What happened?
Twelve years!
You hit me with a cricket bat!
Ha! Twelve years!
Monday, September 08
Slow News Day
So I'll do what all the big news people do... Baby animal pictures!

Posted by: Pixy Misa at
07:46 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Susie at Monday, September 08 2003 09:24 AM (UA6yw)
2
Awwww. While installing the wood floor at my parents' house yesterday morning, I turned on Animal Planet for background noise. They had polar bears...a mama bear and her two adorable cubs. It was all cute and sweet until they ate a baby seal. Then when a male bear started stalking them and ate a cub, my own mother had enough. We watched college football after that.
Posted by: Jennifer at Monday, September 08 2003 09:59 AM (rZmE1)
3
Yuck. Thanks, Jen--now I have to go to work with THAT image in my head....
Posted by: Susie at Monday, September 08 2003 10:37 AM (UA6yw)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, September 08 2003 11:36 AM (jtW2s)
5
If I had to be horrified, YOU have to be horrified.
Posted by: Jennifer at Monday, September 08 2003 05:31 PM (rZmE1)
Posted by: Cherry at Monday, September 08 2003 07:08 PM (i7dMY)
7
Firstly, on the cute babies: awwwww!
Secondly, I saw the frozen-baby-polar-bear-for-dinner show. Unfortunately, I was eating a popsicle at the time.
Posted by: LeeAnn at Tuesday, September 09 2003 01:15 PM (HxCeX)
8
New desktop pictures!
hln
Posted by: hln at Wednesday, September 10 2003 11:25 AM (CWwGn)
9
Oooooh, they're beautiful! I want one! Of each!
That second thing? That is why I refuse to watch Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom-type stuff. I had the horrible misfortune of seeing an adult male lion kill a females babies to make her come into heat. I love animals, but I'd have gladly shot his face off.
And, don't even get me started on those Nancy-boy, lame-ass, too-rich, ignorant wastes of life like Gerald McRaney (and Ted Nugent) who think it's cool to pay to kill exotic animals INSIDE a fence or cage. Talk about wanting to shoot someone's face off....EEEERRRRGGG.
Posted by: Stevie at Saturday, September 13 2003 04:03 PM (cySDt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Sunday, September 07
What If We Held A Convention
And
everyone came?
I think the people responsible for the CounterConvention have a slight problem. Check out this list of groups who have signed on as part of their RNC party-pooping program:
The Committee of Circular Flying Birds
Dwarves for the Responsible Control of Pliers
International Consortium of Those as Drunk as We Are
Glow Rabbit Society
Modern Drunkard Magazine
Society of Poop-Throwing Monkeys
John Dillinger Died for You Society
The Wow, Most People Think We're Idiots Association
Libs Against Basic Web Page Design (their motto: We’re too stupid to understand word wrap)
International Coalition of People Who Just Don't Get It
International Anti-Ismist Anti-Organisation
Bottle o' Pop Action Network
UNIX Users United for IMF Riots
Radical Anarchist Feminazis Against Veganism
Radical Anarchist Veganazis Against Feminism
Organization of People Who Always Show up at Protests
Sedated Gorillas for Masturbation and the Oppression of Iraqis by Devil Bush (We are a society of sedated Gorillas that only want the government to provide us our constitutionally-provided right to the pursuit of happiness, i.e., manual stimulation. And a free bottle of pop. And maybe a taco. It's our right goddamn it.)
Purple Polar Bear Society
Popular Front For the Liberation of This Website (All property is theft, including this website.)
Chocolate Chinchilla Coterie (An organization devoted to pitying the Angry Left while sipping martinis.)
ONOMATOPOEIA NOW! (Bang! Swish! Purr! Buzz!)
National Burping Society
Dead Penguins Society
Twinkies For The Ethical Treatment Of Twinkies
ZIG for Great Justice (Someone set us up the bomb. You are on your way to destruction. )
Australians Against Iowa Cornfields
Judean People's Front
Judean People's Behind
Die, Manatee Die!
Dreadlock Army (Too mellow to march.)
Tigers Are Great (Tigers are cool. Anyone who doesn't want to be a tiger is a fool.)
