Wednesday, June 01

World

History Stood on its Head

This one sentence from that Newsweek article, out of all the nonsense and blather, has been niggling at me:
World War II was fought not just to defeat the Axis powers, but to make the world safe for the United Nations, the precursor to the World Trade Organization, the European Union and other international institutions that would strengthen weaker countries.
It's just so wrong, so irredeemably and inexcusably wrong.

Who were the Axis powers? Primarily, Germany, Italy and Japan. Spain was aligned with them; Hitler and Mussolini lent support to Franco in the Spanish Civil War. There were a number of other minor partners; Finland, for example, aligned itself with Germany because it saw Russia as a graver threat.

What was the war about? Germany, Italy and Japan wanted to secure more land and resources. Germany in Europe; Italy (as a lesser partner) would take the uninteresting bits of Europe (like Albania) and Africa; Japan would take eastern Asia and the Pacific. Look at this handy little map to see what they were up to.

Who opposed them? Well, Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland, early targets during the war in Europe, simply didn't have the military strength to stop the Axis. Japan had already invaded Manchuria in 1931* and was expanding its presence there. There were three powers in the world that posed a significant threat: Britain, particularly the Royal Navy; Russia; and the United States.

The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (a non-aggression pact between Russia and Germany) dealt with Russia. Russia was ill-prepared for war at the time, having systematically destroyed the effectiveness of its own army through purges. Britain was more of a problem; the hope there was that it could be isolated until Germany and Italy had consolidated their position in Europe.

As for the United States, the chief plan was not to get them involved in the war. That may sound like a dreadful miscalculation, but in 1935 Congress had passed the Neutrality Act, which prohibited American support for any nation at war. The Act was renewed as late as 1939. American isolationism was in full flower in the 1930's, and the Axis powers were banking on it.

Then, of course, they screwed everything up. With a characteristic combination of paranoia and overconfidence, in 1941 Germany declared war on Russia and Japan declared war on the United States. The two sleeping giants were called into play in the war against the Axis, and after four more years of terrible bloodshed, the Axis was finally crushed.

World War II was entirely about the ambitions of the Axis powers. America wanted only to keep to itself; Britain had its Commonwealth; Russia was in no shape to do anything. Germany, Italy and Japan decided to take over the world. It sounds crazy. It was crazy. Something like 50 million people died for their ambitions.†

I wonder why Newsweek wants us to believe otherwise.

* The League of Nations, the UN of the day, did nothing.
† Estimates vary significantly in many cases.

Footnote: Britannica Online has this appalling bit of doublethink:

Axis Powers

Coalition headed by Germany, Italy, and Japan that opposed the Allied Powers in World War II.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at 08:40 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 534 words, total size 4 kb.

1 It's just so wrong, so irredeemably and inexcusably wrong.

I completely agree, but I like the way Wolfgang Pauli put it - "This paper is so bad it is not even wrong."

Posted by: allagash at Thursday, June 02 2005 10:01 AM (M5ajh)

2 Oooh! OOOh! I can do it, too! The Franco-Prussian War was fought to make the world safe for the personal computer... The 100 Years War was fought to make the world safe for elevators... The Crusades were fought to make the world safe for a Woman's Right to Choose... See, it's easy! Pick any war, and then pick any concept that didn't exist yet....

Posted by: Susie at Friday, June 03 2005 05:07 PM (V1YvO)

3 Umm, that handy little map-link was about the situation the war was in when the tides turned and Reich started losing. They were going for world domination...

Posted by: A Finn at Monday, June 06 2005 07:40 AM (lGolT)

4 Finland, for example, aligned itself with Germany because it saw Russia as a graver threat. Nah, we had just had Winter War with Russia a year ago, so there was no way anyone would have fought on the Russian side. Germans had helped us in military conflicts, so of course we helped them when they asked us to.

Posted by: A Finn at Monday, June 06 2005 07:54 AM (lGolT)

5 Regarding the handy little map link, the US post office published a series of them on the in 1991 through 1995, here.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, June 06 2005 07:59 AM (+S1Ft)

6 Nah, we had just had Winter War with Russia a year ago, so there was no way anyone would have fought on the Russian side. True enough. That was a side-effect of the German-Russian non-aggression pact; it left Russia free to attack Finland. You could have fought both, but then you would have lost. Germans had helped us in military conflicts, so of course we helped them when they asked us to. Yeah. Only problem with that is that they were completely insane. Still, caught between Germany and Russia, you were pretty much screwed no matter what you did.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, June 06 2005 08:18 AM (+S1Ft)

7 We did actually fight 'em both, Russians first, then Germans when the bloodless retreating wasn't good enough for Russians demanding to see some Nazi corpses lying around Lapland.

Posted by: A Finn at Thursday, June 16 2005 05:44 PM (lGolT)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
44kb generated in CPU 0.0413, elapsed 0.1962 seconds.
56 queries taking 0.1699 seconds, 224 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.