1
Since you mixed your metaphor ("pull out all the stops"?) I'm not sure what you mean. I thought that was a pretty good episode, one of the better ones in the series. (Even though the bad guy in that episode was a joke.)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Tuesday, July 27 2010 12:20 AM (+rSRq)
Broke my glasses last night, which is always a nuisance. I've only ever done it twice - once one of the lenses just popped out of the frame and hit the floor; this time I put them down a leetle too close to the edge of the counter in the bathroom.
So I went and got my eyes checked - yep, still two - very little change in the prescription except that I now need reading glasses as well as the regular ones.
The cost of the checkup was pretty reasonable, even with all the extra tests they run these days. (And the fancy gadgets means they don't need to use those horrible eye drops any more, which is a blessing.)*
The frames were pretty reasonable too, after I convinced the lady that the $99 frames that I liked were better than the (admittedly somewhat sturdier) $299 frames that I hated.
The lenses, though... Glerk.
I hope these see me through another eight years before I need to replace them.
* I love the widget where you look into the lens and it goes whirrr and a green blur resolves itself into a miniature farmhouse, entirely automagically.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
04:33 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 198 words, total size 1 kb.
Saturday, July 24
Amagami SS
So, they've taken a visual novel, and they're going to play through to the end, then rewind, and play through to a different ending... Six times?
Worst part of it is, I rather like it.
At least no-one's gotten stabbed in the head so far.
1
Could be worse. Could be exactly the same story eight times.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Sunday, July 25 2010 12:44 AM (+rSRq)
2
I believe it was almost the same story eight times. (Much as I love Haruhi, I haven't watched S2 yet.)
And I love time-loop stories as well. Particularly the Stargate version of Groundhog Day.
As for Amagami, the first arc of six just completed (each arc gets 4 episodes) and I think they handled it pretty well. Next week messy-haired girl is up, and she looks interesting.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sunday, July 25 2010 02:50 AM (PiXy!)
1
Probably economy of scale. I bet the DAS is a special order, which has to be sheperded all the way through the production line, whereas the server is off-the-shelf.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Saturday, July 24 2010 12:02 PM (+rSRq)
2
I don't know which DAS you were looking at, but if it's the one we build which they rebadge (or heck, most any DAS)... there is quite a bit more to the thing than just a stack of drives.
Dual redundant smart power supply modules, ditto fans, redundant enclosure services modules, redundant internal loops, lots and lots of R&D. It is far more likely to choke itself on some silly internal coding error, than it is to lose your data due to hardware malfunctions... and it is very very unlikely to trip itself on coding errors. Not that they're not there... just that they exist primarily in remote boundary conditions.
Also, the drives will have special firmware, and possibly be the pick of the litter, so to speak.
Posted by: dkallen99 at Wednesday, July 28 2010 02:31 AM (1PFDl)
3
I don't think Dell do special drive versions, though enterprise-class drives certainly do have different firmware than commodity drives.
It does offer redundant controllers as an option, though I didn't configure that. Just having the option increases the complexity and price, of course.
The most expensive component, though, is the drives - Dell's drive prices on their US site are hugely inflated. They're actually about 40% cheaper if you buy them in Australia (though in Australia the rest of the server is more expensive).
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, July 28 2010 03:58 AM (PiXy!)
1
Meh. This sort of hyper-rationalism is usually more revealing of lacunae in the professor's rationalism than anything else. Given the gaps in the array, I'm willing to bet that the author is some sort of scientism-flavored Gaia worshipper, probably with a side of Animal Rights and possibly a garnish of Eugenicist.
Me, I want to know why there's Magick, Wicca, Witchcraft, and Neo-Paganism. That's at least two redundancies, and depending on your definitions, all four are variants on the same blamed thing.
Where's the animism? Pantheism? If you weren't trying to piss people off, you could replace the "Religions" with "irrational" doctrines of the religions, such as reincarnation, transubstantiation, transmigration of the soul, theism, "hard" atheism ("I *know* there's no god, [array of arbitrary scientific assertions] proves it!"), scientism, predestination, free will, etc. Some of the quackeries just seem to be practices which piss off the author - what exactly is irrational about trepanation, for instance? Where's bleeding? Or humour theory?
