CAN I BE OF ASSISTANCE?
Friday, January 14
What's That, Lassie?
Timmy's destroyed the Solar System again?When comets collide with small asteroids or spacecraft, they can breakup into smaller comets and sungrazer comets as shown in the picture of the Comet 57P/du Toit-Neujmin-Delporte. The fragments are spread over millions of kilometers.
On July 4, 2005. NASA plans to collide a 370 kilogram spacecraft into the Comet 9P/Tempel 1. The ensuing 16,000-megaton explosion will shatter the 140 billion antimatter metric ton comet into trillions of pieces. Based upon to my computer model, the antimatter fragments are going to collide with Mars, Earth and Sun in the subsequent years.
In 2110, metric ton antimatter fragments will start colliding with the Earth and producing 10, 000 megaton explosions. As trillions of fragments continue to migrate toward the Sun during the 22nd millennium, thousands of 10 to 10,000 megaton explosions will devastate Earth’s environment. Humanity will be brought to the brink of extinction.
This would, you understand, be bad.
Over the centuries, trillions of fragments will drift toward the Sun. When the antimatter fragments, called sungrazer, collide with the sun, multi-billion megaton explosions produce enormous sunspots and solar flares stretching millions of kilometers into space.
I have written NASA Office of Space Science and had discussions with NASA’s personnel. They have a general understand; but unfortunately, they don’t comprehend a 16,000-megaton explosion with a comet. I have request NASA cancel the Deep Impact launch scheduled for December 30, 2004.
Dear Crazy Person,
We at NASA appreciate your interest in this matter. Please keep us informed of any further research you may be attempting into this or other related subjects.
Regards,
Dr Hertz Lottly
NASA Office of Staff Morale
(Hat tip: Cecil on Skeptical Community)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
12:07 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 282 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Funnily enough, 10,000 megatons is close to the correct figure for a ton of antimatter annihilating with a ton of matter. I get 40,000 megatons on the back of this envelope, which considering the scale involved is not much of a difference.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, January 14 2005 07:02 AM (+S1Ft)
2
22nd millennium?
So we've got 20,000 years then?
Yeah, I can see why NASA doesn't want to talk to this guy.
Posted by: JP Gibb at Friday, January 14 2005 09:08 AM (aNKFx)
3
This is quite unimportant compared to the threat posed to Earth by the Nike Corporation. By my calculations, if Nike produces just 10% more shoes this year, they will pass the Shoe Event Horizon and civilization will come to an end. The few remaining people will curse the ground and evolve the power of flight.
I have warned them repeatedly and requested they stop producing shoes, but their corporate greed has apparently destroyed their ability to reason.
Posted by: TallDave at Friday, January 14 2005 11:20 AM (lZMuK)
4
Good heavens... I haven't seen "Shoe Event Horizon" used in casual (or even formal!) conversation in a stoat's years.
Woo. Yay.
Posted by: Wonderduck at Friday, January 14 2005 10:03 PM (VZBSf)
5
Do you think that McDonalds could somehow harness this exciting new energy source? Burger King brags about "flame broiled", but I can see the new McD slogan: "the only burger that (anti) matters".
Posted by: Ted at Saturday, January 15 2005 07:21 AM (blNMI)
6
Wonderduck,
I have good news for you:
www.hitchhikermovie.com
Posted by: TallDave at Saturday, January 15 2005 05:48 PM (lZMuK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Saturday, January 01
Happy New Year (Offer Void Where Not Applicable)
For all my readers who adhere to the Gregorian calendar, happy new year!
And for everyone else, yes, that's what all the noise is about.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
01:30 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
Tuesday, December 28
Year of Democracy
It's been an amazing year for elections. Australia, America, Indonesia, Afghanistan, and now Ukraine. Okay, so the elections in Spain didn't go the way I'd like, but they were free and basically fair. (And considering that Spain was a military dictatorship as recently as 1975, that's of no small import.)
I'll leave my borders orange for now, in honor of Viktor Yushchenko and the people of Ukraine.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
05:44 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And there's nothing the bloomy Democrats can do to stop it!
And freedom goes marching on...
Posted by: Chase at Wednesday, December 29 2004 02:29 AM (9rsKp)
2
Freedom is not just marching, but actually stomping its enemies into the dirt.
Posted by: TallDave at Wednesday, December 29 2004 05:22 PM (M0J/c)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Saturday, December 25
Merry Christmas
To all the Munuvians, to my many friends throughout the blogosphere and the broader internet, to my readers and family and friends, Merry Christmas!
