Wednesday, July 19
To add insult to injury, the only browser that seems to work properly in this case is IE. That means my CSS is broken, of course.
Update: When starting with a "known good" version of something and attempting to develop a new system from there, it may prove worthwhile to verify that the "known good" version is, in fact, good. (Which it wasn't, though I'm not yet sure precisely where the problem lies. However, my cleanroom CSS doesn't exhibit the poopy behaviour of the borrowed CSS, so it's in there somewhere.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
04:33 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Dave at Wednesday, July 19 2006 04:49 PM (6GFTi)
Posted by: Dave at Wednesday, July 19 2006 04:52 PM (6GFTi)
A close runner-up involves the fact that it is inordinately difficult to do relative positioning (e.g. "align the bottom with the bottom of the parent").
Posted by: RiotNrrd at Thursday, July 20 2006 08:24 AM (uyRJS)
Posted by: agent bedhead at Friday, July 21 2006 05:16 PM (xV63t)
Posted by: Shawn at Tuesday, July 25 2006 07:25 PM (1nHnP)
56 queries taking 0.0989 seconds, 342 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.