Wednesday, August 13
2.91 > 3
It's a good thing that Winamp didn't stop working on Winamp 2 when they released Winamp 3. It's not that 3 is bad, it's just that 2 is better. In almost every way.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
It's a good thing that Winamp didn't stop working on Winamp 2 when they released Winamp 3. It's not that 3 is bad, it's just that 2 is better. In almost every way.
There's a reason it's been downloaded 273,375,923 times (when I last checked).
And now it plays videos. And because it allows me to easily set it to realtime priority, it doesn't suffer when I'm running things in the background. Which is good, because I'm always running things in the background. The alternative would be a dual-processor machine for Windows, but that would require some of that money stuff I've heard about...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
12:32 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I am stunned commentless by the beauty and eloquence of your prose......(especially since I didn't understand most of it ;)
Posted by: Susie at Wednesday, August 13 2003 09:04 PM (Avj/J)
2
Exactly why do you think 2 is so much better than Winamp 3? I upgraded to Winamp 3 as soon as it came out and haven't ever looked back. Its been great!
Posted by: Matt Olken at Friday, August 15 2003 05:44 PM (/hPh6)
45kb generated in CPU 0.0664, elapsed 0.1782 seconds.
56 queries taking 0.164 seconds, 340 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
56 queries taking 0.164 seconds, 340 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