Also, I'm not sure if the "Zombies" thing is about people who expect Night of the Living Dead or the Haitian abomination, which seems to be a real enough practice of kidnapping and assault-via-drug-abuse & manipulation.
Posted by: Mitch H. at Thursday, July 22 2010 01:29 AM (jwKxK)
2
If you were to periodicise all the different categories of nonsense that our species has invented, the electrons in the outermost shell would exceed the speed of light.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, July 22 2010 01:42 AM (PiXy!)
3
Mitch's point is quite valid. The author included chiropractice. But my operating surgeon sent me to a chiropractor for post-op rehab, without which I would not be able to use my leg for years, or ever. At least he didn't include Climategate, probably the table is old.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Thursday, July 22 2010 12:51 PM (/ppBw)
4
Chiropractors are insane. They believe in a magical energy field called innate intelligence and that all diseases are caused by distortions of this field by what they call subluxations which they fix via spinal manipulation.
Not sure what your operation was for, but chiropractors, when they skip all the voodoo, can be adequate physical therapists for some courses of treatement, albeit unlicensed and poorly trained for that role.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, July 22 2010 04:38 PM (PiXy!)
5
One should make a distinction between garden-variety chiropractors, who are by and large competent physical therapists with an emphasis on joint and bone adjustment, and the old-school chiropractors, who subscribe to the mad pseudo-religious cant that Pixy is talking about. 90% of the bad reputation that chiropractors suffer from are due to these lunatic quacks. It's *sort* of like psychiatrists and Freudians, but amplified three-fold. And kind of like with psychiatrists, people seem to get addicted to regular chiropractic visits. My supervisor is one of those inexplicable people who regularly go to a chiropractic despite not having anything obviously wrong with them.
Posted by: Mitch H. at Friday, July 23 2010 03:03 AM (jwKxK)
If they were genuine medical practitioners, they would have studied medicine. If you want to be a physical therapist, there are degree programs in that field that don't involve rampant pseudoscience. Or you can do the hard yards and earn an MD, and specialise in that field.
Or you can throw rationality and responsibility to the winds and be a chiropractor. They're not all lunatics, but they sure ain't doctors.
The field of chiropracty has no reason to exist. Where it overlaps actual medicine, it's redundant; where it doesn't, it's ineffective and potentially dangerous.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, July 23 2010 03:38 AM (PiXy!)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Friday, July 16 2010 04:39 AM (PiXy!)
3
Who burned you? Walter Jon Williams just did a pretty good murder-mystery about that stupid craze from about six years back that featured large-scale email-style interactive puzzle-rollplaying. I'm not sure if it qualifies as science-fiction, since the only thing even remotely implausible is a rogue HVT widget which strikes me as more of a "five-minutes-into-the-future" than real SF. Especially since nobody's really talking about what exactly happened last May with that five-minute crash in the US markets.
Posted by: Mitch H. at Saturday, July 17 2010 01:15 AM (jwKxK)
4
I was reading the monthly newsletter from Galaxy Bookshop here in Sydney. Greg Egan, Ken MacLeod, and Walter Jon Williams all have books out this month with the same basic premise, and that's just from the authors I was actually looking for. Charlie Stross did it recently too.
So the new rule is, unless your name is Philip K. Dick, the topic is off limits.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Saturday, July 17 2010 03:34 AM (PiXy!)
5
How about movie adaptions ? Could we declare a moratorium on adaptions of P.K. Dick ?
Have you read Daemon by Daniel Suarez ? I've just started it. Pretty good so far.
Posted by: Andrew at Sunday, July 18 2010 12:07 AM (cB03i)
1
I love it that all these people are taking this "remix" so seriously.
If Firefly was on during the days of Airwolf it would more than likely
have an intro like this.
Posted by: Ben at Saturday, July 17 2010 07:57 AM (UrZ9Z)
Via Insty, Mort Zuckerman gets slapped in the face with the cold, dead trout of reality:
The hope that fired up the election of Barack Obama has flickered out,
leaving a national mood of despair and disappointment. Americans are
dispirited over how wrong things are and uncertain they can be made
right again. Hope may have been a quick breakfast, but it has proved a
poor supper. A year and a half ago Obama was walking on water. Today he
is barely treading water. Then, his soaring rhetoric enraptured the
nation. Today, his speeches cannot lift him past a 45 percent approval
rating.
