This accidentally fell out of her pocket when I bumped into her. Took me four goes.
Monday, February 13
Geekometer
Instant geek test:
Z80000.pdf
Your response:
1. Huh?
2. Should I download that or something?
3. Don't you have an extra zero in there?
4. Right-click Save As!!!
5. I already have that, thanks.
6. I suppose it's more convenient than the paper version.
7. There's an error on page 310; the instruction coding doesn't match my chip.
Results below.
more...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:22 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
1
umm, i knew it was for a Zilog chip from the name before i #4'd it. Does that count?
:-D
Posted by: tommy at Monday, February 13 2006 09:58 PM (EhwJT)
2
I answered #1. Will you still be my friend? ;)
Posted by: Susie at Monday, February 13 2006 11:43 PM (a0oF7)
3
A little geeky. One of the joys of having worked at RadioShack for a couple of years.
Posted by: Wonderduck at Tuesday, February 14 2006 01:44 AM (zBXYv)
4
That takes me back. Remember when Zilog and National Semiconductor were still competing in the high performance microprocessor marketplace? It's a damned shame that National's 32032 never went anywhere;
there was a sweet chip.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Tuesday, February 14 2006 07:29 PM (pqiW9)
5
Zilog's still hanging in there in the embedded market, I like the Z8, but they really blew things in the high performance microprocessor marketplace. If they'd actually produced the Z800 when they published the instruction set, instead of years later as the Z8150 (usually bought as the Hitachi equivalent) they might now be where Intel is.
As for DTACK GROUNDED, most of the folks in the crowd I was on the fringe of (along with M. Simon who now blogs at Power & Control) thought that running a 68000 in synchronous mode was a throwback to the middle ages.
Posted by: triticale at Saturday, March 11 2006 04:18 PM (hwF/A)
6
When I saw it I instantly thought of the Z80 chip used in older computers and video game systems.
Posted by: LC CanForce 101 at Saturday, March 18 2006 01:21 AM (3smJS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Sunday, February 12
First Time
Not the controller.
The controller (a Highpoint Rocketraid 1640) was just being its usual persnickety self. One of the disks (Seagate Barracuda 200GB SATA) was on its way out, and failing intermittently. The Rocketraid controllers will detect the failure and then complain incessently about it, even if the disk comes back on line after a moment.
I know this, because it just stopped being intermittent. But not until after I'd finished backing everything up.
First time that's ever happened to me.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
06:29 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 85 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think you just violated Murphy's Law.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Monday, February 13 2006 01:43 AM (pqiW9)
2
Heh, reminds me of the one post-backup failure I ever had.
My company gave me an old laptop with 64MB of RAM onto which someone had foolishly installed Windows 2000, which had just come out at the time. The hard drive literally
never stopped swapping, because it was trying to run this gigantic buggy operating system out of virtual memory. As you can imagine, it didn't last long.
After a couple months of crashing semiweekly, it began making odd noises in addition to its usual excruciating slowness, so I started saving my code off onto floppies.
A couple hours after I finished, Windows locked up for the third time that day, losing me about half an hour of work. I was so enraged I pounded my fists on the casing, causing it to emit a small whine and a beep, and the laptop never booted up again.
I have no regrets (hey, I had backups).
Posted by: TallDave at Monday, February 13 2006 05:35 PM (H8Wgl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
There Oughta Be A Law
Pixy's Law of Duplicity
If the problem resists all your attempts at isolation, consider that you may have two problems.
Pixy's Law of Maintenance
If all logical methods of repair have failed to solve the problem, find two interchangeable parts and interchange them.
Pixy's Law of Human/Computer Interaction
You can press escape all you like, but it won't do anything if the keyboard's not plugged in.
Pixy's Law of Customisation
If you work with computers long enough, sooner or later you will find yourself adjusting a delicate and expensive piece of equipment with a pair of wire cutters.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
07:52 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 108 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"Pixy's Law of Customisation
If you work with computers long enough, sooner or later you will find yourself adjusting a delicate and expensive piece of equipment with a pair of wire cutters."