I have a big bag of chocolate-coated macadamias here. Anyone interested?
(These are from the same company that makes abalone-flavoured, and indeed wasabi-flavoured, macadamias. I hope like hell that they clean the machinery between batches...)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:02 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Merry Christmas to you, too!
Posted by: Gir at Saturday, December 25 2004 05:02 PM (yffrg)
2
Your comments don't remember me! I am sad now....
Merry Christmas, Dearest Overlord and Smiter of All Template Racoons!
(Ok, I really am Susie)
Posted by: not Susie, no way at Sunday, December 26 2004 11:19 AM (s+NPR)
Posted by: Chase at Sunday, December 26 2004 02:10 PM (Nyk5T)
4
May your Christmas be merry, even if flavoured with traces of abalone wasbi.
Posted by: Evil Pundit at Monday, December 27 2004 03:08 AM (ss0/1)
5
Merry belated Christmas Pixy ... Here's to 2005!!!
Posted by: Rob at Wednesday, December 29 2004 07:59 PM (hhqTZ)
6
What a coincidence, I ate like 20 of those today. Co-worker brought them back from Hawaii. They are highly addictive.
Didn't taste any wasabi on them. But then, I wasn't really looking for it. I should probably get another box and do better research...
Posted by: TallDave at Wednesday, December 29 2004 09:29 PM (SAIdQ)
7
Merry Xmas and I'll pass on the macadamias thanks.
Posted by: Ozguru at Thursday, December 30 2004 02:24 AM (AJL/m)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Latitude and Lightitude
I was thinking about
James Lileks and
Michele Catalano's posts about Christmas lights and the difference between coloured-lighters and white-lighters, and reflecting that around here (Sydney) people don't really go in for Christmas lights very much.
And then I thought to myself: Duh!
Mr Lileks lives in Minneapolis. This time of year, the sun rises at 7:50 am and sets at 4:36 pm (#). That's less than 9 hours of daylight. Plenty of dark time for everyone to see your handiwork.
In Sydney today the sun rose at 5:42 am and set at 8:07 pm (#). Not a reverse of Minneapolis, since we are not as latitudinally blessed* as that city, but nearly 14½ hours of daylight. Unless you were out late or up very early, you'd never see the lights.
* Mineappolis is 45° N; Sydney about 34° S. The southernmost city in Australia, Hobart, is only 43° S. Dunedin in New Zealand, at roughly 46° S, is currently blessed with 15¾ hours of daylight.
For my American readers (hi there!) Sydney is about the same distance from the equator as Long Beach, California. And no, it doesn't snow here. Particularly not at Christmas. Except for one occasion, on which subject Google has let me down utterly...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:54 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 214 words, total size 2 kb.
Friday, December 24
Optics, Aesthetics, and the Transhuman Era
You know, if through genetic engineering or some nanotechnological miracle cure all of humanity is gifted with perfect vision, there won't be any more girls with glasses.
This makes me sad.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
07:16 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ditto likewise. Huge tracts of land? Long legs? Nah... gimme glasses and an interesting nose.
Posted by: Wonderduck at Saturday, December 25 2004 01:47 AM (6iibX)
2
It's the wrong time of year to be thinking such dark thoughts. :)
Posted by: Ted at Saturday, December 25 2004 09:38 AM (ZjSa7)
3
There will always be some running about in shades. We've at least got that going for us.
Posted by: Jim at Saturday, December 25 2004 05:08 PM (GCA5m)
4
Don't worry, you'll be genetically modified so that this makes you happy instead of sad.
Posted by: TallDave at Wednesday, December 29 2004 05:24 PM (M0J/c)
5
Be of good cheer, for with the stigma of physical imperfection removed, glasses will be free to become the pure ornaments to the (female) face that they can be.
Besides, in-glasses HUD will arrive before direct neural links, so perfect eyesight won't eliminate all use for them.
Posted by: HC at Saturday, January 22 2005 09:00 PM (7Yj0R)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thursday, December 23
Wednesday, December 22
What's In Your Stars For 2005
Hydrogen.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
07:35 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Mine contain a large amount of iron; should I be worried?
Posted by: JohnL at Thursday, December 23 2004 12:43 AM (gplif)
2
Yes. You should return your star to the manufacturer as soon as possible; it may be unsafe for continued use.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, December 23 2004 01:34 AM (uOsif)
3
Well if you need a top up:
http://www.defectiveyeti.com/archives/001120.html
Posted by: Rob at Thursday, December 23 2004 06:46 AM (kXZI6)
4
Mine makes a funny squeaking sound. When I called customer service they told me it was normal, that stars tend to produce helium.
