You're Amelia!
You're late!
Amelia Pond! You're the little girl!
I'm Amelia, and you're late.
Sunday, April 20
The Stupid, It Burns
Some of the later comments come from people with some sort of clue, but there really are people who think
Expelled has
some sort of value, rather than being a lie based on a lie based on a lie.
Congratulations. The Religious Right has found its Michael Moore.
(Via
Instapundit, who writes
At any rate, according to the comments, at least, there's more to the film than I.D. twaddle. Yeah. The film blames the Holocaust on Charles Darwin. That's something more than the usual I.D. twaddle alright.)
Update:
Stupidity abounds. Again, some well-informed souls brave the fires of wilful ignorance, but the post and the comments thread alike are, for the most part, hot air.
Update the Second: Glenn has now added a link to
Expelled Exposed - possibly because I emailed that link to him, though he adds:
I hate writing about this stuff because -- pardon me while I speak
plainly -- the people on both sides of this issue are assholes. I mean,
even by the low standards of Internet discussion. I'm getting email
calling me a "theocon shill" for mentioning Stein, and email telling me
I'll burn in hell for calling Intelligent Design "pernicious twaddle."
Frankly, the rabid atheists and the rabid creationists seem an awful
lot alike, and no proper hell could be truly hellish without the both
of them yammering away at each other. Feh.
There's a certain degree of truth in this, but the two groups are not equally detestable. While I dislike unnecessary rudeness at any time, if you insist on being rude, it helps to also be
right. cf. Gregory House.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
06:03 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 272 words, total size 2 kb.
1
One should never debate a creationist without first locking up all breakable items within reach... including the creationist.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at Monday, April 21 2008 07:00 AM (2XtN5)
2
Have you ever noticed how atheists on TV are always grumpy old men?
(Except for StarGate... the whole SG-1 team are atheists, if you watch closely enough. But you have to really look for it.)
And House is a drug addict to boot. But at least he's funny.
Posted by: Yahzi at Tuesday, April 22 2008 01:23 PM (yn9dj)
3
Well, SG-1 has a good reason for their atheism - they meet the gods every week.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, April 22 2008 02:23 PM (PiXy!)
4
Ya - and every other week, they
kill one.
One of my favorite moments: Teal'c has been brain-washed by Apothesis and is back to worshiping him. Carter is trying to argue with him, and he says, "Why do you challenge my faith? I don't challenge yours." And she says, "That's different."
Putting that cop-out in the mouth of that character served two purposes: it let the script-writers say something they could never say out loud, and it was funny as heck.
Posted by: Yahzi at Tuesday, April 22 2008 03:35 PM (yn9dj)
5
erm....i called dr. reynolds a theocon shill, andrew.
it was me.i am so exercised about Expelled because it is just
IQ-baiting.i mailed dr. pournelle...im trying to get chaos-manner to talk about it.
Posted by: matoko_chan at Wednesday, April 23 2008 02:39 AM (bqE4v)
6
dr.reynolds did tell me that he linked expelledexposed bcause you asked him too.
it was a really good thing i think.
charles and zombie defended evolution over 2500 comments
charles has over 30 trackbacks
capn ed got 2...one of which was yours...an t'other one was dr. reynolds.
hehe
so cool to watch....memetic transmission and diffusion ...
right out of cavalli-sforza
Posted by: matoko_chan at Wednesday, April 23 2008 02:47 AM (bqE4v)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wednesday, April 16
Bugger And Double Bugger
I was thinking of doing a full system backup of mu.nu last night, but decided to leave it for another day because it was already very late.
Naturally, the system crashed overnight. Drive failure.
The only thing on the plus side is that it was the backup drive that failed.
So we're back, minus backups.
mee.nu is actually on a different server, but relies on the mu.nu server for DNS. I need to untangle that a bit so that this doesn't happen any more.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:16 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 88 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I was wondering what had happened. Rumours mentioned a DDOS on Jawa, but I couldn't figure out how that would knock mee.nu off the air.
Posted by: Will at Wednesday, April 16 2008 10:27 AM (WnBa/)
2
I figured it was a something of the sort... either that or Australia was taken out altogether. Since that might just have made a dent in the news up here - I thought I'd wait and see what really crashed.