Yep
Posted by: Kathy K at Sunday, February 12 2006 12:03 PM (Si0rb)
2
LOL!!! You are a great philosopher, my friend.
Posted by: Susie at Sunday, February 12 2006 01:29 PM (a0oF7)
Posted by: Susie at Sunday, February 12 2006 01:36 PM (a0oF7)
4
Actually, working on one of the computers at school, we used laws one and two. Fixed the problem.
I was about to use law 4 as well. It got off lucky.
:-D
Posted by: tommy at Sunday, February 12 2006 02:25 PM (7K8KE)
5
Owlish's Corollary of Human/Computer Interaction
If a particular piece of electronics isn't working, make sure it's plugged into everything else.
I can think of at least 3 times this became useful.
Posted by: owlish at Tuesday, February 14 2006 12:11 AM (ueWi5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Saturday, February 11
Pixy Misa in the Library
With an axe.
It's the RAID controller.
I just got the RAID array to fail without taking out the computer. The disks are good - I can use them for up to half an hour before the problem crops up. The computer is fine - it kept right on running on the boot drive (and the 300GB external drive I borrowed from work for the weekend). The data is fine. The RAID controller is, in a word, stuffed.
Which is, under the circumstances, the best possible outcome. I can replace that for $60, and then I'll be free of the blasted thing. Now I just need to finish my backups... In thirty-minute installments.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:53 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 123 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Good old percussive maintenance--Dwarf Style!
Posted by: Susie at Sunday, February 12 2006 01:39 PM (a0oF7)
2
(ellipses still seem to be blacklisted)
Posted by: Susie at Sunday, February 12 2006 01:40 PM (a0oF7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Friday, February 10
Joy
I plugged in my Windows box for the first time since I moved house (nearly two months ago). Of course, I have a second Windows box these days, my notebook, so I haven't been Windows-free all that time.
A couple of hours later I tried to check something on the shared drive and it didn't want to play. So I went into the living computer room and there was this beeping noise. I didn't even know the computer had a beeper; I never bother to connect the speaker up. It must be mounted on the motherboard.
A quick reboot and it's decided that it does have a one-terabyte RAID array after all. It's also managed to discover its video card this time around.
Meh. Linux can be a pain to get working (handy hint: when building a new Linux box, never use a video card less than two years old), but once it's working, it stays working.
Update: Gone again. Blah.
Update: It's not a disk failure. It's just weapons-grade flakiness. After about a dozen reboots - the majority of which failed in one way or another - I'm now logged in as administrator and it's running perfectly. It's not just working, it's working better than it ever worked before. The RAID array, which was always mysteriously slow, is now lightning fast. Very very strange.
Update: And - dead again.
I think I have everything backed up. This weekend I check, double-check, triple-check, and then that RAID array is toast.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:35 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 252 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Don't you just love it when absolutely nothing works to spec?
Posted by: Jojo at Saturday, February 11 2006 05:12 AM (fd2de)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
There Is Probably Someone Out There
Who can use this information, so here it is.
If you were developing a Neverwinter Nights module, and then your computer violently exploded because, for example, you were running Windows ME with 768MB of memory, and then you installed Neverwinter Nights on your new computer and discovered to your delight that you had a recent backup of your work and then discovered to your dismay that when you try to load it into the NWN toolset it comes up with the error "The specified file could not be found", it's probably just because you installed NWN in a different directory and somewhere it's hardcoded the filepath and refuses to read the file even though the file is right there dammit and in fact the only reason it can't read the file is because it just did read the file, then the solution is ModPacker.
Use ModUnpacker to unpack your module; use ModPacker to pack it again; drop the resulting module back in your modules directory; and it will work.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:23 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 181 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Procrastination.....naaa not me. Just figured out that *this* was your home on the net....The blog name rung a bell....but the buddists must be right...if a bell rings in a vacume (my head) it sure don't make a sound.