Soaring rhetoric? When he's on (which is rare these days) Obama is wooden. When he's off (-teleprompter) he's simply inept.
To be fair, Australia's own not-late-but-decidedly-unlamented Kevin Rudd was not merely wooden but utterly leaden; his speeches were actively painful.
To continue:
The president failed to communicate the value of what he wants to
communicate. To a significant number of Americans, what came across was a
new president trying to do too much in a hurry and, at the same time,
radically change the equation of American life in favor of too much
government.
And they were right.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
12:40 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 208 words, total size 1 kb.
Tuesday, July 13
Do Senators Make Bad Presidents?
I hold the U.S Senate of recent years in approximately zero esteem (unless esteem can hold a negative value) and it was some dismay that I watched the 2008 presidential campaign narrow to a choice of three senators.
But do senators intrinsically make bad presidents? Let's take a look at what jobs recent presidents held before election.
Senator
Governor
VP
Obama
Bush, G.W
Bush, G.H.W
Kennedy
Clinton
Ford
Harding
Reagan
Johnson
Carter
Truman
Roosevelt, F.D
Coolidge
Wilson
Roosevelt, T
McKinley
Nixon
That leaves out three from the 20th and 21st centuries - Eisenhower, who was a five-star general, Hoover, who was Secretary of Commerce, and Taft, who held a number of roles including Secretary of War.
So, in the last century or so, three men have been elected from the senate directly to the presidency: Obama, Kennedy, and Harding. So, one bad, one potentially great (if flawed), one incumbent. Unfortunately I'll have to rule insufficient data here.
1
The vice-presidency doesn't count - per FDR's first VP, it's not worth a bucket of warm euphemism. Also, the VP's only role is to act as a conditional senator for special tie-breaking and ceremonial purposes. Thus, I'd classify Coolidge and T.R. as falling into the governors-class of presidents, with Taft being a special case because of his immediate experience as a serial colonial governor. Truman, Nixon, and Johnson all get pitchforked into the senatorial claque, with Ford being the sole congressman in the list. Bush the Elder was also a congressman, but he spent far more time as a bureaucratic functionary, and his governance style definitely reflected that mind-set.
That tends to clarify matters somewhat, but the currently favored conventional-wisdom truism that governors' experience prepares for the office while senatorial time-serving ruins a politician for it founders on the rather violent exceptions of Woodrow Wilson on the one hand, and Truman & Kennedy on the other.
Furthermore, the side-theory that primarily non-governmental experience is worthless for the job is spun sideways by the twin contradictions of Hoover and Eisenhower. Hoover's primarily executive experience as the World's Humanitarian Fixer and Eisenhower's service life & apotheosis as Saviour of Europe produced wildly dissimilar White House careers.
I'm inclined to say that experience matters less than personality. Wilson was a ferocious, bigoted, narrow-minded thug, and his single term of office as governor of New Jersey had little bearing on his performance as president. Truman's time in the collegial Senate had little effect on his quietly combative personality and peculiar blend of tenacity and conditional flexibility. I rather suspect that McCain, if elected, would have ended up a second Truman, but obviously Obama has proven to be no such creature.
Posted by: Mitch H. at Wednesday, July 14 2010 03:45 AM (jwKxK)
2
Thanks Mitch. I'll do a new version of the table in the morning with the VP column excised. And always remember that Carter was the Governor of... Someplace or other.
Truman was an interesting character; I'd like to learn more about him.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, July 14 2010 04:56 AM (PiXy!)
I don't agree with that. The VP has often been a springboard to national candidacy for the President, for instance Nixon in 1960 and Humphrey in 1968 and Mondale in 1984, not to mention Bush Sr. They generally haven't been very successful at it, but it's widely viewed as a gateway.
Ford, coming out of the House, is a huge exception because he was never elected to the presidency. After Agnew resigned, which wasn't related to Watergate but happened after it, everyone knew that the new VP which would be chosen (through processes of the 25th Amendment) had a damned good chance of becoming President either through Nixon's impeachment or his resignation.
So the leaders of both parties in both chambers went to Nixon and pretty much told him that the only candidate they'd accept was Ford. He was House Minority Leader and was widely respected by both sides.
