It was a bad day. A lot of bad stuff happened. And I'd love to forget it all. But I don't. Not ever. Because this is what I do. Every time, every day, every second, this: On five, we're bringing down the government.
Tuesday, September 19
Brain Slugs R Us
I've had my brain slug removed.*
The thing that has eaten all my time for the past two months is done, dealt with, finished, over, forgotten, dead and buried at a crossroads at midnight with a wafer in its mouth and a stake through its heart.
Cough.
I'm back to working on Minx. Being paid to work on Minx. Not quite full time - under the agreement I worked out, I have to look after some other stuff as well - but it is the major focus of my day job. (As well as being a major focus of my free time.) Yay for that.
Right now I'm setting up Kyon, Yuki and Mikuru, the Minx development and test servers. Haruhi is running pretty well, by the way, though of course the super-duper Core 2 Duo with 4GB of memory is brought down to Earth on a regular basis by software, peripherals, and networks.
My iPod is still working. My notebook has started crashing randomly again.
And tomorrow I turn 40.
I'm not going to have a mid-life crisis. I'm too busy dealing with actual crises, thank you very much.
*"Poor little guy starved to death."
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:13 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 204 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"...buried at a crossroads at midnight with a wafer in its mouth and a stake through its heart."
And upsidedown... I hope you buried it upsidedown or it will come back to haunt you. *grin*
Glad to hear things are going better.
Posted by: Teresa at Tuesday, September 19 2006 11:55 PM (o4pJS)
2
For what it's worth, I thought you were older.
Happy Birthday, Mr. Pixy!!!
Posted by: Wonderduck at Wednesday, September 20 2006 02:39 AM (6YRS5)
3
May the cities in your wake burn like candles on your cake....
Happy birthday.
Posted by: Kristopher at Wednesday, September 20 2006 10:51 AM (O5Ju8)
4
http://badexample.mu.nu/archives/197453.php
Posted by: Harvey at Thursday, September 21 2006 07:27 AM (L7a63)
Posted by: Oddybobo at Thursday, September 21 2006 08:58 AM (mZfwW)
6
*singing* Happy Birthday Dear Pixy, Happy Birthday to you!
Posted by: Susie at Thursday, September 21 2006 09:32 AM (I8uqK)
7
HB2U
HB2U
HB Dear Pixyyyyyyy!
HB2U.... and many more!
Posted by: Michele at Thursday, September 21 2006 10:11 AM (etwyR)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, September 21 2006 10:42 PM (FRalS)
Posted by: Sissy at Thursday, September 21 2006 11:23 PM (e+8WB)
10
Yay!
Happy Falling-out-of-your-mom-while-the-rest-of-the-tribe-treks-across-the-Serengeti-hunting-blue wildebeest Day!
(bet nobody has ever wished you a Happy BDay that way before, eh?) hehe
Hope it's a good one!
Posted by: kyer at Friday, September 22 2006 01:01 AM (PyUGA)
11
Happy belated birthday, kiddo.
Posted by: Tink at Saturday, September 23 2006 11:37 AM (11q5z)
12
Birthdays are for the weak.
Posted by: TallDave at Friday, October 06 2006 03:10 PM (oyQH2)
13
Sleep is for tortoises!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, October 06 2006 10:01 PM (FRalS)
14
Specialisation is for insects!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, October 06 2006 10:01 PM (FRalS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thursday, September 14
Lights, Action, Camera!
I'm in the market for a new camera.
I have a Sony DSC-S85, which is quite a good camera, but it's rather slow (really bad for action shots), has only a modest zoom range, and only supports Memory Stick cards up to 128MB.
I'm not a professional photographer, or even close, and for the most part I'm planning on taking outdoor photos for web use. I need a camera that is fast, easy to use, not overly bulky, not overly expensive, has a good zoom lens, and can take a decent sized memory card.
I'm thinking of getting the Panasonic FZ50. It's not a pocket camera by any means (it's bigger than my S85), but 10 megapixels and a stabilised 12x Leica lens? Works for me.
Yes, a digital SLR would be better. But a digital SLR with a couple of decent lenses would run twice the price of the FZ50. And I'm not going to be producing A3 prints of my photos; I'm going to be scaling them down, if anything.
Thoughts, anyone?
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
11:54 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 180 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The classes converge recently, with the so-called "advanced" camera like the FZ50 nearing the SLR class. The SLR manufacturers responded with things like Canon EOS 350 (aka "Digital Rebel XT" - I'm still waiting for "Analog Conformist" lineup). I got mine for $780 or so here. The formal price is $799, which is not quite 2 times higher than FZ50. The latter retails between $550 and $599 here. I went with the Canon because for 45% more I was getting the CompactFlash, instant shutter (HATE the lag), and, of course, the lens. Both choices are overkill for the web. The main reason I wanted something better than the trusty Canon A40 was its completely crappy low-light performance., and not the resolution. The 350 though is magnificent. Almost no graining at ISO 800.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Friday, September 15 2006 12:59 AM (9imyF)
2
Low light performance is a very good reason for going with the DSLR. Bigger sensor equals more photons. I don't think that's going to be a big concern for me, though.