Organization of Bemused Onlookers
Oh yes, and:
Jimmy Taranto Fan Club (We love Best of the Web! )
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
01:29 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 321 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The Coalition to Save Us From All Marmite; It’s Pasty Evil
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, September 07 2003 01:34 AM (jtW2s)
2
The Clean Musk Ox union (
End capitalist (marmite) pollution of our musk ox supplies!)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, September 07 2003 01:34 AM (jtW2s)
Posted by: Ted at Sunday, September 07 2003 10:52 AM (2sKfR)
Posted by: Susie at Sunday, September 07 2003 10:54 AM (UA6yw)
5
I just followed the link and I scrolled through dozens of hilarious "organizations" and still didn't get to the parts of the list you listed....
one of my favorites was the coalition of people without shift keys....they're not timid, really...
Posted by: Susie at Sunday, September 07 2003 11:01 AM (UA6yw)
6
Susie, same here! This is some of the funniest crap I've ever read, and I'm still only 1/5 down the scroll bar. Be back in a couple hours!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at Sunday, September 07 2003 09:39 PM (Ll8Sl)
7
Wait a minute...I must have missed the Australians Against Iowa Cornfields earlier.
Posted by: Jennifer at Monday, September 08 2003 10:02 AM (rZmE1)
8
Well, looks like they finally cleared all the funny ones. Dang.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at Tuesday, September 09 2003 09:41 PM (68FmU)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, September 09 2003 09:48 PM (jtW2s)
10
They've cleaned it up now, but it still includes "Pieman (Global Pastry Uprising)". Mmm... pastry uprising.
Posted by: Rob at Wednesday, September 10 2003 05:08 AM (ISznP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Saturday, September 06
Oops
Note to self: If you are setting up a mail server, and using it to receive twice-daily backups of your website, and then you decide not to retrieve those backups from the mail server so that they just lie around, your spool partition will fill up and
you will stop receiving mail!
So if anyone had anything important to say to me in the last few hours, please say it again, 'cause it might have got losted.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:35 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 79 words, total size 1 kb.
1
How small is your spool partition? It's either tiny or your web backups are huge. If so, don't backup everything each time. Just grab the comments since that's the only thing that should be changing.
If you're using Exim, it would be very easy to directly archive the email upon receipt. If you don't actually look at this stuff all the time, this would be the simple solution. Just create an email account specifically for this purpose and add a router that archives the email to a different partition (I can show you how, if you wish).
If you're using Microsoft Exchange, you deserve whatever problems you get.
Posted by: Rossz at Sunday, September 07 2003 05:19 PM (43SjN)
2
My spool partition is only 500MB. The backups are about 15MB per day. The web site is about 1GB :)
I'm using Postfix, by the way. I just made a spool directory on a bigger partition and symlinked it back to /var/spool/mail and everything's happy again.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, September 07 2003 11:13 PM (jtW2s)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Everything Old is New Again
There's a new Heinlein book coming out. Yes, Robert A. Heinlein. And yes, it's
by Heinlein, not
about Heinlein.
It's called For Us, the Living, and it was lost more than 60 years ago:
"For Us, the Living," was put aside, and eventually lost. The Heinleins apparently destroyed all copies they had. And because at the time it was written Heinlein was not a member of the science fiction community, no other sf writers knew about it. He had let one or two friends read it, and it is by a long trail through one of them that this rarest of treasures was located.
Is it any good? It's Heinlein's earliest work, predating
Lifeline, but then
Lifeline was already a damn good story. The half dozen
lucky bastards people who have read it say that
yes, it is good, though clearly a first novel.
So, who else has a long-forgotten novel hidden away? A few years ago a lost work by Fritz Leiber, The Dealings of Daniel Kesserich, was rediscovered and published. Tolkien's unpublished story Roverandom likewise languished for decades before reaching the public.
If you asked me to name the three authors I'd most like to see have a lost work rediscovered, those would be high - very high - on the list. Sometimes things do work out the way they should.
(via Slashdot)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
03:11 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 233 words, total size 2 kb.
1
too cool. any word on when?
Posted by: Ted at Saturday, September 06 2003 08:30 PM (2sKfR)
2
Looks like the end of November. Just in time for Christmas!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Saturday, September 06 2003 10:18 PM (jtW2s)
3
Excellent!
Wow, that's really amazing. Just...wow.
Posted by: Victor at Sunday, September 07 2003 11:59 AM (FNHVL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Patriette
I haven't done a Blog of the Day for a while (in fact, due to pressures at work I haven't blogged much at all in the past few weeks) but I was checking my inbound links tonight and I tripped over
The Patriette. (It was dark.)