Posted by: Teresa at Wednesday, April 16 2008 11:17 AM (rVIv9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Friday, February 15
This Is Your UI Design On Drugs
I just installed Office 2007 for the first time.
WHAT WERE YOU IDIOTS THINKING?!
The "ribbon". It's like a toolbar, except that it takes up far more space, you can't customise it, and you can't see everything at once. In other words, it's a toolbar without any of the advantages of a toolbar.
AND THEN THEY REMOVED ALL THE MENUS!
What the hell? No, seriously, what the hell? They took a successful professional application and turned it into an irritating
toy.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
11:28 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 88 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Not had today's pocky Pixy ?
Not sure about customisation. But I've found the ribbon to be ok. Its actually a tabbed toolbar to logically group more functions together. Plus they can squeeze oh so many more controls on since they've got the entire toolbar to do it.
At least thats how I see it.
Hiding it away is fine with me as well as it gives more visual workspace. On the Latitude D630 screen space isn't so much an issue. However my new X61 only sports a 1024x768 screen so hiding everything away isn't such a bad idea.
In fact I'm hiding the whole ribbon when not in use.
Its just different in my book.
Posted by: Andrew at Friday, February 15 2008 01:41 PM (vK23k)
2
Ah... this would be why I have implored people who are used to the older versions of Office to not upgrade. It's the kind of thing that can drive you nuts. You "knew" how it all worked... now you don't. *sigh*
Posted by: Teresa at Friday, February 15 2008 03:39 PM (rVIv9)
3
When I evaluated Vista and Office 2007, I decided that I'd rather upgrade the entire company to Vista than give anyone a copy of Office 2007. At least with Vista, 99% of users would spend a few minutes figuring out where their everyday tasks got moved to, and then be happy. Most of them
live in Office, though, and operate it by reflex; UI changes there are much more significant.
Naturally, you can still buy XP, but new Office 2003 licenses are just a dream.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at Saturday, February 16 2008 06:15 AM (2XtN5)
4
You should try Lotus 1-2-3. Amazing power and ease! The trick is in the forward /.
Posted by: Kevin at Saturday, February 16 2008 06:20 AM (eUFRP)
5
Hehe, I thought I was the only one who found this incredibly annoying.
The first time I opened it I was like "wtf where is edit???"
Vista and Office 2007 are just awful. Never before has an upgrade been such a downgrade in functionality and ease-of-use.
I tried to avoid Vista, but Dell wouldn't sell the new video cards without it.
Posted by: TallDave at Monday, February 18 2008 11:34 PM (kv6le)
6
I hear ya, Pixy.
But that's why I use Open Office
Posted by: kyer at Tuesday, February 19 2008 07:23 AM (i+d8H)
7
I just started using Office 2007 and, frankly, I think this is the best interface move Microsoft has made for anything. I still think Vista is a worthless upgrade to XP and so on, but the Office 2007 ribbon is actually quite functional once you get over the learning curve.
And as a student of usability, this is a better idea than menus upon menus with billions of hidden options. I will give props to M$ when they (rarely) get things right, and this is something they got right.
Posted by: Brandon at Tuesday, February 26 2008 05:52 AM (I0jMM)
8
I've had serious problems with Office.
Outlook just stops sending/receiving, with no notice or error. You don't realize anything is odd until you notice you haven't gotten any email for a long time.
The ability to right-click suddenly goes away for no apparent reason (I assume this is a Vista problem more so than Office). It also causes you to be unable to select a window from a group, or toggle Desktop. Very very bad.
Posted by: TallDave at Sunday, March 02 2008 12:42 PM (kv6le)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Saturday, January 26
Bad Software Design
Aargh.
Let's say you have an ADSL router - we'll call it a Getnear DG834 - and you're happy with it, but you just installed a second ADSL connection and you want to extend your wireless network, so you bought a Getnear DG834G (G for 802.11g wireless), and you plug it in to your notebook and run the installation software, you'd better be damn sure that you turn off your wireless access before you do that because otherwise the software will
SEEK OUT AND BRAIN-WIPE YOUR EXISTING ADSL ROUTER.