Anyhow, are you still involved in NWN modding? Or spend anytime over there? Just curious as my better half and I used to frequent a couple of the social mods. She loves POA. Now I am addicted to the mmorps (mostly from Korea)...at least until NWN2 finally makes it's way to the shelves.
Posted by: GuyS. at Thursday, February 16 2006 02:08 PM (oyWHq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thursday, February 09
Thought For The Day
An ounce of undo is equal to a pound of "Are you sure?"
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:30 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
Windows (Net) Working
There is an answer.
The secret is that my notebook has not three, but four network connections. (Not counting the modem.) Ethernet, WiFi, Wireless Broadband - and FireWire. And FireWire does not get disconnected when it gets, uh, disconnected.
Given this, the solution is obvious. Simply bridge the ethernet, WiFi, and FireWire ports. VMWare will then automatically bridge to the bridge, and all your computers, virtual and otherwise, will be able to talk just they way they would if Windows wasn't getting in the way in the first place.
Oh.
Except for the part where your wireless network no longer works. So you can either have your computer able to talk to itself, or you can have it able to talk to the rest of the world. Okay, so all you need to do is take WiFi out of the bridge and then disable the bridge.
Hmm.
If I got WiFi at work, that would work all the time. I think. Must seek cheap WiFi access points...
Update: Or I can just toggle the bridge on and off. Off when I'm on WiFi, on when I'm on ethernet or mobile. Wups. That doesn't work either. Oh, yeah, they have to have the same IP address. Tweak tweak... Shut up, Windows, I know what I'm doing. Ah. Good. Nope. Now I don't have internet access. What if I disable FireWire as well? Right, now it works. Windows, you suck.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
04:53 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 244 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Pixy,
There is another solution, install the Microsoft Loopback Adapter.
You add it through the Add Hardwar wizard, skip through the auto search functions and get to the manual selection part, choose Network Adapter, Microsoft, Lookback Adapter.
It will be assigned an address from the AutoIP pool 169.254.0.0/16 and will always be connected even if all other networks are disconnected.
I've had to use this is the past to get Progress databases to run client/server mode.
Kean
Posted by: Kean at Sunday, February 12 2006 09:28 AM (Z/aWn)
2
Thanks Kean.
Unfortunately, VMWare doesn't seem to recognise it, so I still have to bridge it with the ethernet port to get a connection.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, February 13 2006 02:27 AM (BjRBA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wednesday, February 08
Dependencies
I decided to install Kdevelop on Amelix, because I'm planning to use Amelix for developing M*nx and I've heard good things about Kdevelop. So I went into the software manager and told it to download Kdevelop, which is only a 30MB package. No problem.
Except that to install Kdevelop I need to install 550MB of other packages and libraries first. When I already have a 2.8GB install, including the full GCC compiler suite. It does this all for me automatically, but still...
I ended up having to move the whole of /opt onto my new 20GB drive, because I was almost out of space on /.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:01 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 108 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Any particular reason for using SUSE ?
Granted Fedora is pretty bloated.
Posted by: Andrew at Thursday, February 09 2006 12:02 AM (RWEVY)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, February 09 2006 01:26 AM (RbYVY)
3
Pixy, do this:
1. Create a virtual disk using QEMU
2. Mount it as ide0.0 in VMware Player VMX file.
3. Mount CD as cdrom-raw
4. Put Fedora Core 4 Disk 1 in the CD drive
5. Boot VMware Player pointed at your custom VMX file
6. Install FC4
If you prefer Slackware, Debian, Ubuntu, etc. substitute your distro of choice for FC4 Disk 1.
7. Follow install instructions.
8. Lather, rinse, repeat until happy
Posted by: Eric at Thursday, February 09 2006 02:17 AM (Tikk+)
4
I'm actually finding SUSE quite good, but I will do this, now that I have cleared off a few gig of disk space. I'll probably set up a Centos 4.2 system, since that's what munu runs.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, February 09 2006 06:50 AM (AZRXO)
5
I'm reasonably impressed by the openSuSE 10.0.
