I'm in the future. Like hundreds of years in the future. I've been dead for centuries.
Oh, lovely, you're a cheery one aren't you?
Friday, April 28
Rant
Morons. Leftists. Telstra. Possums. Grrrr.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:39 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 7 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You must have had one hell of a morning. Being hassled by idiotic leftist possums over the phone? That really does suck.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Friday, April 28 2006 02:28 PM (+rSRq)
Posted by: HC at Friday, April 28 2006 03:02 PM (0uWAs)
3
Most succinct rant I've ever read.
Posted by: Light & Dark at Friday, April 28 2006 08:21 PM (M9GWX)
4
...and they're all in your walls, right?
Posted by: Wonderduck at Saturday, April 29 2006 12:46 AM (7+BNY)
5
Are they even still using the old Telstra communication satellites?
Posted by: triticale at Monday, May 01 2006 02:39 PM (Ib4dG)
6
"Telstra" is an Australian phone company. "Telstar" was a communications satellite launched in the early 1960's.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Monday, May 01 2006 03:07 PM (+rSRq)
7
That was a feeble attempt at humor; not the first you've ever seen from me. I wasn't sure what Telstra was (I was thinking of that synthetic fat substitute) but I knew it wasn't the satellite.
Posted by: triticale at Wednesday, May 03 2006 11:25 PM (B24x8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Tuesday, April 11
Die, Pus Monkeys!
There are few things more thoroughly screwed up than video on Windows. The endless range of differing, pointless, and poorly designed containers and codecs, and the endless bugginess of the programs themselves, makes it agonising to do anything serious with video created by someone else. You find one program that works, and stick with it - and then you get a file from someone else created with
their program that works, and suddenly your program crashes mid-way or corrupts the video or the audio drifts out of sync or it just plain refuses to open the file.
All I was trying to accomplish today was to convert the opening credits of Hand Maid May into a good-quality AVI file. I have at least a dozen programs that purport to do this, but not one of them produced respectable results. Two of them crashed repeatedly, and one would not even recognise the straight-off-the-DVD MPEG-2 file.
To the rescue: VirtualDubMod. I use VirtualDub for all my AVI editing, because while it is not even slightly fancy, it actually does what you tell it to. But it only handles AVI files. VirtualDubMod is a modified version of VirtualDub (which makes sense) that can also cope with Ogg and Matroska and MPEG files. What is not immediately obvious (because it doesn't show up anywhere) is that it can just as easily read the VOB files you find on a DVD.
A little bit of tweaking of the DivX 6.11 codec (never needed to de-interlace the video before) and viola! There are still some compression artifacts, so I'm going to have one more shot at it and then upload whichever version looks best.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:35 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 284 words, total size 2 kb.
1
AutoGordianKnot works great for me. It creates command line inputs to other progs based on some basic preferences. It uses VDub to 2-pass process VOB files with excellent quality/size properties.
http://www.autogk.me.uk/
Posted by: ct at Tuesday, April 11 2006 10:21 AM (iH6Wf)
2
Thanks, that sounds like just what I was looking for.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, April 11 2006 10:24 AM (oyvZL)
3
Yeah Windows video is a mess. I find it hard to believe that it's merely coincidence that RealPlayer, the prinary competitor to Windows Media Player, is the only program, bar none, that will, on a regular basis, completely freeze my Windows session and force me to turn the power off and on again to restart it.
I got the Hand Maid May DVD a couple weeks and watched the first couple episodes. Annoyingly over the top in some scenes, but overall interesting and worth seeing (tx to SDB for rec).
Posted by: TallDave at Tuesday, April 11 2006 09:11 PM (H8Wgl)
4
I'll just note that AutoGK is indeed the bee's knees. Makes it dead easy to produce high-quality DVD rips. The Hand Maid May and Dirty Pair clips I've posted were produced that way.
I plan to raid my DVD closet* next weekend and upload everything I can find.
* I still haven't gotten around to putting up shelves...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, April 11 2006 09:43 PM (LUBRF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Monday, April 10
Wunch of Bankers
The current issue of
New Scientist has a cover story about water:
You Need It, But You Won't Believe Why: Water's Quantum Secret. It's mostly about the hydrogen bonds between water molecules, and how they make water act quite unlike otherwise similar compounds. It's not anything new, but interesting enough if you haven't run into the topic before.
And then the article suddenly careers off the cliff into the Great Homeopathic Swamp:
That there is something more to water than hydrogen and oxygen is something many researchers welcome. But Rustum Roy, a materials scientist at Pennsylvania State University in University Park goes further. He thinks it is time for a radical overhaul of the scientific view of water - one which, he believes, has been dominated by chemistry for too long. [Oy. — Ed.] "It's absurd to say that chemical composition dictates everything," he says. "Take carbon, for example - the same atoms can give you graphite or diamond."
Well,
duh, Mr Materials Scientist. That's due to the
chemical properties of carbon.
In a review paper published in Materials Research Innovations in December, Roy and a team of collaborators called for a re-examination of the case against the most controversial of all claims made for water: that it has a "memory".
And I call for a re-examination of your head, Mr Roy. I think you were dropped on it.
The physical nature of water is quite straightforward: It does not have a memory. This has been verified experimentally so often that only the very deeply stupid and outright frauds suggest otherwise.