A factory reset will fix that, but you'd better remember exactly what your username and password are...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
06:27 PM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 109 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Looks like the spambots have found a way through the defenses. The recent comments area of the mee.nu mainpage looks like a meat-byproduct bomb went off.
Posted by: Will at Wednesday, January 30 2008 02:11 PM (P2D1U)
2
Bah!
I shall get that fixed, and ban them some more.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, January 30 2008 02:12 PM (PiXy!)
3
Okay, they're gone for now, but it looks like I'll need to add some new terms to the filter.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, January 30 2008 02:16 PM (PiXy!)
4
Sweet.
On another note, I left a comment a little while back in the "misc. errors" thread in meenu's "help" page. The "help" recent comments don't seem to be showing up on the "help" page either.
Thanks
Posted by: Will at Thursday, January 31 2008 04:01 AM (WnBa/)
5
Re: Bad software design. Interesting isn't it how we learn about things like remembering logins and passwords.... I once thought I had lost EVERYTHING on a business computer and racked my brains for the password and even contemplated buying a $400.00 cracking program till I remembered the "secret word." Now, all passwords and log ins are kept on a single sheet of paper in a safe. but even then you can lose it if you forget it before you write it down.
Bye the bye, are we going to get "ugh" trackback capability on mu.nu anytime soon? I have a number of folk asking to tb to my posts.
Posted by: GM Roper at Sunday, February 03 2008 01:58 AM (CglRh)
6
Here is an interesting glitch.
.gifs decaying?
The line along the bottom and the abbreviation of the actual loop happened just today.
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Wednesday, February 06 2008 11:20 AM (oh2F1)
7
Here is an interesting typo...omitting the pertinent url.... :/
http://brickmuppet.mee.nu/w00t1
There we go.
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Wednesday, February 06 2008 11:23 AM (oh2F1)
8
..oh and the edit icon doesn't work in Firefox.
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Wednesday, February 06 2008 11:42 AM (oh2F1)
9
The spammers are back! WOW! (three times; one's been there for a couple of weeks)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Thursday, February 07 2008 07:51 AM (+rSRq)
10
Hey Pixy, just linked
this post at Daily Pundit. We might see some unusual traffic.
Posted by: Old Grouch at Sunday, February 10 2008 05:46 AM (1LNXJ)
11
Old Grouch - No worries. That page is small and loads nice and fast.
Brickmuppet - odd. I've seen that happen on very rare occasions, but it's not specific to Minx. It happens if for some reason the GIF file is incomplete. When it expires from your browser cache and is reloaded, it suddenly works again.
Could have just been a glitch with your internet connection, but if it happens again, let me know.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, February 10 2008 08:35 PM (PiXy!)
12
Hello again!
Hotlinked
this image in
this comment at Daily Pundit. Others have obviously seen it (see
comment #2), but it's not visible today (even to me). Then there's
this report.
Do I have a permissions problem, or is this one of those "you're not supposed to do that" things?
Thanks.
Posted by: Old Grouch at Tuesday, February 12 2008 03:13 AM (Vt3Uu)
13
The youtube widget seems not to be working....
http://brickmuppet.mee.nu/test
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Wednesday, February 13 2008 03:27 PM (ZRqDn)
14
Old Grouch - hotlinking is disabled by default. Um. And you can't really change the default, either. Best to link to a page instead.
Brickmuppet - hmm. I'll reply on your blog.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, February 13 2008 11:25 PM (PiXy!)
15
No problem, I understand why it's that way. Must have been seeing my own cache.
Posted by: Old Grouch at Thursday, February 14 2008 12:51 AM (OWhCc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Friday, January 18
AGGAEGRWEFKHW$FKH!!@#$*&!@#$!@!
Or,
Return of the Revenge of the Hard Drive Destruction Bunny, Episode 5: Slow Lingering Squeaky Death on USB StreetI had one thing left to do before my new Windows box was fully operational and I could turn the old one off for good: Migrate iTunes. This is an absolute cow of a job, and it's not being made any easier by the fact that the disk holding my podcast collection has suddenly decided to drive off a cliff.
