Monday, March 04
I said earlier that I thought there was a bug in the spam filter, such that it was identifying spam but then failing to block it.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
01:07 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 70 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, March 04 2013 01:34 AM (PiXy!)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, March 04 2013 01:35 AM (PiXy!)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, March 04 2013 01:35 AM (PiXy!)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Monday, March 04 2013 01:37 AM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Monday, March 04 2013 01:37 AM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, March 04 2013 01:45 AM (PiXy!)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Monday, March 04 2013 01:55 AM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, March 04 2013 01:59 AM (PiXy!)
OK. Just a point: it shouldn't last forever. At Metafilter they implemented something like that, but only for the first five minutes after you post.
An "infinite edit" function is potentially a means of serious abuse.
(Also, will the edited comment get passed through the spam filter again?)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Monday, March 04 2013 02:24 AM (+rSRq)
And good point on the spam filter - yes, it probably has to go through the filter every time, otherwise it's just a matter of time before some sneaky bugger works it out and abuses it.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, March 04 2013 02:49 AM (PiXy!)
Posted by: Wonderduck at Monday, March 04 2013 03:37 AM (8xjaN)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Monday, March 04 2013 12:15 PM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Monday, March 04 2013 12:46 PM (PiXy!)
56 queries taking 0.1225 seconds, 339 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