The idea that water can retain some kind of imprint of compounds dissolved in it has long been cited as a possible mechanism for homeopathy
See my comment on the stupid and the fraudulent.
which claims to treat ailments using solutions of certain compounds.
But doesn't.
Some homeopathic remedies are so dilute they no longer contain a single molecule of the original compound -
Exactly so. And homeopaths, who knowingly sell their customers distilled water and sugar pills, claim that these are the most effective.
- prompting many scientists to dismiss homeopathic effects as imaginary.
Bullshit, Mr New Scientist Editor.
What has prompted all competent and honest scientists to dismiss homeopathic effects as imaginary is that it doesn't do anything. It's been tested. It doesn't do anything. Yes, all physical, chemical and biological theory tells us that it won't do anything, but that pales beside the experimental evidence for it not doing anything.
Roy believes that by taking homeopathy seriously scientists may find out more about water's fundamental properties.
Pixy Misa believes that Roy was dropped on his head as a child.
The present editors of New Scientist, though, are merely an irresponsible bunch of scoundrels in it for the money.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:40 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 451 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Regrettably, not everything from my alma mater is worth the time. At least this professor was not convicted of murder...before he became a professor!
It is depressing how the Mat Sci department has gone to the morons. We have or had a couple of fine professors from the UK in the department back in the day. Very good, very funny, very intelligent and sensible bunch.
C.T.
Posted by: C.T. at Monday, April 10 2006 05:14 PM (ehvnJ)
2
Hah! Good ol' Dr. Roy. He was the laughingstock of the
local paper in State College, PA throughout my college years, and most
of my good-for-nothing years as well. He was batshit in a fairly
tedious and long-winded manner. So he's selling homeopathy
now?
I seem to remember someone publishing a study claiming to actually get
some positive results on a homeopathic claim last year, but I fear to
google for it lest I fall into a truly septic mountain of moonbat guano
on the way...
Posted by: Mitch H. at Tuesday, April 11 2006 01:49 PM (iTVQj)
3
There WAS a (sort of) vindication of homeopathy awhile back, but it wasn't for the reason the homeopathic advocates claim. What they found was that very dilute concentrations of things like radon and arsenic that are poison in higher concentrations actually do have beneficial effects. That is NOT, or course, the same as saying you can keep adding water to something ad infinitum and get the same effects.
And there WAS actually some recent hullabaloo about the fundamental properties of water, which inolve its shape.
Still, this article sounds wacky. I was considering a subscription to NS, but I guess I'll stick with SciAm and Science.
Posted by: TallDave at Tuesday, April 11 2006 10:20 PM (H8Wgl)
4
There are almost infinitely many examples of substances that are deadly in large doses but can be beneficial in small doses and under the right circumstances. Salt is a good example. Water is another. Homeopathy still doesn't work, of course.
I used to buy New Scientist every week without fail, but it's been going steadily downhill for years. Sad, really.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tuesday, April 11 2006 11:30 PM (LUBRF)
5
Come to think of it, oxygen would fit that criteria too (Okay, so it has to be pure oxygen under very high pressure. But you have to start labeling one of the most corrosive gas dangerous at SOME point.).
C.T.
Posted by: C.T. at Wednesday, April 12 2006 02:45 AM (8Arod)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Friday, April 07
Welcome To Sunny Belgium
Trackback spam capital of the universe.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
04:32 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sorry, I'm going to hijack this comment thread for some experimentation.
This post uses the following formatting buttons from above:
bold italic underline strike super
script sub
script. All text was typed in, then selected with the mouse before applying formatting. I am not previewing before posting.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Friday, April 07 2006 03:19 PM (+rSRq)
2
This time I will preview before posting:
bold italic underline strike super
script sub
script
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Friday, April 07 2006 03:21 PM (+rSRq)
3
bold1 bold2 italic1 italic2The editing system seems to be using the "strong" tag for bold and the "em" tag for italics. At the preview I will change bold2 to use the "b" tag and italic2 to use the "i" tag.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Friday, April 07 2006 03:23 PM (+rSRq)
4
OK, Pixy says he's fixed it. Let's see:
bold italic underline strike super
script sub
script
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Saturday, April 08 2006 12:28 AM (+rSRq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
No.
Moron.
I know that you didn't expect or want an answer, Doug, and were merely seeking an opportunity to parade your ignorance and arrogance in front of the world, but you did ask:
...wait a minute, you're telling me that scientists have been preaching Godless evolution all this time without a legit fish-to-tetrapod missing link?! Well what were you using all this time on the fossil tree, science fiction? Luckily, no gap is so great between species that can make some scientists lose their faith in a dogmatic fundamentalist allegience to Materialist Darwinism.
And the answer is
no.
Moron.
You're welcome.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
04:03 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 101 words, total size 1 kb.
Saturday, April 01
Ze Goggles, Zey Do Nothing!
For a forum devoted to high-end video systems,
this is mind-bogglingly hideous.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:51 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Eeek. Thats pretty nasty.
Have you seen the revised Slashdot ? Its colour is chosen to entice a section of the population that doesn't read it. :)
Posted by: Andrew at Sunday, April 02 2006 03:55 AM (0585Z)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, April 02 2006 05:35 AM (S6OAx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
56kb generated in CPU 0.0233, elapsed 0.1557 seconds.
55 queries taking 0.138 seconds, 237 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.