Posted by: McGehee at Thursday, December 23 2004 09:17 PM (S504z)
5
W0w, all th4t5 1n my $74r5 1s pl45m4...
Posted by: XPM4$t3r at Friday, March 04 2005 05:46 PM (RF270)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Monday, December 20
To The Point
“Peace and wealth and effective medicine and a comfortable home with air conditioning...”My little aside bagging Noam Chomsky in
About the Author, and my choice of
Oliver Kamm as my latest Blog of the Day after a long absence, are not some momentary aberration, but rather a return of this blog to its roots.*
After the recent electoral victories of the right people in Australia and America I felt as though a great weight had been lifted - or to use a less cliched phrasing, as though a critical and feared exam had turned out to be, relatively speaking, a walk in the park. And here we are in Graduate School, exams no longer looming on the horizon, but still a huge amount of work to be done.
Because, you have to understand, I'm not a Conservative. Neither George Bush nor John Howard truly represent my views on most subjects. I am pleased by their respective victories primarly because both are fundamentally honest, and I was deeply opposed to John Kerry and Mark Latham primarily because both challengers seemed to me to be deeply, personally, dishonest.
Look, I'm not a child; I don't expect politicians to tell the truth all the time. Sometimes they can't - they have to deal with matters of security that cannot be made public. Sometimes they won't, because, well, politics is like that. But the dishonesty of Kerry and Latham runs much deeper; they are not honest even to themselves.
What I'm really most directly opposed to, and what I've been fighting for years, long before I set up this blog, is not the political Left as such but intellectual dishonesty.
I'm not, technically, a scientist, though I would have been, technically, a scientist had I troubled myself to attend my classes and so ultimately graduated.** That doesn't mean that I can't recognise Science - the process, the method, even more than its vast body of discoveries and achievements - as the single greatest invention of Western Civilisation. (Number two being the limited liability corporation, something that far too many people take for granted.)
My aim is to promote Science and Civilisation, and it's a selfish aim. I want the products of Science and Civilisation for myself: Peace and wealth and effective medicine and a comfortable home with air conditioning and a fancy computer and an interesting and productive job. The people who attack Science and Civilisation are trying to deprive me of all that, and I won't allow it.
The Creationists pushing their fraudulent spin on Evolutionary Theory; the Post-Modernists denying the concept of Objective Truth; the Islamists trying to do both at the same time; the historical revisionists; the Psychics; the "Alternative Health Practitioners"; the academics who see their role being not to teach but to brainwash their students into leftist zombiehood; the "free speech" proponents who want to stamp out speech they don't like; Mysticism and Obscurantism; the spammers and scammers and hackers who are doing their level best to destroy the Internet; the nanny-state idiots and the totalitarian hardliners who try to legislate problems out of existence: These and more are what I truly oppose.
So I shouldn't want for subject matter.
* Not that it has any.
** I was studying Computer Science, hence the "technically". Still, it's better than Sociology...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:44 AM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 557 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Yay! I encourage the ridicle of dogmatism wherever it may be found, whether it be the religious right or the religious left (being those lefties so anti-religion that there is a religious zeal about their anti-religionness. (And the third greatest invention of Westen Civilization is air conditioning...)
Posted by: Susie at Monday, December 20 2004 11:21 AM (3nS88)
2
That pretty well sums up why I'm here.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at Monday, December 20 2004 01:07 PM (U3CvV)
3
That pretty much sums up why I blog.
Posted by: Dean Esmay at Monday, December 20 2004 07:05 PM (LOj+R)
4
If you include refrigeration in with A/C, Susie, I'd agree with you.
Pixy, I think we are on a similar wavelength. I spent the first 3 weeks after September 11th, 2001 debunking Nostradamus rumors (and other similar pass-arounds).
Cheers!
Posted by: Kathy K at Monday, December 20 2004 07:06 PM (fGtFB)
5
"Still, it's better than Sociology..."
I resemble that remark!
Seriously, sociology is a fairly mature field of study. The forces at play in human interaction are relatively well understood (keep in mind that sociology is a totally different field from psychology, which does involve a lot of mumbo-jumbo revolving around sheer speculation as to what takes place inside the human brain).
