted by: Gleffy at Friday, September 15 2006 05:22 PM (5CbWG)
I have the Kiki's Delivery Service soundtrack, but I don't know if that version of Message in Rouge is on it. I don't think I'd heard it before watching that video.
And thanks for all your kind words. ;)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Saturday, September 16 2006 12:00 AM (FRalS)
I was trying a new iced tea today (Tetley Peach and Orange, very nice) and noted that it contained even more sugar than the Lipton tea I normally drink. After consuming an entire 1.25 litre bottle of it, of course.*
And then I wondered just how sweet they could make it.
I don't think that even I could drink that. It would be like drinking honey, something I hardly ever do.
And you know how honey never spoils?** Plasmolysis. Makes sense; I was wondering where this magical natural antibiotic effect came from. It's nothing fancy, it just dehydrates the little buggers.
* A 1.25 litre bottle of this from the minimart downstairs from the food court I usually go to costs only slightly more than a 500ml bottle bought in the food court. The only problem is that I then tend to drink the whole thing over the course of the afternoon.
1
What kind of weird spam attack did you just suffer from? Is it just harassment?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Thursday, September 07 2006 09:30 AM (+rSRq)
2
Heh ... the recent comments are full of random crap.
Is somebody's spam engine broken? Or is your own machine filling your comment database with junk?
Posted by: Kristopher at Thursday, September 07 2006 10:37 AM (O5Ju8)
3
It looks like you have a new mu.nu forum user named "yseibertql".
I'll bet his comment spam is legible in Azerbejani or some such ....
Posted by: Kristopher at Thursday, September 07 2006 10:40 AM (O5Ju8)
4
I think it's just a crapflood, yeah. We've been getting that for a while now.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, September 07 2006 03:55 PM (0Lkqa)
5
It's rather strange. I can't right off think of why someone would do it. Only two things suggest themselves: it's simple harassment (of you), or it's someone debugging their package who for the moment doesn't want to reveal their message payload.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Thursday, September 07 2006 06:06 PM (+rSRq)
6http://www.honesttea.com/ goes in the other direction: they intentionally put a lot less sugar in their drinks--roughly half the calories compared to their (non-diet) competitors..
Posted by: Kayle at Friday, September 08 2006 03:32 AM (Qsm1J)
7
But then I couldn't fight off infections by plasmolysis!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, September 08 2006 05:23 AM (0Lkqa)
8
I prefer to fight infection by measured ammounts of disenfectant daily (typically by the .40 fl.oz.), but to each his own.
:-D
Posted by: tommy at Saturday, September 09 2006 10:48 PM (UynUa)