Actually, it hasn't died all at once, but it has developed, apparently, a couple of
hundred thousand bad sectors. I've set an rsync script up to try to scrape the data off, but the drive sometimes resets itself after spending too long re-re-re-reading one sector and then rsync skips the rest of that directory.
Updately-doo: I've retrieved 172GB out of 174GB from my podcast directory. There's a bunch of duplicates in there too, so some of the lost episodes are probably retrievable.
I'm also thinking that if this disk has been playing up for a while, that might explain some of the odd behaviour of iTunes, such as it suddenly freaking out and re-downloading an entire podcast (hence the duplicate files) and eating 10GB of my precious bandwidth unexpectedly.
Or that might just be iTunes. Who knows?
Unfortunately, Windows doesn't report drive errors until it actually fails outright. It will sit there for a minute, or two, or five, trying to read a particular sector, and not bother to tell you that anthing is wrong.
I have smartd running on my Linux box, but it mostly reports that my drives are hot enough to boil water (when in fact they are only slightly above room temperature). I want a cute anime girl popping up on my desktop to tell me that
the engines are about to explode drive C has had so many unrecoverable read errors in the last hour, or whatever. Don't make me go and crawl through the log files, because I'm probably only going to do that
after something has failed.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:55 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 345 words, total size 2 kb.
1
"I want a cute anime girl popping up on my desktop to tell me that
the engines are about to explode drive C has had so many unrecoverable read errors in the last hour, or whatever."
I'd settle for Scotty. ("Cap'n, the laws of entropy ar' catchin' up wi' us!")
Seriously, anyone aware of a utility that does this?
Posted by: Old Grouch at Sunday, January 20 2008 04:55 AM (UHY8s)
2
There are SMART monitoring utilities for Windows out there. I currently use a simple one that shows the current status, without any warning popups, but a quick google for "SMART drive monitoring utility" came up with
http://hddlife.com
Posted by: Kayle at Monday, January 21 2008 05:23 AM (yG9oH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wednesday, January 09
Put Them All In A Blender And Set It To Puree
Warning: The following post contains more than the usual Ambient Irony level of vulgarities. But it fucking well needs to.More
insightful coverage of the proposed Great Firewall of Australia:
BROADBAND Minister Stephen Conroy faces an
uphill struggle in his plans to increase internet censorship by
boosting the official blacklist from a puny 1000 web pages to many
millions of banned websites.
Quick aside: The 1000 web pages mentioned here is a list of sites that the Australian censors make available to web-filtering companies. It is not a list of sites currently blocked or banned by the government.Industry commentators
say the task may be beyond the capabilities of filtering mechanisms and
procedures, and it would be impossible to block all such material.
Senator Conroy will seek to halt access to child pornography,
X-rated and violent material for all home users through mandatory
filtering by internet service providers.
Actually, child pornography has only appeared as a (deeply dishonest) rhetorical point; the filters are intended to block access to violent or pornographic material in general. Child pornography is, of course, already illegal to create, distribute, or possess.
The scope of the problem is, however, immense. Policing child pornography alone could be beyond present capabilities.
True, the police have been unable to stamp it out, but that's not what this article is saying:
According to Bernadette McMenamin, the chief executive of
anti-child-abuse group Child Wise, more than 100,000 commercial
websites offer child pornography and more than 20,000 images of child
pornography are posted on the internet every week.
I can certainly believe the 20,000 images a week, considering the sheer volume of stuff that hits Usenet alone. The 100,000 sites seems rather high, and Ms. McMenamin offers
no evidence to support her numbers.
But that's not the point here. The point is this:
Various international groups have estimated the number of child
pornography websites alone to be in the millions, while one local
internet service provider told The Australian it could be as high as 30
million sites globally.
The point is, the people writing about this are completely clueless. There are 30 million child porn sites globally? Thirty million? Are you out of your fucking minds?
Are there 30 million sites on the web with violent or sexually explicit content? Yeah, maybe, and if these morons go ahead with their plans this will become number 30,000,001. But to equate pictures of women who have temporarily mislaid their clothing with something that is outlawed in every civilised country in the world is either incredibly stupid or outrageously dishonest.