Posted by: Eric at Friday, February 10 2006 01:12 AM (Tikk+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Instant Disk Space
The other problem I had was that the SUSE installation I'm using (available
here, more Linux installs
here) only had 4GB of disk. 400MB is allocated to swap, leaving 3.6GB for files. A full Linux installation these days uses up... more than 4GB.
A slight problem, and the main reason why I really really needed to have the networking working. But then I decided to try renaming the virtual machine, because it was called "KDE_3.5_on_SUSE_Linux_10", which is a bit of a mouthful. I renamed it to Amelix, because its Linux running on Amelia (the name of my notebook).
Only it didn't work, because it was looking for the old file name. So I took a look at the config file, and lo! It is text. And I could change the name of the file therein, it it did work.
And what's more, it defined the virtual disk as SCSI drive 0:0. So I wondered, what would happen if I cloned the virtual disk file, and edited the config to point SCSI drive 0:1 at the new virtual disk.
The answer: It works. So I can add as many 4GB disks as I want... Until I run out of real disk, anyway.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
01:17 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 207 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What's even cooler, if you download QEMU for Windows, is that you can create empty virtual disks. Then you can create an additional SCSI disk in the VMX file. Now fdisk and format it. Now you have a brand new disk of whatever size you want it to be. Try it out, it's fun!
Posted by: Eric at Wednesday, February 08 2006 02:24 AM (Tikk+)
2
Hey, it works!
Now I have a 20GB disk. But it's virtual IDE instead of virtual SCSI. :p
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, February 08 2006 04:00 AM (RbYVY)
3
So your notebook is named "Amelia". Is there a computer named "Lina" yet?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Wednesday, February 08 2006 02:13 PM (pqiW9)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, February 08 2006 05:00 PM (75UPs)
5
No, no, no. The other one should have been Sylpheel. (And I wonder how many people are picking up on the reference.)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Wednesday, February 08 2006 10:24 PM (pqiW9)
6
You know that Naga and Amelia are sisters, right?
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, February 08 2006 11:55 PM (RbYVY)
7
No, I wasn't aware of that. I haven't watched the movies, since I've been informed they're nothing like as good as the TV series's are. And I didn't actually like either of the two TV series I bought all that much, either. They were OK, I guess, but not what I would consider top drawer. Besides which, it's Amelia and Zelgadis who really make the series for me (to the extent that anything does), and they're not in the movies where Naga appears.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Thursday, February 09 2006 12:16 AM (pqiW9)
8
And I had the impression that Naga more resembled Martina than Amelia in terms of temperment -- and I really hated Martina.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Thursday, February 09 2006 12:20 AM (pqiW9)
9
No-one likes Martina. :(
The first movie is well worth watching. And it gives an insight into why Lina put up with Naga rather than just char-broiling her and going off on her own.
I don't think we are ever told directly that Naga and Amelia are sisters. But we are told that Amelia has a big sister who left home and who she hasn't seen in years. And we also find out that Naga's real name is Gracia Ul Naga Seyruun - meaning that she's a princess of the royal family of Seyruun, just like Amelia.
Hmm. Apparently it is
all explained in the books.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, February 09 2006 01:33 AM (RbYVY)
10
Pixy: "Hey, it works!
Now I have a 20GB disk. But it's virtual IDE instead of virtual SCSI. :p"
Cool! Have fun with virtual disk stuff. I'm going to play around with QEMU on Windows, see if it works as well as VMware.
Posted by: Eric at Thursday, February 09 2006 02:13 AM (Tikk+)
11
Oh, and there are at least two occasions when Naga and Amelia appear in the same scene - but they don't see each other either time.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, February 09 2006 06:53 AM (AZRXO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
75kb generated in CPU 0.0216, elapsed 0.1544 seconds.
59 queries taking 0.1394 seconds, 388 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.