So he finished Nixon's second term, but when he ran in 1976 he was defeated by Carter, meaning that he and Rockefeller are the only Pres/VP pair in the history of the nation to not have been elected to the offices. And God Willing, it'll never happen again.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Wednesday, July 14 2010 07:32 AM (+rSRq)
4
As you can see, Senators seldom make it to the Presidency. Most especially long serving Senators. They have to make too many concessions while in office. Concessions put them at outs with their own party. And most of them aren't "pretty" enough for the press to ignore what they have or haven't done while in the Senate. Obama had a huge advantage as he did absolutely nothing while he was in the Senate. (the Illinois State Senate never counted since the press completely ignored the fact that he was ever there).
I always find it amusing when a current serving Senator gets up and starts a speech saying "elect me so I can get things changed" - because being in the Senate would be the place to effect the most change. The President only signs what Congress gets to his desk.
I think you're looking at it the wrong way - it would be more instructive to look at the number of Senators who have run for their party nomination and never made it.
Posted by: Teresa at Thursday, July 15 2010 04:58 AM (ZjbN5)
5
Or simply look at the record of the Senate, to test the hypothesis that senators make bad senators.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, July 15 2010 11:47 AM (PiXy!)
6
Lately that seems to be damn near a given - no matter who the Senator might be. LOL.
Posted by: Teresa at Friday, July 16 2010 02:33 AM (ZjbN5)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
04:27 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
You're Listening to Radiolab
The question is, though, what is the name of Zoe Keating's "new piece that doesn't have a name" (as was). I just went to her site (cheaper than iTunes, offers FLAC downloads, and she gets to keep the money, or at least I hope so) and bought all her albums, so I guess I'll find it soon enough.
Meanwhile In C Remixed is $31.99 on iTunes Oz and they don't have their own online store. I'll probably buy it anyway. But they have Zinc (Zoe In C - Zoe Keating's contribution) as a free download, so naturally I grabbed that first.
Update: It's called Escape Artist. I actually like the version she recorded for the Quantum Cello episode better than the album track, though.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
03:45 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 135 words, total size 1 kb.
Tuesday, July 06
Counterpoint
Angel Beats is... Not even
worth ranting about. The show only avoids being terrible by not having
enough substance to be anything at all. I don't think any of that
supposed potential was actually there - rather just an illusion of potential. It's pretty clear that no-one
involved in the project had any concept of how to construct or tell a
story, or how to draw faces or to animate, well, anything at all.
If they actually fed Haruhi and Shana into a Markov-chain Lua script controlling Maya and Vocaloid and streamed the results straight out onto TBS, then I give them a B for effort. If there were, unlikely as it may seem, real live humans involved in production, then they should be prevented from ever reproducing. You probably wouldn't need to put too much effort into that; just publicise the fact that they worked on Angel Beats.
I give it no nothings out of none.
Fortunately, there is K-On!!, which has a turtle.
Disclaimer: This review is based on watching only the first episode, since the show was cancelled immediately afterwards. In my universe.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Wednesday, July 07 2010 11:54 AM (+rSRq)
2
Wonderduck, actually, but more generally to anyone who thought this thing had any redeeming qualities whatsoever.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, July 07 2010 04:48 PM (PiXy!)
3
That means as a newfag, I shouldn't be here at all. D:
This show was supposed to be part of an entire media franchise: who knows there's going to be an extra DVD episode, a prequel light novel, a side-story about one of the characters etc. to fill the hearts of every otaku with hopeto milk the cash out of the otaku cow to simply illustrate how bad the franchise was.
Back to Haruhi 101.
Posted by: Hitoribocchi at Thursday, July 08 2010 12:43 AM (T+5m5)
4
If you only watched one episode, how do you know?
I'll admit I took the high road on my review (which, I'll point out, ends with "I cannot, in good conscious, recommend the show."), but I still enjoyed Angel Beats. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe the potential that I see wasn't there... but if I saw it, it's pretty clear that there must have been SOMETHING potentially deeper, even if it's in my own head.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, July 08 2010 01:25 PM (PiXy!)