Senator Conroy's office is, however, not deterred.
"Admittedly, it will be difficult, but that's the intention,"
Senator Conroy's spokeswoman said yesterday. "Obviously there are many
sites out there and they change their names. It's going to require a
fairly vigilant monitoring system and it's not going to be 100 per cent
foolproof."
So, they're going to pay people to track down these 30,000,000 sites, check them carefully for restricted content, and add them to the list?
(Snipped - a few paragraphs regarding the technical limitations of internet filtering and the fact that Senator Conroy's plan is doomed from the get-go and will cause nothing but damage to Australian business and Australia's reputation.)
The internet regulator, the Australian Communications and Media
Authority, has struggled to stem the flow of prohibited web content, as
most of the material is hosted offshore. Moreover, it can only act on
complaints.
Struggled to stem the flow of prohibited web content, eh? And how much has it struggled?
In 2006-07, there were only 602 complaints, resulting in five take-down
orders over locally hosted content; 494 overseas-hosted items were
referred to internet filter makers for inclusion in their products.
Good grief. And these are the people you expect to police the entire internet? I had more queries regarding mu.nu in that period (albeit not about offensive content) (mostly) and I operate that in my spare time with a budget of
zero.
Oh, and five take-down orders? And now you're planning to escalate that to 30
million blocked sites? Good luck, guys.
The US is by far the largest source of illegal and offensive material.
In 2006-07, it accounted for 53 per cent of the total, according to
ACMA, followed by Russia at 11 per cent.
America, fuck yeah!
ACMA's Donald Robertson confirmed there were "currently 1000 pages on the blacklist".
"We're also part of an international network that generates 300,000
investigations per year into offensive and illegal internet pages," he
said. "The majority of these investigations relate to child
pornography."
300,000 investigations per year? That's quite a lot. I'd like to know what these investigations involve; I suspect that most of them involve "Go away you idiot; there's nothing illegal about that site."
Senator Conroy's spokeswoman said the blacklist would be expanded
through liaison with the Australian Federal Police, and international
agencies such as Interpol and the FBI.
Oh good, the police will be involved in a national internet censorship scheme.
She said technical difficulties
would be resolved in filtering trials being conducted by the ACMA in
Tasmania. "We have a lot of experts coming to us saying, this can be
done," she said."We'll be testing the best overseas models, the best advice and the
best new technologies." Three previous trials by ACMA - in 2001, 2003
and 2005 - all found problems, including filters allowing banned
material through and wrongly blocking legitimate content. A test of six
filters recorded a relative loss of network performance ranging from 18
at best and 78 per cent at worst.
Only 18 to 78% performance reduction on a small-scale test? Let's make it mandatory for the entire country!
Senator Conroy has been prodded into action by Family First senator
Steve Fielding, and the Australian Family Association, which scorned
the former government's $85 million free filters for families package
as wholly inadequate.
It called for automated content filtering technology to scan for
objectionable content, and a new "grey list" of sites, such as those
promoting anorexia.
And the agenda becomes blindingly clear: Following the ideology of a single senator who isn't even part of the governing party, the Australian government is supposed to examine every web page in the world and decide who can and can't read what.
Who voted for these cretins? Because, if it's you, this is your fault.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:27 PM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 1045 words, total size 7 kb.
1
If it gets so bad you decide to move to the USA, I'll vouch for you.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at Thursday, January 10 2008 07:06 AM (UquFN)
2
Damn. And I was looking at Australia as the place to move if the USA got too crazy.
Posted by: ubu at Thursday, January 10 2008 09:02 AM (fURYZ)
3
I don't think this will actually pass, at least, not in its present form. It came up in similar form twice during in the past 12 years, and was watered down to the present situation (five takedown notices in a year). But it's incredibly annoying that it's come up
again with the new Labor government.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, January 10 2008 10:31 AM (PiXy!)
4
Yeah, Pixy... we'll adopt you if you have to leave Australia suddenly.
In the meantime, let's look at their numbers and I'll take the smaller one - leaving the 30,000,000 alone.
