Friday, October 04
Daily News Stuff 3 October 2019
Blearghck Edition
Blearghck Edition
Tech News
- The semi-custom Ryzen APU in the new Surface Laptop 3 is barely custom at all. (AnandTech)
It has Vega 11 graphics like the desktop APUs instead of Vega 10 like the high-end mobile APUs, and that's about it. Standard DDR4-2400 memory too.
- Microsoft's Surface Duo is a dual-screen Android phoneblet with a 180° hinge. (AnandTech)
Not as seamless as the Galaxy Fold but probably more robust. Each screen is 5.6", and it's powered by a Snapdragon 855, but precise specs aren't available yet.
- The Internet of Insecure Pieces of Crap (IoIPoC) strikes again. (TechDirt)
- I still call Australia home. (TechDirt)
I don’t know what the mushy-headed vegans think, or why they think, but they better get this through their mushy heads: that we're changing the law in a substantial way that spells trouble, big trouble, for anyone who goes trespassing on agricultural land with the intention of disrupting agricultural production.
Disclaimer: There is also no b, c, d, f, g, h, j, k, l, n, o, p, q, r, s, u, v, w, x, y, or z either.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
12:02 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 187 words, total size 2 kb.
1
IoPoC: reminder: ring door cams goes to extraordinary lengths (in the US, anyway) to convince users to give the videos to the police, including what I would consider possibly-unethically coaching police in how to ask users.
Posted by: Rick C at Friday, October 04 2019 03:44 AM (Iwkd4)
2
Hmmm. "The problem is that the definition of "inclosed lands" is far wider than just farms." Quibble about whether "inclosed" is an archaic word or not, I don't really see the problem with "the definition is wider than farms". Oh noes, all lands delineable by a wall or other feature, whether natural or artificial, fall under the rule, if I read that correctly.
Whether the law as a whole is a good idea or not is another issue, IMO. Trespass laws are probably fine for deterrence--as long as they're not toothless.
Whether the law as a whole is a good idea or not is another issue, IMO. Trespass laws are probably fine for deterrence--as long as they're not toothless.
Posted by: Rick C at Friday, October 04 2019 03:49 AM (Iwkd4)
3
Land AND other feature. If there's a fence or wall on, say two sides and a cliff and river on the other two it counts.
The way its described could be broad, or it could be awfully specific.
Oh noes, all lands delineable by a wall or other feature, whether natural or artificial, fall under the rule, if I read that correctly.
Land AND other feature. If there's a fence or wall on, say two sides and a cliff and river on the other two it counts.
The way its described could be broad, or it could be awfully specific.
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Friday, October 04 2019 05:48 AM (YUAc9)
4
Going back and re-reading it, I think it's "by a fence" or" partially by a fence and partially by natural features like ariver", where I'm being lazy when I say "fence".
In any event I mainly meant that I'm not sure if "the definition is much wider than farms" is the most important sub-issue.
In any event I mainly meant that I'm not sure if "the definition is much wider than farms" is the most important sub-issue.
Posted by: Rick C at Friday, October 04 2019 06:21 AM (Iwkd4)
50kb generated in CPU 0.0159, elapsed 0.1045 seconds.
58 queries taking 0.0939 seconds, 343 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
58 queries taking 0.0939 seconds, 343 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