8
And HMM had a squidbot, which is even better than a turtle.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at Friday, July 09 2010 03:54 AM (fpXGN)
9
IMHO, HMM was pretty bad and I was unable to complete it. Dropped about 6 eps in. But since everyone praises it (not just in this circle -- J.P. said that he "agreed with every word SDB said about it"), I permit an idea that it has something to it. But hey, tastes differ. And as far as expert opinion goes Angel Beats does not even have that much. The best they say is "unfulfilled" (except Tappan, of course, who really lets his imagination feed on this corpse of a show). The comparison with HMM only says to me that Angel Beats must be dire.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Friday, July 09 2010 06:28 AM (/ppBw)
Posted by: J Greely at Friday, July 09 2010 04:36 PM (2XtN5)
12
Eh, I'm with Pete here. HMM wasn't exactly Perfect Anime, I didn't finish it either. I say Mahoromatic is a better robot-maid show, hated ending and all. And Angel Beats is... not terrible. It lacks focus, and the first episode had some bad CGI integration issues, but overall it's a lot prettier than the not-very-good anime I'm watching right now - Fate/Stay Night. *That* sucker has some serious issues with uneven character animation and off-design blob-faces. It's pretty clear which scenes the directors cared about, because you can *see* when they couldn't care less.
I haven't gotten around to watching the last episode of Angel Beats, mind you. Maybe it's a disaster of Evangelion 25/26 proportions.
Posted by: Mitch H. at Saturday, July 10 2010 12:42 AM (jwKxK)
13Eva only had four episodes. Did they do a remake? I always thought it ended abruptly. Probably that got cancelled too.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Saturday, July 10 2010 01:41 AM (PiXy!)
If the major movie, television and music studios would just ditch iTunes and sign up with Steam, we could turn the global economy around inside of six months.
Today only: Every Humphrey Bogart movie ever made, just $1.99 for the set! The complete anime and manga works of Osamu Tezuka, $3.74!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
03:51 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Saturday, July 03 2010 11:46 AM (+rSRq)
2
Very nicely done. I wasn't positive it was a spoof (as opposed to a scam) until the words 'telekinetic ability' came up. Good one. Thanks for the chuckle.
Posted by: Kathy Kinsley at Sunday, July 04 2010 03:51 AM (of4pL)
Here's the dirty little secret of conservative blogging, at least as
it appears to me: I'm sure the left is convinced we're all plugged in
to the GOP and getting our Two Minute Hate of the Day from GOP central,
and so on, and etc.
The actual truth is more scandalous. By and large (I can only speak
for myself) the GOP itself and GOP candidates don't even bother trying
to spin us or feed us something interesting to push.
I got banned from Little Green Footballs - which used to be a pretty good blog - for pointing this out. The Left of course think that this is how conservative blogs work, because that is how the Left works.
1
The GOP is stupid enough to think robo-calling me out of nowhere to play me a recording of Newt Gingrich blovating about something irrelevant is going to make me want to give them money and attention.
Sometimes I despair.
Posted by: Mitch H. at Thursday, July 01 2010 12:34 AM (jwKxK)
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Thursday, July 01 2010 03:31 AM (/ppBw)
4
It's a box on wheels. And the wheels part is debatable.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Thursday, July 01 2010 10:50 AM (PiXy!)
5
For the life of me, I don't understand what the hell happened to Charles Johnson. Maybe a lot of it is the same burnout that I went through, but I didn't end up completely flipping all my opinions on their head as a result of it. (I just stopped writing.)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Thursday, July 01 2010 03:30 PM (+rSRq)
6
From comments he made before I stopped bothering to visit LGF, I got the strong impression that he's nursing a grudge over being squeezed out of Pajamas Media, and accepted new sponsorship to pursue it.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at Friday, July 02 2010 01:35 AM (fpXGN)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Friday, July 02 2010 02:39 AM (+rSRq)
8
I may be forgetting the sequence of events, but I think a whole bunch of things went into the LGF demise. For me, it was centered on Charles being exposed as liar. Before it, if Charles said it, it was fact (like in case of Dan Rather). After, well... I started noticing it and stopped visiting long before the whole collapse, when attempts to smear Pamela exposed by R.S.McCain.
Now, Steven's question can be interpreted, as what has driven Charles to start lying and spinning? I did not track what was happening with that guy in dorky hat after the debacle of "Open Source News" (I still think Instapundit is crazy to string his horse to the cart with such track record). Maybe it was the reson, may it occured later, I cannot remember. But I think the feud with anti-jihadists occured earlier than Pajamas. That's where being the king and punishing dissenters took precendence reporting the truth. I suspect Pajamas fell out of it. But who knows.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Friday, July 02 2010 05:42 AM (/ppBw)
Don't know what happened at LGF. Could be partly burnout (I had it too, but like Steven, just stopped writing.) I still read over there once in a while. Just for old times sake.