We're also part of an international network that generates 300,000
investigations per year into offensive and illegal internet pages...
That works out to 822 investigations per day every single day of the year! Now add 3 more zeros onto that and you have the estimated number of sites that must be evaluated per DAY - every day - for the year... to keep track of all the porn.
I'm thinking that someone in the government is getting a real kick out of checking out this stuff - best of all they can claim it's all "legal" and part of the job description. Heh.
This kind of garbage pops up over here in America every few years. Makes me want to find these people and smack them.
Posted by: Teresa at Thursday, January 10 2008 12:15 PM (rVIv9)
5
You have to congratulate Mr Conroy. He has managed to push home loan interest rates off the front page. The Swan now has time to think of something intelligent to say.
Posted by: Big al at Thursday, January 10 2008 03:26 PM (XqSSr)
6
So, Pixy, (I have sent several e-mails to you that have gone unanswered, so I apologize for leaving this off-topic comment) - what is the possibility of getting my site moved to the minx server that everyone is raving about?
I thoughht I had gotten on the list a while ago.
The spam attack crap is driving my readers nuts lately.Thanks in advance!
Posted by: Mark at Friday, January 11 2008 01:57 AM (3W582)
7
Sorry Mark! I think I did get your emails, but things have been insane the past month.
I'll get a site set up for you today. I'll copy across all your existing content, and if you're happy with the new site I'll switch you over.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, January 11 2008 02:45 AM (PiXy!)
8
Aw, thanks, man!!! I really appreciate it. Sorry to keep on you, especially if things have been so crazed. It's good to know there's hope on the horizon!
Posted by: Mark at Friday, January 11 2008 11:30 AM (3W582)
9
I voted for none of those cretins.
It's not my fault.
Losing your E-mail addy was my fault though.
Which is why this comment is not on topic, but is a tech question.
Is Live Journal a banned domain? A commenter on my site just said that she had to log out in order to comment as her site was "banned".
Here is her site
Umm, hyperlinks can't be generated in AOL, but the other HTML gadgets in the toolbar seem to be working fine.
Also pictures cant be inserted in a post using AOL 9.0. I'm in a cybercafe so it may be an issue with their set-up, but I've had a similar issue at home.
Best,
Ken
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Wednesday, January 16 2008 10:47 AM (qBCpG)
10
This is the slippery slope to hell.
This is like banning the printing press because people are printing pr0n with it.
BTW I know how they get the 100,000 number: 1) they assume that many legitimate pr0n sites use underage models out of carelessness (failure to check ID, etc) 2) they include places in Europe where the age of consent is less than 18 (there are certainly 16-year-olds that a normal man would find attractive).. The number of sites actually catering to those miscreants interested in pre-pubescents is probably very small because they are heavily targeted by LEO. The number hosted in America is probably zero, for the same reason.
Also, when they say "violent content" they are likely referring to the many, many S&M/fetish sites out there. Most of them are relatively tame, though some of the Russian ones are a bit disturbing. Still, there's no evidence that I'm aware of that anything nonconsensual is going on.
Posted by: TallDave at Friday, January 18 2008 02:50 AM (oyQH2)
11
Brickmuppet - sorry, probably someone spammed us with LiveJournal links, and now the entire domain's getting filtered. I'll fix that now.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, January 18 2008 10:46 PM (PiXy!)
12
TallDave - I don't know that nude photos of 16-year-olds are even illegal in Australia. Certainly when I was 16, it wasn't that unusual for an under-18 girl to appear nude in a magazine here.
Of course, I only bought them for the articles!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, January 18 2008 10:48 PM (PiXy!)
13
Unless it's changed recently, 16-year-old erotic nude models are still legal in the UK, as well. I remember about ten years ago Mayfair's "coming next issue" section eagerly announced they'd be featuring a busty 16-year-old. Since I was reading this in California, I wondered what the importers would do about it.
The next issue arrived at local newsstands with carefully blacked-out and snipped sections. The girl was fully exposed, but all instances of the word "sixteen" had been removed...