"Hard" science, on the other hand, can't even tell us what matter is fundamentally composed of! New, previously unknown sub-atomic particles of indeterminate function are discovered all the time, and we have string theorists running around telling us that the universe really has somewhere around 8 to 12 dimensions (they're not too sure about the number).
I'm not anti-hard science, but I think it is a critical mistake to think that social science is all frivolous silliness. The technologies that humankind is now developing will be so powerful that they may well lead to our extinction - unless we make a conscious, serious investment in learning how best to control them and use them wisely.
Posted by: MikeR at Wednesday, December 22 2004 02:47 PM (h8FAf)
6
The greatest invention in the history of the human race is "room service".
Posted by: Rossz at Wednesday, December 22 2004 04:19 PM (NEjeN)
7
"Hard" science, on the other hand, can't even tell us what matter is fundamentally composed of!
Sort of. But they have a couple of points strongly in their favour: first, they know what they don't know; second, they have a theoretical and experimental strategy for finding out. Not that an answer is guaranteed or anything; the Universe doesn't come with an Owner's Manual.
I'm not anti-hard science, but I think it is a critical mistake to think that social science is all frivolous silliness.
I don't think that, but it does seem that Sociology (and Pschology too) is too susceptible to fashionable nonsense and cargo-cultism (that is, papers and "theories" that use all the terminology of Sociology without actually
saying anything). I would expect that a serious Sociologist would view this sort of thing with every bit as much antipathy as Marc Miyake views Chomsky's Universal Grammar, as a hijacking of what should be a respectable field of research.
The technologies that humankind is now developing will be so powerful that they may well lead to our extinction - unless we make a conscious, serious investment in learning how best to control them and use them wisely.
Fire, the wheel, the inclined plane, and now this so-called
lever! This mad rush to embrace poorly understood technology will be the end of us!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, December 22 2004 07:47 PM (uOsif)
8
Just the LLC? I'd say the second greatest invention ought to include all flavors of corporations.
Not that I'm trying to tell you what to think or post.
Posted by: Squidley at Thursday, December 23 2004 12:35 PM (06/Rc)
9
Well, yes, but there is a specific value to the LLC that is distinct from the other types. And it
sounds better that way. ;)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, December 23 2004 07:23 PM (uOsif)
10
What is the problem with mysticism? I don't see it.
Posted by: wanderer at Saturday, December 25 2004 08:50 PM (3ULfT)
11
The problem with mysticism is that it is self-important nonsense, and that many of its purveyors are out-and-out frauds.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, December 27 2004 08:19 AM (+S1Ft)
12
:-) Gadflyism is part of the process of metamorphisis that many undergo before they get serious. I would conjure that no real deep serious arguements can be made without an intuitive synthesis. Reason only takes you to the ledge of balance, it is something like mystcism that lets one leap into the unknown. Most skeptics and poo-pooers of mysticism are merely people afraid of something that doesn't seem understandable.
yes I have seen self-important nonsense and frauds. But that is more a description of human nature than of mysticism. Those types occur in every strata of human affairs.
Mysticism is about the mysteries of life and the mechanisms needed to understand them. Both sides of that coin provide ample opportunity for someone to fool someone else and ask for money in return.
Posted by: wanderer at Wednesday, December 29 2004 12:46 AM (3ULfT)
13
Unfortunately, that just illustrates my point.
Mysticism is about the mysteries of life and the mechanisms needed to understand them.
No it isn't. That's Science.
Mysticism is about making up answers that sound nice but don't mean anything.
Science
works. Mysticism doesn't.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, December 29 2004 01:55 AM (+S1Ft)
14
:-) Many of the great scientists of the past were involved in Mysticism. The secret societies in Europe were used to transfer scientific knowledge. Foolish? or more well rounded? Science is a component of mysticism. The unreasoned faith is what is off-skew. A student of mysticism would experiment and prove the qualites of the mind to oneself. My intition says 10 is an important number here. That is making up an answer. But it's not really an answer. It's a seed. But it does mean something. To me at least. It only means something to us if we have a meeting of minds. Unmeasurables between people have to be measured over time as an observer. One can only prove to oneself what dreams mean, how group dynamics work, what creativity is. At the edge of everyones mind is a next step that is difficult to take. When that idea sparks, one gets an inkling of how it's created.
Actual accepted knowledge and the progress of the experimental method. In those terms, Mysticism is the part that allows for greater creativity and an ethical egress into the next unknown area.
Posted by: wanderer at Thursday, December 30 2004 02:21 AM (3ULfT)
15
Many of the great scientists of the past were involved in Mysticism. The secret societies in Europe were used to transfer scientific knowledge. Foolish? or more well rounded?