I would, however, like to note that back when I was writing a lot, I got banned from only two blogs. Both of them were (what I would call) far-right. The lefty blogs where I commented just happily did their best to insult me, accuse me of being a racist, (odd since I never mentioned race) and the other usual no-logic responses to things they didn't agree with.
Posted by: Kathy Kinsley at Sunday, July 04 2010 03:57 AM (of4pL)
2. I was arlready in the process of immigrating to Australia. So really, 1 is just a bonus.
Posted by: Yahzi at Wednesday, June 30 2010 05:18 AM (iyNBK)
4
The best I can say for Julia Gillard is she's not literally Kevin Rudd.
Unfortunately, that's the best I can say for opposition leader Tony Abbott too. The upcoming election will definitely be a hold-your-nose affair. I'll take whoever will rid us of Steven Conroy, and Gillard has shown she's not up to the task.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Wednesday, June 30 2010 12:22 PM (PiXy!)
Update: Currently 2C and falling where I am, and -3C in western Sydney.
Update: Below 2C again at PixyLabs and a balmy -4C in the western suburbs. Brrr!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:25 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 85 words, total size 1 kb.
Sunday, June 27
Overhead, Without Any Fuss, The Stars Weren't Going Out
Doctor Who, Season 5, Episode 13, The Big Bang
To quote the Doctor himself (from The Doctor Dances):
Everybody lives, Rose! Just this once, everybody lives!
Or as Mrs. Doctor put it (from Silence in the Library):
Some days are special. Some days are so, so blessed. Some days, nobody dies at all. Now and then, every once in a very long while, every day in a million days, when the wind stands fair and the Doctor comes to call, everybody lives.
I may have had problems with one or two of the mid-season episodes, but the beginning and the ending were note-perfect.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:26 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
Feeling Groovy
Well, not exactly groovy, but at least dappled and drowsy and ready to sleep. And I haven't thrown up at all today.
Now I get to the fun part (based on the last time this happened to me): Not eating for another four or five days. Last time I got this far, started eating again, and it all came back twice as bad.
I have plenty of fruit juice and soft drinks (and some of that electrolyte-replacement powder stuff), so I'm not about to drop dead, but I expect to be pretty darn hungry by the middle of the week.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
05:40 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.
Sims 3
Yeah, I'm a little late to the table on this one.
I bought it the day it came out, and the expansion packs as they came out, and in between frantic dashes to the bathroom I've been playing it a bit over the last couple of days.
Verdict: Needs salt.
I haven't explored the expansion pack features yet, but compared to Sims 2 with its final count of 9 expansion packs and 9 "stuff" packs, there's a lot less goodies to play with in the core game.
On the other hand, the graphics are certainly better (unless you enable anti-aliasing on an ATI graphics card and then look at a tree) and you can move about town in real time - the entire town is one continuous area, and you don't go into timestop when visiting other parts of the town the way you did in Sims 2. (Apparently you do go into timestop when you go overseas in the World Adventures content, but I haven't tried that yet.)
It's still not SimsVille, which is what I always wanted; the town is too small, and you have little interaction with your sims when they're at work. The professions from the Ambitions pack corrects the latter, so I'm going to try that next as soon as I get Kei and Yuri promoted to astronaut. (They've already made International Super Spy.)
What I really want is a game that simulates an entire socio-politico-economic system at the level of the individual. Sim City is too top-down; The Sims is too small scale. Civilization, good as it is, is far too top-down and abstract to really explore the cost/benefit of policies - the cost/benefit is right there in the manual.
On the other hand, if I take my sims to China, I get to kick other sims in the face. If you've ever played any of the Sims games, I'm sure you've had that urge.
Oh, and EA? The prices on the Sims Store are insane. You need to cut them by about 80% if you want it to be a success.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
02:18 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Post contains 351 words, total size 2 kb.
Saturday, June 26
Steam Are At It Again
Tropico Reloaded (Tropico, the Paradise Island expansion, and Tropico 2 Pirate Cove) is going for $3.39.