In the Sixties, it wasn't unusual for Playboy models to be under 18, but it wasn't until the strict federal record-keeping law went on the books in 1985 that everyone really took it seriously. I know two Playmates from 1984 who lied about their ages; one added three years to reach a legal age, and the other removed three to avoid being "too old" for Playboy.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at Thursday, January 31 2008 11:21 AM (9Nz6c)
14
That was after that one girl (damned if I can remember her name) made all those porn movies while she was underage. I remember hearing that one time she walked onto a set and announced, "Hey, guys, it's my 18th birthday! Let's party" -- and there were heart attacks all around. All her movies had to be recalled. (And there were a lot, because she was gorgeous and really popular.)
Then the porn industry started getting serious about checking ID.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Thursday, January 31 2008 11:59 AM (+rSRq)
15
Tracy Lords has repeatedly denied that she outed herself, but coincidentally, the only film where her contract included royalties was the one made after she turned 18.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at Thursday, January 31 2008 01:32 PM (9Nz6c)
16
Yeah, that was the girl. That was a real scandal in the industry; I remember it.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Thursday, January 31 2008 01:52 PM (+rSRq)
17
The girl was fully exposed, but all instances of the word "sixteen" had been removed.
That is truly beautiful.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, February 01 2008 12:24 PM (PiXy!)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Tuesday, January 01
New Boss, Worse Than The Old Boss
The Rudd government has started its term off with a thud, vowing to build a Great Firewall of Australia to block out naughty pictures.
Actually, it's worse:
They're forcing other people to pay to build and operate that firewall:
AUSTRALIANS will be forced to contact their internet service provider to avoid having their access to the web restricted.
The
restrictions are planned by the Federal Government to give greater
protection to children from online pornography and violent websites.
Under the plan, all internet service providers will be required to
provide a "clean" feed to households and schools, free of pornography
and other inappropriate material.
Any internet users who want to "opt out" of the clean feed will have to contact their ISP.
The Howard government looked at a similar apporach nearly a decade ago, but backed away in favour of end-user filtering applications. The Rudd government, it appears, is made up of the same sort of "think of the children!" nanny-state authoritarians, only with added stupid. After all, in 1998 it wasn't painfully obvious to the uneducated that this can't possibly work. In 2008, there's no excuse for this:
Communications Minister Stephen Conroy said everything possible had
to be done to shield children from violent and pornographic online
material.
"We have always argued more needs to be done to protect children," he said.
Senator Conroy said the clean feed, also known as mandatory ISP filtering, would prevent users accessing prohibited content.
"We will work with the industry to get the best policy. (But) Labor is committed to introducing mandatory ISP filtering."
Everything possible has to be done, eh, Senator Conroy? How about we just ban the internet entirely? That'll protect the children real well.
Quick note on the logistics of the thing: There is no centralised control of the internet in Australia. There are hundreds of ISPs here. As far as I am aware, zero of them are set up to enforce this sort of idiocy.
Give me ten seconds and I can dig an SSH, SSL or PPTP tunnel out of Australia and bypass any security they care to implement short of a central firewall, and a central firewall would disrupt business and communications all over the country.
On top of that, we have a clear
the Web is the Internet mentality here, not something you want to see in a federal communications minister. Or, Senator Conroy, were you planning to filter Usenet and email and BitTorrent and FTP and IRC and Gnutella and eDonkey and Kademlia and DC++ and fifty other P2P protocols?
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
12:09 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 428 words, total size 3 kb.
Thursday, December 06
Sunday, September 30
Oh My Stars, It's Full Of Pleh
Stargate Atlantis season 4 is here.
First episode is pretty solid, except
aah asteroid belt asteroid belt aah!Yeah, standard bad-scifi subplot since at least, oh, 1890. I'm sure someone, at some point, has got it right. I mean, just speaking statistically...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
12:29 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
1
But, but, but without the aah asteroid belt asteroid belt aah there wouldn't be anyplace for the aliens to hide, there wouldn't be any sudden wayword bigassed rocks to threaten earth, there wouldn't be anything to catch the van Allen belt on fire... why, it's indespensible.
Posted by: GM Roper at Monday, October 01 2007 03:40 PM (S60yG)
2
What the Smurf is Pleh?