The Mysticism? Foolish, no question.
The transfer of knowledge I'm fine with.
A student of mysticism would experiment and prove the qualites of the mind to oneself.
How? Exactly?
My intition says 10 is an important number here.
My inductive reasoning, seated in decades of observations and scientific study, says you're a fruitbat.
In those terms, Mysticism is the part that allows for greater creativity and an ethical egress into the next unknown area.
In other words, make stuff up and pissing off before they catch on to you.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, December 30 2004 08:17 AM (+S1Ft)
16
Make Up Stuff is what the Scientific Method works on. They have an idea and want to prove it. Mysticism can be the dynamics at the edge of theory on why a mind is similiar or dissimiliar to another.
Harmonics is probably a tool widely used in Mysticism to establish a correspondence between phenomena.
Projection is another. But from there we get into stuff that doesn't really mean anything to skeptics.
One of the ideas advocated by mystics is that it is the science of religion or the faith of reason. It exists between the two, but used to be solely based in religion before the Dark Ages. Classical thinkers are drawn on a lot as to show the progression of the ideas of man from Eygpt, thru Greece, the far east, and the Renaissance.
The idea of thesis, anti-thesis, synthesis in its essence is a primary foundation of practical mysticism.
In more mundane terms something a mystic might study. Opening a fortune cookie, does it reveal a pre destined event or does ones mind grow to fit the fortune as a form of suggestion? We mystic students order take out a lot.
On the more looney side. If you are cloud watching and a cloud moves as you thought it would. Did your mind move the cloud or did the cloud move your mind?
Mysticism would say that there is an intelligent source behind both. And both of the previous paragraphs can be harmonically corresponded for things to think about.
Mystics that I know have this deadly little gem that it can only be known by practice not by observation.
The ethical egress above I see is a vague statement based on how you interpeted it. What I meant(I Think :-) is that at the moment of scientific gnosis there is an instant of ethics about the conclusion to be rendered and published. While I don't hold myself to that strict standard, I think some scientists do.
Posted by: wanderer at Wednesday, January 05 2005 11:43 PM (3ULfT)
17
oh, my response never posted.
well I have forgotten it now.
I was vague on ethical egress above. What I meant is that at the point of scientific gnosis when applying the SCi Method, there is a brief moment where a scientist makes an ethical decision about the baby. The decision sets the stage for the next synthesis of experimentation of ideas.
Mysticism would include the Scientific method as a tool, but it wouldn't say that it is the whole story. It would say though that the tool lets one measure the truth or falsehood of results.
Maybe your interpetation of it is called curiosity.
Posted by: wanderer at Sunday, January 09 2005 01:50 AM (3ULfT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Sunday, November 07
And As The Sun Sinks Slowly In The East
Note: This is not satire. Not a bit. The editors of The Guardian are noted for their insensibility to irony and lack of appreciation for the absurd.
Guantanamo Serenade (an extract from The Men Who Stare At Goats, by Jon Ronson)
The more I've delved into the US military's psychological warfare, the more examples of New Age-style, First Earth Battalion tactics I've been noticing in the war on terror. I learned of one fact in particular that struck me as entirely incongruous, something at once banal and extraordinary.
And what might that be, we ask?
When I met Jamal, he began to tell me about the more bewildering abuses. Prostitutes were flown in from the US - he doesn't know whether they were there to smear their menstrual blood on the faces of the more devout detainees. Or perhaps they were brought in to have sex with the soldiers, and some psychological operations (PsyOps) boffin - a resident cultural analyst - devised this other job for them as an afterthought, exploiting the resources at the army's disposal.
"One or two of the British guys," Jamal told me, "said to the guards, 'Can we have the women?' But the guards said, 'No, no, no. The prostitutes are for the detainees who don't actually want them.' They explained it to us: 'If you want it, it's not going to work on you.' "
"So what were the prostitutes doing to the detainees?" I asked.
"Just messing about with their genitals," said Jamal. "Stripping off in front of them. Rubbing their breasts in their faces. Not all the guys would speak. They'd come back from the Brown Block [the interrogation block] and be quiet for days and cry to themselves, so you know something went on, but you don't know what.
Yes, I know that the last time a woman stripped in front of me and rubbed her breasts in my face, I was so distraught I... Err, enough that.
What other tricks did the fiendish Yanquis employ?