One can't help but admire a blogger who titles a post "Oh bother! I seem to be stuck in an Argentine prison!" (or for that matter, "Things I Hate: France"). She even has me blogrolled - uh, which is how I found her. Albeit she has me blogrolled as "Alas! Alack! Oh, no!", but that's better than not being blogrolled, right?
Right?
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:38 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 112 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Susie at Saturday, September 06 2003 10:44 AM (UA6yw)
2
Yes, good choice. Although I rather enjoyed that top spot under "blog of the day" for the last few months. :-)
Posted by: Jennifer at Saturday, September 06 2003 12:17 PM (E9paH)
3
She has me as "Semi-evil misguided minion who we all hope will see the light."
I'm pretty sure I've seen that somewhere else before. . .hmmm. . .
Posted by: victor at Saturday, September 06 2003 12:29 PM (7rb2M)
4
Sorry about tripping you like that. (You should turn on some more lights around those inbound links. Heh heh heh.)
Thanks for noticing me. I am honored to be blog of the day. To show my appreciation, I will add a second link to my blogroll for your blog with its official name.
Thank you kindly and all the best!
Posted by: The Patriette at Saturday, September 06 2003 12:41 PM (b+r6j)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Friday, September 05
Thursday, September 04
Annika and Arnold
annika of
annika's journal and poetry has a first rate post explaining:
why i begrudgingly, reluctantly, give my enthusiastic endorsement to Arnold Schwarzenegger for California governor.
Read it
here, assuming Blogspot's permalinks work for a change.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
11:51 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I linked to that post, too! Great minds and all that...
Posted by: Susie at Thursday, September 04 2003 12:12 PM (UA6yw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wednesday, September 03
Gnat in 2044
Jennifer, when you finish with all the presidents, vice-presidents, and first ladies past,
here's something for you to work on:
Natalie Lileks was the bravest, toughest Chief Executive this nation ever had! She did what she had to do, and she paid the political price! Paid it gladly! I still remember the day she resigned...as far as I'm concerned there was NO disgrace in her decision!
(
Silent Running via
LFG)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
11:35 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.
1
When I run out of tales of the past start telling tales of the future?
Posted by: Jennifer at Wednesday, September 03 2003 12:14 PM (rZmE1)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, September 03 2003 12:32 PM (jtW2s)
3
I loved this post, and just linked to it myself. I linked via the trackback site, but no trackback appeared. Might you know why?
Posted by: Howard at Wednesday, September 03 2003 03:18 PM (3pfkH)
4
Well, the trackback is there now :)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, September 03 2003 10:27 PM (LBXBY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Tuesday, September 02
CSS Clueless
Steven Den Beste has lately been wrestling with both
CSS (Cascading Stylesheets) and
a new version of City Desk (his blogging software) that helpfully rewrites your HTML for you - and indeed, can't be prevented from doing so.
Being an engineer, he discusses City Desk in the context of intrusive tools. An intrusive tool is one that you are constantly aware of using. Notepad, for example, is not an intrusive tool; it sits there and you type stuff into it. Word is very much an intrusive tool, with its pop-up advice and its real-time spelling-error-generator and its fourth-grade reading-level grammarbot. I hate Word; I use Lotus WordPro for any serious writing (my book, for example) because it's not intrusive; despite having just as many bells and whistles as Word, it does exactly what you tell it to and shuts up otherwise.
I find CSS to be an intrusive tool too, not because it beeps and squawks at you (it can't), but because as soon as you try to do anything complicated, it stops working the way it should. Setting up the three-column layout was a huge pain with Internet Explorer; I tried three different ways of doing it - all of which worked fine in Mozilla - before stumbling across something that IE accepted. I don't know if the fault is with the specification or Mozilla or IE, but CSS is clearly not ready for use when it takes trial and error, and in the end, arcane trickery, to make something that really is fairly simple, work. And I ended up with two different stylesheets anyway, and JavaScript code to select the (hopefully) right one based on what browser you are using. (Try looking at the site in both Mozilla and IE - the IE stylesheet is different because I can't be bothered keeping both versions up to date.)
For the new layout I'm considering using tables instead. HTML purists will tell you that using tables for layout is a heinous crime, but I say to the purists: Go piss up a rope.* Tables do what you tell them to, where CSS does whatever the hell it feels like. I get enough of that from people; I don't feel like dealing with it in software as well.