I just checked. The FZ50 costs $975 here (I might be able to get it cheaper, but that's what it retails for), and the EOS 350 body costs $1159. $1249 for the EOS 400. The 400 with two Canon lenses (18-55 and 75-300) is $1579. So about 60% more, not double. And the EOS 400 is a better camera than the FZ50, no question.
But I'm not sure I have $1579. :(
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, September 15 2006 02:03 AM (FRalS)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Friday, September 15 2006 02:34 AM (+rSRq)
4
Search for zoom lensed camera reviews, but go at least two pages deep and only look at reviews that are two years old.
Buy whatever was really hot two years ago. It should cost about as much as the entry level 2006 stuff.
Posted by: Kristopher at Friday, September 15 2006 10:29 AM (O5Ju8)
5
Another option is to pickup a 300D on Ebay. <sob>They are going for a song.</sob>
As much as I'd like a newer 400D. I've just scratched the surface with the 300D and need extra lenses before I consider a newer camera.
A good alternative is the Canon Powershot G7. 10 megapixel, 6X zoom (not quite as good as the Pana, iso1600 max for $899 listed.
I tend to prefer the pictures from Canon cameras. Generally more subdued and detailed to my eye.
Posted by: Andrew at Friday, September 15 2006 08:12 PM (t8tOu)
6
Thanks Andrew. I'll check out the Canon as well.
It's a lot smaller and lighter than the Panasonic (6x vs 12x lens will do that).
There's also the Powershot S3 IS - it's only 6 megapixels, but it's still 12x zoom and $300 cheaper.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, September 15 2006 09:55 PM (FRalS)
7
IMO smaller and lighter is good for most cameras. Especially when its impromptu stuff. Not much good missing that great photo since I've left the DSLR at home. Which is usually the case.
WKC picked up a Powershot S80 (which I don't think is available here) over in Hong Kong. Its seems to be the middle ground between the G7 and the S3.
In reality 6 megapixels is high enough detail for printing most normal shots. Even with cropping.
Posted by: Andrew at Friday, September 15 2006 11:01 PM (t8tOu)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Sunday, September 17 2006 10:39 PM (+rSRq)
9
That looks like a good camera too.
Andrew makes a good point - the picture you take on a cheap compact that you have with you is better than the picture you don't take because you left your bulky DSLR at home.
Maybe I'll look for a good mini camera for now, and save for a DSLR later.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, September 18 2006 05:17 AM (0Lkqa)
10
I've had a play with the IXUS 800 and various IXI (is that the plural) at the local DSE Powerhouse.
Altho I quite liked the IXUS 65 which has a 3" screen. The only sacrifice on the 65 was to fit such a large screen meant losing the optical view finder.
Some terrific shots wide angle shots by TJ. The backgrounds are so clear.
Posted by: Andrew at Monday, September 18 2006 08:05 PM (t8tOu)
Posted by: Kristopher at Friday, September 22 2006 11:24 AM (O5Ju8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thursday, September 07
To A Tea
I was trying a new iced tea today (
Tetley Peach and Orange, very nice) and noted that it contained even more sugar than the Lipton tea I normally drink. After consuming an entire 1.25 litre bottle of it, of course.*
And then I wondered just how sweet they could make it.
The answer is roughly ten times as sweet.
I don't think that even I could drink that. It would be like drinking honey, something I hardly ever do.
And you know how honey never spoils?** Plasmolysis. Makes sense; I was wondering where this magical natural antibiotic effect came from. It's nothing fancy, it just dehydrates the little buggers.
* A 1.25 litre bottle of this from the minimart downstairs from the food court I usually go to costs only slightly more than a 500ml bottle bought in the food court. The only problem is that I then tend to drink the whole thing over the course of the afternoon.
** Well, now you do.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
03:35 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 171 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What kind of weird spam attack did you just suffer from? Is it just harassment?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Thursday, September 07 2006 09:30 AM (+rSRq)
2
Heh ... the recent comments are full of random crap.
Is somebody's spam engine broken? Or is your own machine filling your comment database with junk?
Posted by: Kristopher at Thursday, September 07 2006 10:37 AM (O5Ju8)
3
It looks like you have a new mu.nu forum user named "yseibertql".
I'll bet his comment spam is legible in Azerbejani or some such ....
Posted by: Kristopher at Thursday, September 07 2006 10:40 AM (O5Ju8)
4
I think it's just a crapflood, yeah. We've been getting that for a while now.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, September 07 2006 03:55 PM (0Lkqa)
5
It's rather strange. I can't right off think of why someone would do it. Only two things suggest themselves: it's simple harassment (of you), or it's someone debugging their package who for the moment doesn't want to reveal their message payload.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Thursday, September 07 2006 06:06 PM (+rSRq)
6
http://www.honesttea.com/ goes in the other direction: they intentionally put a lot less sugar in their drinks--roughly half the calories compared to their (non-diet) competitors..
Posted by: Kayle at Friday, September 08 2006 03:32 AM (Qsm1J)
7
But then I couldn't fight off infections by plasmolysis!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, September 08 2006 05:23 AM (0Lkqa)
8
I prefer to fight infection by measured ammounts of disenfectant daily (typically by the .40 fl.oz.), but to each his own.
:-D
Posted by: tommy at Saturday, September 09 2006 10:48 PM (UynUa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
56kb generated in CPU 0.0224, elapsed 0.1406 seconds.
53 queries taking 0.1257 seconds, 270 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.