The interrogators were getting more and more cross with Jamal's apparent steely refusal to crack. Also, Jamal used his time inside the Brown Block to do stretching exercises, keeping himself sane. Jamal's exercise regime made the interrogators more angry, but instead of beating him, or threatening him, they did something very odd.
A military intelligence officer brought a ghetto blaster into his room. He put it on the floor in the corner. He said, "Here's a great girl band doing Fleetwood Mac songs."
He didn't blast the CD at Jamal. This wasn't sleep-deprivation, and it wasn't an attempt to induce the Bucha Effect. Instead, the agent simply put it on at normal volume.
"He put it on," said Jamal, "and he left."
"An all-girl Fleetwood Mac covers band?" I said.
"Yeah," said Jamal.
Aieee! The inhumanity of man's inhumanity to man's fellow man, or however it goes.
This sounded to me like the tip of a very strange iceberg.
"And what happened next?" I asked.
"When the CD was finished, he came back into the room and said, 'You might like this.' And he put on Kris Kristofferson's greatest hits. Normal volume. And he left the room again. And then, when that was finished, he came back and said, 'Here's a Matchbox Twenty CD.' "
"Was he doing it for entertainment purposes?" I asked.
"It's interrogation," said Jamal. "I don't think they were trying to entertain me."
"Matchbox Twenty?" I said.
Matchbox Twenty?
"I thought they were just playing me a CD," said Jamal. "Just playing me a CD. See if I like music or not. Now I've heard this, I'm thinking there must have been something else going on. Now I'm thinking, why did they play that same CD to me as well? They're playing this CD in Iraq and they're playing the same CD in Cuba. It means to me there is a programme. They're not playing music because they think people like or dislike Matchbox Twenty more than other music. Or Kris Kristofferson more than other music. There is a reason. There's something else going on. Obviously I don't know what it is. But there must be some other intent."
Aha! Now I see the evil Yanqui scheme!
No I don't.
"Hm," said Joseph.
"Do you think ...?" I said.
Joseph finished my sentence for me.
"Subliminal messages?" he said.
Subliminal messages!
"Or something like that," I said. "Something underneath the music."
Underneath the music!
How could you blast someone with silent sounds "without it affecting us"? This struck me at the time as an unassailable argument, one that cut through all the paranoid theories circulating on the internet about mind-control machines putting voices into people's heads. Of course it couldn't work.
The thing is, I now realised, if silent sounds had been used against Jamal inside an interrogation room at Guantanamo Bay, there was a clue in Jamal's account, a clue that suggested that military intelligence had craftily solved the vexing problem highlighted by Colonel Alexander.
"He put the CD in," Jamal had said, "and he left the room."
Aha! Fleeing the subliminal messages! Or possibly just a music lover. (Matchbox Twenty?)
Next, I dug out the recently leaked military report entitled Non-Lethal Weapons: Terms And References. There were a total of 21 acoustic weapons listed, in various stages of development, including the Infrasound ("Very low-frequency sound which can travel long distances and easily penetrate most buildings and vehicles ... biophysical effects: nausea, loss of bowels, disorientation, vomiting, potential internal organ damage or death may occur. Superior to ultrasound ...").
You know, this is actually true. Blast someone with sufficiently loud very low-frequency sound and it basically shakes their internal organs to pieces.
They tend to notice when you do this, of course.
And then, the last entry but one - the Psycho-Correction Device, which "involves influencing subjects visually or aurally with embedded subliminal messages".
I turned to the front page. And there it was. The co-author of this document was Colonel John Alexander.
So, not Matchbox Twenty?
I'm confused.
(via Tim Blair)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:36 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 1027 words, total size 7 kb.
1
The only problem with sumliminal message theories (Only problem? Well, that's excepting the whole tinfoil hat thought process.) is that they don't work. At all. There has been exactly one study done that showed submliminal messages working and that was quickly shown to be fraudulent. Not quick enough to stop the establishment of sumliminal messages as a fact in the minds of many, of course.
Besides, even the discredited theory of subliminal messaging requires that the subject be concentrating on the carrying media. Who the hell would expect somebody to concentrate on Matchbox 20?
Posted by: Jim at Tuesday, November 09 2004 09:46 AM (tyQ8y)
2
I've been warned about these same subliminal messages. Did Jamal have an overpowering urge for a Coke and Popcorn?
Posted by: Gordon at Tuesday, November 09 2004 01:57 PM (dqTOU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
83kb generated in CPU 0.1429, elapsed 0.2358 seconds.
56 queries taking 0.1972 seconds, 280 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.