* Where does this expression come from, anyway?**
** Never mind, I googled.***
*** Okay, okay: GO PISS UP A ROPE by 1940s: Go away and do something characteristically stupid; ="get lost", "go fly a kite". "He asked for another contribution and I told him to go piss up a rope." (Chapman’s Dictionary of American Slang)****
**** I also found an ad for "Urine Porn". Some days you're torn between "To each his own" and "Ewwww".*****
***** I'm finished now, Tiger, you can have them back.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:28 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 467 words, total size 3 kb.
1
How is this a problem with CSS and not with IE? They way I understand it, Gecko/Mozilla are fully compliant with CSS and the new standards, while IE is sort of hackish.
Posted by: Chris C. at Thursday, September 04 2003 09:17 AM (do/71)
2
Simple: You can't just use CSS, because it's just a spec and doesn't
do anything. You have to use it as it's implemented in browsers. And given that most people use IE, that means that CSS is mostly broken.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, September 04 2003 09:36 AM (jtW2s)
3
This is something of a semantic argument, but that means IE is broken, not CSS. That is, when browsers interpret CSS correctly, it does what it's supposed to. I realize that functionally, there's no difference, but the problem isn't in the CSS spec.
Posted by: Chris C. at Thursday, September 04 2003 11:48 AM (do/71)
4
What I'm getting at is that a browser/html engine that implements the CSS spec correctly (ie, Mozilla/Gecko, at least by their claim), everything works fine when you try to do something with CSS. The fact that an incorrect interpretation of CSS (ie, in IE) breaks doesn't make the spec any less
valid. Less useful, perhaps, but not less
valid and further, it doesn't mean that the spec itself isn't ready for deployment. I can write a C compiler that breaks when it reads valid ANSI C code. Does that mean ANSI C isn't ready to be deployed? For that matter, iirc, Visual C++/Visual Studio doesn't handle GNU C++ or ANSI C++ correctly in some instances. Does that mean neither of those specs is ready to be deployed?
Posted by: Chris C. at Thursday, September 04 2003 11:58 AM (do/71)
5
That's a fair comment. I found that in Mozilla, the obvious implementation or a layout generally worked; in IE, it generally was completely screwed up.
I don't particularly
like the CSS spec (actually, I think CSS is horrid), but I think you're right that that is not where the main problem lies.
But if 90% of your audience uses non-ANSI-compliant C compilers that break on your code, ANSI C is not ready for use. Ready for
implementation, yes, but not for use. And that's where we are with CSS right now. Happy day if I could get everyone in the world to switch to Mozilla...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, September 04 2003 12:30 PM (jtW2s)
6
Yeah, I actually misspoke (mistyped?). I meant that it was ready for implementation, that it could be used and that the spec worked. It isn't ready for deployment because the major browser doesn't implement it correctly.
That said, why don't you like CSS. I'm by no means well versed, but what I've seen of the theory (divorcing formatting from content) and some of the demos for Mozilla, it seems useful.
Posted by: Chris C. at Thursday, September 04 2003 12:38 PM (do/71)
7
The idea is excellent, and the things that can be achieved with it in a working implementation can be both useful and very cool.
Probably "horrid" was too strong... I still have scars from my battle with IE a couple of months back. That and the spec, which is less detailed than it could be when you get into the more advanced layout functions - which made it hard to tell whether my stylesheet was at fault or IE's implementation.
I don't particularly like the actual CSS language at the moment, but I'll probably get used to it...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, September 04 2003 12:47 PM (jtW2s)
8
If you take Internet Exploder® out of the equation and design your web pages for browsers that stick to the accepted stards (e.g.
Mozilla), CSS is great. It's when you have to try every sneaky little obscure trick you can think of to get IE to render a page half-assed legible that CSS is such a chore.
Posted by: Rossz at Friday, September 05 2003 09:17 PM (43SjN)
9
You're both probably right. As soon as the wounds heal, I'll give CSS another try.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, September 05 2003 10:52 PM (LBXBY)
10
Say I have two tools for making chairs. With one of the tools, the chair will collapse when some people sit in it. Which tool should I use to make a chair? There's no point in making a fancy chair that doesn't work.
Posted by: Tony at Sunday, September 07 2003 05:50 PM (CUi1V)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
81kb generated in CPU 0.031, elapsed 0.3341 seconds.
60 queries taking 0.3148 seconds, 422 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.