1 The pound mistake everyone makes (unless they edit strictly through a provider tool).

1 Pro tip: probably shouldn't have the alarm on the server that went down.

1 Well, at least you didn't deadname anyone.

1 I'm not sure what death would accomplish, weblog-wise, that wouldn't be at least equivalent to server problems.  But then, your TLD is .nu which is close enough to Mu, which is basically an older version of Atlantis, so you're probably immortal and joking about dying here.
*crosses fingers, eats a clove of garlic, and shaves off his eyebrows for good luck*

2 Best of luck, Pixy.

1 About your title/name text. 
I thought is said "Who cancels the canceller?".
But I looked it up on Goggle Translate and it says "Who is cancelled, the chancellor."
I haven't taken Latin in 30 years...but I don't think Google is right. 

2 In classical Latin it would mean "Who lattices the latticeworkers?" because the word cancel as we know it is a much later construction taken from the physical act of crossing out text, where the lines take the form of a lattice, and the Latin term for a lattice was cancellus.  Which in turn was taken from the word carcer for prison because prison bars are in that shape.

I personally translate it as Who will cancel the cancelmen?


(I looked all that up when I decided to use it as a Twitter name.)

3 Yeah, don't take Google translate seriously on Latin.

There was a program called Words which was pretty good about telling you the grammar for the endings of Latin words entered, if they were in the included dictionary.  But the author died, the website to download it got taken down, and I'm not sure if any of the website interfaces is still around. 

I actually don't remember what the -are grammar could mean, even though that was very early in my lessons.  -ares was beyond anything I learned, I think.

4 "Criticising people for siding people with terrorists"
Hands up, everyone who's suprised robots and/or the troglodyte woke "programmers" at Twitter don't understand sarcasm (possibly depending on who's being sarcastic).

1 I like the part where he invents Two Americas out of thin air: "convict and don't pardon" versus "pardon and don't convict". I'll bet he felt so clever that he stared at that sentence for at least five minutes before pulling his hand out of his pants.

-j

2 a) I am fundamentally opposed to the rest of the world.  If the rest of the world was willing to wage war in an attempt to create world government, I would cheerfully do my best to burn it all down.

b) I am reminded of the reasoning behind the distinction between the South African Bureau of State Security, and its replacement, the Department of National Security.  National security is the people.  State security is the likes of congress or Trump. 

c) In my opinion, the controlling legal precedent is volume four of the collected works of Lincoln.  Violent combination too great to be resolved by the ordinary proceedings of court.  Trump is still president, and could legitimately call the militia to restore enforcement of law at anytime following the Georgia run off proof. 

d) This is clearly a commie regime cheating its way into power, to be followed by mass murder.

e) This isn't Nixon-Ford.  Pardons will do nothing to keep Trump or his family alive.

f)  Charitably, the Democrats are desperate, and determined to push things.  DC situation smells.  If he isn't in on it, as someone with a career in making political comments, and without enough prep to go find a new career, he is probably nuts from the stress and confusion.

g) The problems are more complex than is understood by the people who are suddenly discovering that something urgently needs to be done.  They don't understand it well enough for a carefully designed simple solution, if any simple solution would work. 

h) What we have is a breakdown in trust and consensus, with cracks that have been growing for a long time.  Hitting it with a hammer makes the cracks grow more.  The reason war will occur is that Biden and Harris don't have the temperaments to do anything but hit it with a hammer.  Bret's hammer is also a hammer.  Situation is not going to be restored to prior the lockdown hammerblow, or the most recent BLM hammerblows.  If a new stability occurs, it is going to be by a different mechanism than these grand hammerblows.

i) It is afraid. 

3 I am reluctantly coming to the opinion that the protesters who hounded Weinstein out of Evergreen College may have had a point.

1 @jack "this" Oh, you darling retards and your untargeted relative pronouns.  I hope Trump causes y'all to hang out in a closet with your 41% friends.