Is this one of those Aussie words?
Like U2?
In Japan I was utterly befuddeled by a man in the gaijin house who was "going to get U2".
(I never really "got" U2 myself though their music was not bad. 
Only much later did I realize, he was getting a job driving a "ute".
You aussies are SUBVERTING the emerging English skills of a whole race!
Posted by: Ken Talton at Tuesday, October 02 2007 04:49 PM (67e0P)
3
Offtopic, Pixy, but...
I love The New Pond, what do I have to do to make it happen?
Posted by: Wonderduck at Wednesday, October 03 2007 04:12 PM (xC579)
4
Let me know if you can log in okay, and I'll switch you across.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, October 03 2007 08:03 PM (PiXy!)
5
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, October 03 2007 08:11 PM (PiXy!)
6
Yeah!
(Sorry, just fixing the comment listing so that it doesn't mess up on long unbroken words.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, October 03 2007 08:13 PM (PiXy!)
7
Pixy, I can indeed log in. Throw the switch, and bring your greatest* creation to life!
*note: Wonderduck's Pond may not, in fact, be your greatest creation... or a great creation at all.
Posted by: Wonderduck at Wednesday, October 03 2007 10:51 PM (qBCpG)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, October 04 2007 11:08 AM (PiXy!)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thursday, September 27
Pixy's Tip Of The Day
Never run phpBB and a multi-domain Movable Type installation on one CPanel server.
Don't. Just.... Don't.
Now I'm off to scan 38,000 files for possible nasties.
Update: Started out just scanning the filenames. Smart move.
Two Three nasties detected and removed.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
06:17 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think the truth is you should never run phpBB at all...
Posted by: Kean at Thursday, September 27 2007 10:58 PM (Lgt1Q)
2
Okay... I'll remember... I'll file this with the advice a very nice elderly lady gave me one time.
She said "My dear, never buy a house in Palm Springs. Rent instead. There is so much sand, it's not worth it to buy."
I figure one day all these little tidbits I'm collecting will come in useful. You never know. ;-)
On a bloggy note - I cleaned up my blogroll considerably by putting the "blogrolling" lists into scroll boxes. I'm wondering if that would have helped with the comment page problem. *grin*
Posted by: Teresa at Friday, September 28 2007 12:22 AM (rVIv9)
3
Pixy,
I may have uncovered a problem with your magnificent minx setup. Font size should probably be controlled. Just sayin'.
Posted by: Kevin at Saturday, September 29 2007 12:18 AM (f0QzP)
4
ack. That didn't work even CLOSE to how I planned it

.
Posted by: Kevin at Saturday, September 29 2007 12:18 AM (f0QzP)
5
Heh. Yeah, slight difference between the way the editor shows that and the way it turns up in the page. The CSS is set up so that you can't screw up the layout with a comment, but I'm not sure exactly why the lines overlap like that. Line height is set as a percentage, which should be relative to the font size...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Saturday, September 29 2007 12:51 AM (PiXy!)
6
That is a modern-art masterpiece.
Posted by: Will at Saturday, September 29 2007 01:26 AM (SOx9v)
7
That is vandalism. (There's a difference, these days?)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Saturday, September 29 2007 09:28 AM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Wonderduck at Sunday, September 30 2007 12:55 AM (xC579)
9
Pixy, off-topic bug report: I was just browsing the "Shingu" category on Chizumatic, and when I click the "more..." link (same result on the 1st, 2nd, and 4th posts from the beginning of the category, that's all I've tried), it gives me the first page of the category browsing again instead of the full post.
This is the URL being generated for the "more..." link, if it helps:
http://chizumatic.mee.nu/shingu/shingu_secret_of_something-or-other#more
Posted by: Griffin at Wednesday, October 03 2007 06:53 AM (dz2zY)
10
This seems to be a bug that happens when you add a post to a category after the fact. I'm investigating further.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, October 03 2007 08:02 PM (PiXy!)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
98kb generated in CPU 0.0336, elapsed 0.1571 seconds.
58 queries taking 0.1334 seconds, 293 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.