1 Sadly, I think it's pretty clear she's being completely serious.

2 It's Poe's Law all the way down:

Nobody has the right to take away rights from others. Nobody has the freedom to take away freedoms from others.

Anyone guilty of hate speech – which should carry criminal penalties of 25 years to life – should be sent to special prisons designed to re-educate them and to instill values of tolerance, freedom, democracy, and human rights in them.

How can that not be satire?

3 The key to satire is that you -stop-, and if someone goes "I think this might possibly be satire," you respond with "indeed, how could it be anything else?" If someone says, "This is ridiculous and you are an idiot for advocating it," you respond with "it's satire, how could anyone possibly actually think these things?"

You don't go onto Twitter to defend your satire. (I say "defend", but there's not a lot of actual conversation going on there; "restate the points of the article as people yell at me for being a twit" is probably more correct. Twitter sucks as a venue for this kind of conversation.)

That doesn't mean it's honest, but if it is not, at this point it is not humor or wit, but just plain trolling.

4 It's a new art form.  I call it Found Satire.  It's when someone presents an argument so ill-considered, so deeply irrational and disturbing, that it becomes a compelling case for the diametrically opposing position.

5 So, Juxtaposing this against recent events.  Did the fluffyhead who thinks she can legislate people out of badthinking propose punishments for Badthink? And did those punishments look anything like what happened in the offices of Charlie Hebdo, or just like the fellow in Saudi Arabia who is getting 1000 lashes?

I mean, if she's really serious about this....

6 Yup, 25 to life in re-education camp for Badthought.

I'm still pretty convinced it's satire; after declaring her undying support for freedom of speech she provides twenty numbered and increasingly deranged paragraphs of things she'd outlaw, climaxing with:

20. Speech which is found to be irresponsible, unethical, antisocial, hurtful, impolite, uncivil, abusive, distasteful, and/or unacceptable in general.